Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-kv2lp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T12:02:27.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Flood Response in Rural Indonesia Implementing the World Health Organization Emergency Medical Team Minimum Data Set – Disaster Report

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2026

Aurick Yudha Nagara
Affiliation:
Doctoral Program in Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
Holipah Holipah
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
Sri Andarini
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
Hikmawan Wahyu Sulistomo*
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
*
Corresponding author: Hikmawan Wahyu Sulistomo, MD, PhD Department of Pharmacology Jalan Veteran Malang, 65145, Indonesia E-mail: hikmawan_ws@ub.ac.id
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Indonesia experiences recurrent natural disasters that impose substantial strain on its health system, with annual flooding affecting rural communities such as Sitiarjo Sumbermanjing Wetan. Despite these recurring events, Indonesia has not systematically adopted the World Health Organization (WHO) Emergency Medical Team (EMT) Minimum Data Set (MDS) for standardized disaster medical reporting, thereby limiting data integration and evidence-based policy development. This disaster report describes the operational patterns, clinical demographics, and syndromic distribution captured by the WHO EMT MDS framework across three distinct flood responses in 2017, 2022, and 2023. The Universitas Brawijaya Emergency Medical Team (UB-EMT) prospectively collected daily surveillance data using the WHO EMT MDS reporting system. A total of 363 consultations were analyzed and stratified according to age, sex, and reporting period. Consultation volume peaked on Day 1 and declined on subsequent days. Females accounted for 62% of the cases and adults (18-64 years old) represented the majority of patients (68.87%). The most frequently reported conditions were skin diseases (33.46%), musculoskeletal problems (24.39%), and acute respiratory infections (16.64%), respectively. Age-specific patterns were evident: preschoolers and school-aged children presented with acute respiratory infections, whereas adults and older people more commonly experienced skin diseases and musculoskeletal problems. The absence of systematic implementation of the WHO EMT MDS constrains standardized surveillance and inter-team coordination in disaster settings. Therefore, the institutional adoption of the WHO EMT MDS is essential to strengthen real-time monitoring, optimize resource allocation, and enhance post-disaster evaluation in Indonesia.

Information

Type
Disaster Report
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine
Figure 0

Table 1. Methodological Mapping Matrix: Conversion of 2017 J-SPEED Variables to WHO EMT MDS StandardTable 1 long description.

Figure 1

Table 2. Temporal Breakdown of UB-EMT Consultations by Deployment Period and Operational Days (N = 363)Table 2 long description.

Figure 2

Figure 1. Demographics of Consultations Provided by UB-EMT in Flood-Affected Areas in Sitiarjo Village, Sumbermanjing Wetan, Indonesia, 2017-2023. (1A): Operational Workload Trends Highlighting the Front-Loaded Day 1 Surge; (1B): Gender Distribution Across Deployment Years; and (1C): Age Group Mapped to MDS WHO Categories.

Figure 3

Figure 2. Figure 2 long description.Clinical Syndromic Matrix and Operational Utility Analysis Tracking: (2A) Evolution of Top Five Clinical Conditions across UB-EMT Responses (restricted to 2017 and 2022 cohorts); (2B) Age-Specific Distribution Profile of Aggregate Health Events; and (2C) Comparative Proportion of Context based on WHO MDS Disaster-Relation Classifications (MDS 44–46).

Figure 4

Table 3. Comparative Matrix of Disease Rankings Between Disaster-Free Baseline and Active Flood ResponsesTable 3 long description.