Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T09:46:46.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Resolving the taxonomic status of Frankliniella schultzei (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) colour forms in Kenya – a morphological-, biological-, molecular- and ecological-based approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2016

M. W. Gikonyo
Affiliation:
Plant Health Division, International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya Department of Biochemistry, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Juja, Kenya
S. Niassy
Affiliation:
Plant Health Division, International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya
G. B. Moritz
Affiliation:
Faculty of Natural Sciences I, Institute of Biology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
F. M. Khamis
Affiliation:
Plant Health Division, International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya
E. Magiri
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Juja, Kenya
S. Subramanian*
Affiliation:
Plant Health Division, International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya

Abstract

Frankliniella schultzei Trybom is a polyphagous pest and vector of tospoviruses worldwide. It occurs in dark and pale colour forms that are morphologically similar but differ in vector competency and geographic spread. In Kenya and other tropical regions, mixed populations of both colour forms are observed in similar habitats, so are considered as one species. To ascertain the taxonomic status of the two colour forms, they were characterized using morphological, molecular, biological and ecological approaches. Morphological characterization revealed differences between the colour forms on eight features and they separated into distinct clusters through principal component analysis. Restriction fragment length polymorphism of the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS-RFLP) analysis revealed differences between the two colour forms and was confirmed by differences in ITS2 sequences. Virgin pale females had female offspring (thelytoky), while virgin dark females had male offspring (arrhenotoky). Interbreeding of dark males with pale females resulted in pale females, indicating absence of interbreeding between the two colour forms. Laboratory colonies of pale forms lacked males and further analysis of F. schultzei males from Ipomoea setosa flowers in the field indicated the presence of dark males and the absence of pale males. Field surveys in Kenya indicated differences in distribution and host plant preferences among the colour forms. Lack of interbreeding, distinct host preferences and distribution, and morphological and molecular differences indicate that the two colour forms of F. schultzei could be different species. The results highlight the need for combining morphological, biological, molecular and ecological characteristics for resolving taxonomic status of closely related insects.

Figure 0

Fig. 1. Morphological features used in morphometric study. (A) Set1, Set2 and Sl, first, second and third ocellar setae length, respectively; (B) DfT, distance of third ocellar setae from tangent of anterior margin of hind ocellar; (C) TIX and TX, Tergite 9 and 10, respectively; S1 and S2, TX major setae length (S=seta); (D) Mls, metanotal lateral setae length; (E) Fw, forewing width; (F–G) Comb, absence of comb and presence of partial comb, respectively; TVIII, tergite 8.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. ITS2-RFLP banding profile of dark and pale forms of Frankliniella schultzei. (Lanes 1 and 13) 1Kb ladder; (lanes 2 and 8) ITS2 PCR Product of dark and pale forms, respectively; (lanes 3−6 and 9−12) restriction of ITS2 region of dark and pale forms, respectively using restriction enzymes Alu1, Hinf1, Rsa1 and HaeIII.

Figure 2

Table 1. Interbreeding of Frankliniella schultzei colour forms

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Mean length of seven quantitative morphological features of parental populations of the two colour forms of Frankliniella schultzei.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Mean length of third ocellar setae (Sl) and distance of the third ocellar setae from the tangent of the anterior margin of the hind ocellar (DfT) of parental populations of the two colour forms of Frankliniella schultzei compared to their F1 offspring.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Principal component analysis of morphometric character states of dark and pale forms of Frankliniella schultzei.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Multiple sequence alignment of a 498 bp section from the ITS2 region. Dark (KR105630 – KR105633) and pale (KR105634 – KR105637) Frankliniella schultzei sequences.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Unrooted neighbour-joining tree of Frankliniella schultzei constructed from Kimura two-parameter distance model. Dark (KR105630 – KR105633) and pale (KR105634 – KR105637).

Figure 8

Table 2. Genetic distances of Frankliniella schultzei ITS2 sequences. Dark (KR105630 – KR105633) and pale (KR105634 – KR105637)

Figure 9

Fig. 8. Principal component analysis of genetic distances between dark and pale forms of F. schultzei. Dark (KR105630 – KR105633) and pale (KR105634 – KR105637) Frankliniella schultzei.

Figure 10

Fig. 9. Principal component analysis of morphometric characters of males from Ipomoea setosa and dark Frankliniella schultzei males from the laboratory colony.

Figure 11

Fig. 10. ITS2-RFLP banding profile of males from Ipomoea setosa. (Lane 1) 100 bp ladder; (lanes 2–7) Restricted ITS2 region of males from Ipomoea setosa digested using restriction enzyme Alu1; (lane 8) dark F.schultzei male from colony; (lane 9) pale F. schultzei female from colony.

Figure 12

Fig. 11. Proportion of dark and pale Frankliniella schultzei in different provinces of Kenya.

Figure 13

Fig. 12. Proportion of dark and pale forms of Frankliniella schultzei collected from different host plants in Kenya.

Figure 14

Fig. 13. Numbers of dark and pale forms of Frankliniella schultzei collected from different altitudinal classes in Kenya.