Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-kv2lp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T11:25:10.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A multiband truncated patch antenna based on EBG structure for IoMT and 5G networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2023

Saurabh Raj*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology, Allahabad, Prayagraj, India
Piyush Kumar Mishra
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology, Allahabad, Prayagraj, India
Vijay Shanker Tripathi
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology, Allahabad, Prayagraj, India
*
Corresponding author: Saurabh Raj, Email: saurabhraj@mnnit.ac.in
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, a truncated patch antenna based on the electromagnetic band gap (EBG) structure has been proposed. The fabricated antenna has five operating frequencies at 10.4, 15.68, 19.68, 27.2, and 35.04 GHz. The fabricated prototype of the antenna constitutes a truncated rectangular patch etched with the shape of a symmetrical slot (on top) and an EBG loaded on the ground plane of the dielectric substrate. The optimized volume of the antenna is 20 × 15 × 1.57 mm3. The proposed antenna gives a good radiation pattern for the E-H field in all covered bandwidth and also achieved better performances related to the reference papers. A multiband antenna also covered the 5 G bandwidth, which resonates at 27.2 GHz from 24.2 GHz to 27.84 GHz bandwidth and at 35.04 GHz from 33.84 GHz to 36.2 GHz bandwidth, which can be used in the Internet of Medical Things. On the other hand, X/Ku/K frequency bands have been committed for wireless communication where the multiband antenna can be used to help in monitoring, especially in the case of data transmission from radio frequency sensors to health-care system in real-time applications.

Information

Type
Metamaterials and Photonic Bandgap Structures
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association
Figure 0

Figure 1. Schematic view of smart health-care system based on a 5 G network [2].

Figure 1

Figure 2. EBG structure of ground plane unit cell.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Current distribution on EBG unit cell.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Band gap of EBG surface with the reflection phase diagram.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Band gap of EBG surface with transmission loss graph.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Real and Imaginary permeability of design unit cell.

Figure 6

Figure 7. Real and Imaginary permittivity of design unit cell.

Figure 7

Figure 8. Real and Imaginary refractive index of design unit cell.

Figure 8

Figure 9. Real and imaginary impedance of design unit cell.

Figure 9

Figure 10. The simulated geometry of the proposed EBG-based truncated patch antenna: (a) top view and (b) bottom view.

Figure 10

Figure 11. The fabricated design of the proposed EBG-based truncated patch antenna: (a) top view and (b) bottom view.

Figure 11

Figure 12. Planner periodic EBG structure.

Figure 12

Figure 13. Simulated reflection coefficient S11 (dB) versus frequency with and without EBG.

Figure 13

Figure 14. Simulated and measured graph of S11 (dB) with EBG.

Figure 14

Figure 15. S11 graph with and without truncation on the corner of a rectangular patch.

Figure 15

Figure 16. Surface current density (a) with EBG and (b) with PEC.

Figure 16

Figure 17. Radiation efficiency graph with and without loading of EBG ground plane.

Figure 17

Figure 18. Surface current distribution (a) on radiating patch and (b) on EBG ground plane.

Figure 18

Figure 19. Simulated result of axial ratio at 27.2 GHz.

Figure 19

Figure 20. Simulated and measured gain of proposed antenna at multiple resonant frequencies.

Figure 20

Figure 21. (a) Gain of antenna with and without EBG and (b) axial ratio of antenna with and without EBG.

Figure 21

Figure 22. Simulated and measured radiation pattern at (a) 10.4 GHz, (b) 15.68 GHz, (c) 19.68 GHz, (d) 27.2 GHz, and (e) 35.04 GHz.

Figure 22

Figure 23. Simulated and measured co-cross-polarization in E- and H-planes (dB) at (a) and (b) 10.4 GHz, (c) and (d) 15.68 GHz, (e) and (f) 19.68 GHz, (g) and (h) 27.2 GHz, and (i) and (j) 35.04 GHz.

Figure 23

Figure 24. Measurement setup for glucose level monitoring by loading of thumb on radiating patch.

Figure 24

Table 1. Comparison of the parameter of proposed design with other referenced paper