Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T12:10:15.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SEQUENTIAL THERMAL ANALYSIS OF COMPLEX ORGANIC MIXTURES: PROCEDURAL STANDARDS AND IMPROVED CO2 PURIFICATION CAPACITY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2023

Ulrich M Hanke*
Affiliation:
NOSAMS Laboratory, Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 266 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA, 02543 USA Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 266 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA, 02543 USA
Alan R Gagnon
Affiliation:
NOSAMS Laboratory, Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 266 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA, 02543 USA
Christopher M Reddy
Affiliation:
Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 266 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA, 02543 USA
Mary C Lardie Gaylord
Affiliation:
NOSAMS Laboratory, Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 266 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA, 02543 USA
Anne J Cruz
Affiliation:
NOSAMS Laboratory, Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 266 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA, 02543 USA
Valier Galy
Affiliation:
Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 266 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA, 02543 USA
Roberta L Hansman
Affiliation:
NOSAMS Laboratory, Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 266 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA, 02543 USA
Mark D Kurz
Affiliation:
NOSAMS Laboratory, Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 266 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA, 02543 USA Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 266 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA, 02543 USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: uhanke@whoi.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sequential thermal analysis allows for deconvoluting the refractory nature and complexity of carbon mixtures embedded in mineral matrices for subsequent offline stable carbon and radiocarbon (14C) isotope analyses. Originally developed to separate Holocene from more ancient sedimentary organic matter to improve dating of marine sediments, the Ramped Pyrolysis and Oxidation (RPO) apparatus, or informally, the “dirt burner” is now used to address pressing questions in the broad field of biogeochemistry. The growing interest in the community now necessitates improved handling and procedures for routine analyses of difficult sample types. Here we report on advances in CO2 purification during sample processing, modifications to the instrumentation at the National Ocean Sciences Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (NOSAMS) facility, and introduce sodium bicarbonate procedural standards with differing natural abundance 14C signatures for blank assessment. Measurements from different environmental samples are used to compare the procedure to the different generations of sequential thermal analyses. With this study, we aim to improve the standardization of the procedures and prepare this instrumentation for innovations in online stable carbon isotopes and direct AMS-interface measurements in the future.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press for the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona
Figure 0

Figure 1 (A) Overview sketch of the NOSAMS RPO (aka “dirt burner”) which includes the combustion columns (B) within the oven (reactor); (B) Overview of different combustion columns used in this study, including pyrolysis-RPO, oxidation-RPO and the full oxidation (FOX) mode described here (right inset). Note that the sidearm was used in (a) to supply the O2 aside of the sample insert to oxidize thermally mobilized matter in the lower combustion section (800°C). In (b) it is available for switching between modes yet commonly is just flushed with premixed He + O2 and thus was waived for (c) the full oxidation mode. During operation the entire combustion column is enclosed by the resistance furnace and operated between ambient temperature (25°C) and 1000°C.

Figure 1

Table 1 Sample details on types, pretreatment, and bulk carbon isotopic contents measured in this study or previously reported in the literature.

Figure 2

Figure 2 Comparison of CO2 evolution profiles (thermograms) for NIST SRM1649a analyzed with the conventional RPO setup and the novel FOX combustion setup (in duplicate) at almost identical sample weight. Results support the similarity between RPO and FOX combustion reactors over the entire temperature range and highlight the slightly refined profile for FOX.

Figure 3

Figure 3 Sample thermograms showing CO2 profiles (lines; ppm; left y-axis) for each sample with fraction yields (bar plots; µg C; right y-axis) over the identical temperature range. Sodium bicarbonate plot contains results for both materials, type 1 14Cdepleted (light green line and light gray bars) and type 2 14Cmodern (dark green line and dark gray bars).

Figure 4

Figure 4 Details on individual 14C results (Fm) from sodium bicarbonate splits (100–190°C and 650–850°C) with AMS uncertainty, mass-balance reconstructed bulk Fmmeasured (only for sequence blank analysis illustrated in black squares) and bulk Fmcorrected after mass balance corrections with bulk Fm of accepted values (dashed lines). Independent blank analysis replicate 2 (open circles) and replicate 3 (open triangles) support the reproducibility of blank determinations using FOX combustion column with this set of sodium bicarbonates.

Figure 5

Figure 5 Results from carbon isotope analyes for samples showing Fmcorrected (black squares; left y-axis) and δ 13C (gray circles; right y-axis). Note that dots mark mid-temperature of each split with horizontal lines indicating temperature range of each split. Vertical error bars show analytical uncertainties, but are generally smaller than the symbols, except for the Wild Harbor sample because of the similar isotopic signatures. Note that reported uncertainties are unusually small for these measurements—we determined a low-level blank mass and measured large sample masses.

Figure 6

Table 2 Sample splits and temperature range with mass, Fmmeasured and Fmcorrected to illustrate the impact of mass balance blank correction for each sample as well as to show uncertainties from the AMS vs blank correction.

Supplementary material: File

Hanke et al. supplementary material

Hanke et al. supplementary material

Download Hanke et al. supplementary material(File)
File 352.2 KB