Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T03:28:57.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of an immunomodulatory feed additive on the development of mastitis in a mouse infection model using four bovine-origin isolates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2010

A. D. Rowson
Affiliation:
OmniGen Research, LLC. 1767 NW Kings Blvd. Corvallis, OR 97330, USA
Y.-Q. Wang
Affiliation:
OmniGen Research, LLC. 1767 NW Kings Blvd. Corvallis, OR 97330, USA
E. Aalseth
Affiliation:
Dairy Consulting 6514 113th Avenue NE, Lake Stevens, WA 98258, USA
N. E. Forsberg*
Affiliation:
OmniGen Research, LLC. 1767 NW Kings Blvd. Corvallis, OR 97330, USA
S. B. Puntenney
Affiliation:
OmniGen Research, LLC. 1767 NW Kings Blvd. Corvallis, OR 97330, USA

Abstract

The goal of this study was to examine the ability of a commercially available feed additive (OmniGen-AF) to reduce mammary infections caused by a single strain of mastitic pathogens (Streptococcus uberis, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae) and to examine the effects of the additive on markers of mammary immunity. Four experiments were completed using a murine model of bovine mastitis. Infection progression was examined using Sybr-green- and TaqMan-based quantitative PCR assays of 16S ribosomal DNA. Infection of the mammary gland with all pathogens caused rapid (24 to 48 h) appearance of pathogen DNA in mammary tissue. Provision of the feed additive for 2 weeks before infection significantly (P < 0.05) reduced the extent of pathogen DNA accumulation in models of S. uberis, E. coli and S. aureus infection. The additive was ineffective in reducing mammary infections caused by K. pneumoniae. We examined mechanisms of action of the additive through assessment of mammary concentrations of mammary myeloperoxidase (MPO), major histocompatibility complex 2 class II (MHC) and macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP) messenger RNA (mRNA) concentrations and by examining serum complement C3 concentration. Infection of the mammary gland increased concentrations of MPO and MHC mRNAs (P < 0.05). Ability of the pathogen to elicit changes in mammary MPO and MHC gene expression was enhanced by the provision of the additive for 2 weeks before infection. These data imply that the additive increased the mammary inflammatory response and increased antigen presentation during a mammary infection. Value of the additive in preventing mastitis in cattle awaits additional studies using a bovine model and further evaluation of additional strains of the pathogens used in this study.

Information

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2010
Figure 0

Table 1 Characterization of the bacterial strains1

Figure 1

Table 2 Primer sequences and reactions conditions for quantitative PCR and quantitative reverse Transcriptase PCR

Figure 2

Figure 1 Standard curves describing relationships between quantitative PCR and colony-forming units (CFU equivalents) for the four pathogens used in this study. Streptococcus uberis, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae are represented (a to d, respectively). R2 values and regression equations for each relationship are provided in the text.

Figure 3

Figure 2 Effects of the three experimental treatments on accumulation of Streptococcus uberis DNA in mammary tissue. Duration of infection was 48 h and eight mice were used for each treatment. Values (y axis) are expressed as colony-forming units (CFU)-equivalents/μl mammary gland homogenate ± s.e. Values are arithmetic means, whereas the statistical analysis was performed on log-transformed data. Treatments with differing superscripts (a, b) differ significantly (P < 0.05).

Figure 4

Figure 3 Effects of the three experimental treatments on accumulation of Escherichia coli in the mouse mammary gland. Duration of infection was 24 h and eight mice were used for each treatment. Values on the y axis are expressed as Escherichia coli colony-forming units (CFU) equivalents ± s.e. Differences were detected among the three treatments (P < 0.05). Values are arithmetic means, whereas the statistical analysis was performed on log-transformed data. Treatments with differing superscripts (a, b, c) differ significantly (P < 0.05).

Figure 5

Figure 4 Effects of the three experimental treatments on accumulation of Staphylococcus aureus DNA in mammary tissue. Duration of infection was 48 h and eight mice were used for each treatment. Values (y axis) are expressed as colony-forming units (CFU) equivalents/μl mammary gland homogenate ± s.e. Values are arithmetic means, whereas the statistical analysis was performed on log-transformed data. Differences were detected among the three treatments (P = 0.0017). Treatments with differing superscripts (a, b, c) differ significantly (P < 0.05).

Figure 6

Figure 5 Effects of three experimental treatments on accumulation of Klebsiella pneumoniae DNA in mammary tissue. Duration of infection was 24 h and eight mice were used for each treatment. Values are arithmetic means, whereas the statistical analysis was performed on log-transformed data. Values (y axis) are expressed as colony-forming units (CFU)-equivalents/μl mammary gland homogenate ± s.e.

Figure 7

Figure 6 Effects of the three experimental treatments on accumulation of Streptococcus uberis DNA in serum. Values (y axis) are expressed as colony-forming units (CFU) equivalents/μl serum ± s.e. Values are arithmetic means, whereas the statistical analysis was performed on log-transformed data. Differences were detected among the three treatments (P = 0.020). Treatments with differing superscripts (a, b, c) differ significantly (P < 0.05).

Figure 8

Figure 7 Hematoxylin and eosin staining to show the effects of Streptococcus uberis infusion on mammary histology. Animals which were fed a control diet and received an infusion of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (a), animals fed the control diet but infused with S. uberis (b) and animals fed with OmniGen-AF (0.5% w/w) and infused with S. uberis (c) are represented (magnification = ×20).

Figure 9

Table 3 Effects of three treatments on relative mammary MPO and MHC mRNAs and on serum C3 concentrations in animals challenged with Escherichia coli