Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T22:22:31.804Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ageing and the Body in Archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2017

Jo Appleby*
Affiliation:
School of Archaeology & Ancient History, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK Email: ja253@le.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The old are rarely the focus of research in archaeology. Older skeletonized bodies are hard to give a chronological age, and this seems to justify the lack of research focus. In this paper I argue that the old are not naturally invisible to archaeologists, but have been made so by a focus on chronology at the expense of the bodily and by our ambivalence towards the ageing process. I suggest that, rather than applying numbers to skeletons, we should focus our research on understanding the ageing of the body itself in archaeological contexts, and the relationships between processes of continuity and processes of decline. This is achieved through analysis of four aspects of embodied ageing: changes in appearance; in bodily function; in age-related disease; and in skill. The ageing body is not invisible: it is present, variable and a rich resource for future archaeological analyses.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2017 
Figure 0

Table 1. Common diseases of old age and their potential identification in archaeological contexts. N.B. Only risk factors likely to be different between ancient and modern populations are listed here. The influence of genetics and of changing population age structures are not included (i.e. risk is not considered ‘lower’ simply because of smaller numbers of older individuals in some past populations).