Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T03:18:51.278Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Synthesis and design of PSf/TiO2 composite membranes for reduction of chromium (VI): Stability and reuse of the product and the process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2014

M.S. Jyothi
Affiliation:
Catalysis Division, Center for Nano and Material Sciences, Jain University, Ramanagaram, Bangalore 562112, India
Mahesh Padaki*
Affiliation:
Catalysis Division, Center for Nano and Material Sciences, Jain University, Ramanagaram, Bangalore 562112, India
R. Geetha Balakrishna*
Affiliation:
Catalysis Division, Center for Nano and Material Sciences, Jain University, Ramanagaram, Bangalore 562112, India
Ranjith Krishna Pai
Affiliation:
Catalysis Division, Center for Nano and Material Sciences, Jain University, Ramanagaram, Bangalore 562112, India
*
a) Address all correspondence to these authors. e-mail: sp.mahesh@jainuniversity.ac.in

Abstract

The study demonstrates the 100% repeated recyclability of hybrid membranes without any pretreatment. Composite membranes designed with titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles (NPs) and polysulfone (PSf) membranes were used for reduction of chromium (Cr) (VI) to Cr (III) under sunlight. Different concentrations of TiO2 NPs varying from 1.5% to 2.5% with the difference of 0.5% were incorporated into the membrane matrix. Increase in weight percentage of TiO2 particles enhances the reduction to 100% within 2.5 h with an increase in recyclable capacity as well. The effect of recycling on the surface of the membrane was studied using x-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM), and atomic force microscopy (AFM). The observations in general indicate an increase in roughness without affecting the catalytic efficiency up to six recycles. The study on surface membrane morphology and catalytic efficiency with reusability opens a scope for a feasible economical chromium reduction via a membrane process. Macro and micro structure of the membrane before reduction and after recycling were studied and compared with scientific evidence. Based on the results, the kinetic model was proposed for the reduction reactions.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 
Figure 0

TABLE I. Nomenclature of the membranes, with their composition in weight percentage.

Figure 1

FIG. 1. Extent of Cr (VI) reduction in sunlight under different experimental conditions.

Figure 2

SCHEME 1. Representation of (a) electron hole formation, (b) hole scavenging, and (c) reduction process.

Figure 3

SCHEME 2. Variation of surface charge properties of TiO2 with pH.

Figure 4

FIG. 2. XRD patterns of (a) bare TiO2 NPs and neat PSf, (b) M1 membrane before reduction process (BM1) and after recycling (AM1), (c) M2 membrane before reduction process (BM2) and after recycling (AM2), (d) M3 membrane before reduction process (BM3) and after recycling (AM3).

Figure 5

TABLE II. Crystallite size and roughness of the membranes before and after recycling for six times to carry out reduction of Cr (VI).

Figure 6

FIG. 3. SEM images for (a) TiO2 NPs, (b) neat PSf membrane, (c) BM1, (d) BM2, (e) BM3, (f) AM1, (g) AM2, and (h) AM3 six recycles of photocatalytic reaction.

Figure 7

FIG. 4. 3D images of AFM for PSf TiO2 composites before the reduction and after the recycling process.

Figure 8

FIG. 5. The UV visible absorption spectra for reduction of Cr (VI) after two hours of treatment, under various experimental conditions.

Figure 9

FIG. 6. A plot of −2.303 log C/C0 versus time of illumination for the photoreduction process by using hybrid membrane (M3) in the presence of acid.

Figure 10

FIG. 7. A plot of 1/v versus 1/C for the photocatalytic reduction of Cr (VI) using composite membranes with different dosages of TiO2 NPs, in the presence of acid and sunlight.