Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T21:30:15.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Novel magnetic xanthan gum-kaolin-CoFe2O4 composite for efficient Fenton-like decolorization of malachite green

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2026

Serap Fındık*
Affiliation:
Chemical Engineering Department, Hitit University , Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 19030, Çorum, Türkiye
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The removal of persistent dye pollutants from wastewater remains a major environmental challenge, particularly due to the limited efficiency, stability, and reusability of clay-based catalytic systems. The present study aimed to develop an environmentally friendly and magnetically recoverable biopolymer–clay composite catalyst with enhanced performance for dye decolorization via a heterogeneous Fenton-like process. A novel catalyst composed of xanthan gum (XG), kaolin, and CoFe2O4 was synthesized and designated as XG-CF-K. The composite exhibited a Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area of 58.55 m2 g–1 and a saturation magnetization of 27.2 emu g–1. The catalyst was applied for the decolorization of malachite green (M-GR). The effects of various operational parameters, including XG-CF-K dosage, H2O2 concentration, pH, initial dye concentration, reaction time, and the presence of salt, were investigated systematically. Under optimal conditions (1 g L–1 XG-CF-K dosage, 20 mg L–1 M-GR concentration, pH 6, 0.147 M H2O2, 25°C, and 20 min reaction time), a decolorization efficiency of 95.9% was achieved. The decolorization kinetics followed a pseudo-first order model and were well described by the Langmuir–Hinshelwood mechanism. In addition, the catalyst exhibited good stability and reusability, and a plausible degradation mechanism was proposed. Overall, the results demonstrate that XG-CF-K is an effective, sustainable, and reusable catalyst for the removal of dye pollutants, offering a promising approach for wastewater-treatment applications.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Clay Minerals Society
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) XRD spectra and (b) FTIR spectra of XG-CF-K, kaolin, and XG.Figure 1. long description.

Figure 1

Figure 2. SEM images of (a) XG-CF-K, and (b) kaolin; EDS analysis of (c) XG-CF-K, and (d) kaolin.Figure 2. long description.

Figure 2

Figure 3. (a) TGA, (b) BET, and (c) VSM analysis of XG-CF-K.Figure 3. long description.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Effect of: (a) H2O2 concentration, (b) XG-CF-K amount, and (c) pH (CM-GR: 20 mg L–1, XG-CF-K amount: 1 g L–1 (for a,c), CH2O2: 0.147 M (for b, c), pH: 6 (for a, b), T: 25°C, t: 20 min), (d) zeta potential of XG-CF-K.Figure 4. long description.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Effect of (a) temperature and (b) salt (CM-GR: 20 mg L–1 (for b), amount of XG-CF-K: 1 g L–1, CH2O2: 0.147 M, pH: 6, T: 25°C (for b), t: 20 min) on the decolorization of M-GR.Figure 5. long description.

Figure 5

Figure 6. (a) Effect of the initial M-GR concentration on decolorization; (b) effect of the initial M-GR concentration on the initial degradation rate (XG-CF-K amount: 1 g L–1, CH2O2: 0.147 M, pH: 6, T: 25°C, t: 5 min (for b)); (c) plot of 1r0$ \frac{1}{r_0} $ versus 1C0$ \frac{1}{C_0} $ .Figure 6. long description.

Figure 6

Table 1. Kinetic constants for L-H kinetic modelTable 1. long description.

Figure 7

Figure 7. (a) Reusability of XG-CF-K for M-GR decolorization (CM-GR: 20 mg L–1, amount of XG-CF-K : 1 g L–1, CH2O2: 0.147 M, pH: 6, T: 25°C, t: 20 min); (b) FTIR spectra of fresh and reused XG-CF-K; (c) XRD patterns of XG-CF-K before use and after the third use (R-XG-CF-K).Figure 7. long description.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Comparison of different treatment processes (CM-GR: 20 mg L–1, composite amount: 1 g L–1, CH2O2: 0.147 M, pH: 6, T: 25°C, t: 20 min).Figure 8. long description.

Figure 9

Figure 9. (a) Decolorization of different cationic dyes (Cdye: 20 mg L–1, amount of XG-CF-K: 1 g L–1, CH2O2: 0.147 M, pH: 6, T: 25°C); (b) molecular structure of dyes used in the present study.Figure 9. long description.

Figure 10

Table 2. Comparison of COD removal and decolorization of different cationic dyes (Cdye: 20 mg L–1, XG-CF-K dosage: 1 g L–1, CH2O2: 0.147 M, pH: 6, T: 25°C)Table 2. long description.

Figure 11

Figure 10. (a) Changes in absorbance with wavelength over the reaction time; (b) effect of different scavengers on the decolorization of M-GR (CM-GR: 20 mg L–1, XG-CF-K amount: 1 g L–1, CH2O2: 0.147 M, pH: 6, T: 25°C, t: 20 min (for b)).Figure 10. long description.

Figure 12

Table 3. Comparison of decolorization efficiency of XG-CF-K with other compositesTable 3. long description.