Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T10:16:35.757Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

U–Pb ages of Miocene near-trench granitic rocks of the Southwest Japan arc: implications for magmatism related to hot subduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2019

Hironao Shinjoe*
Affiliation:
Tokyo Keizai University, 1-7-34 Minami-cho Kokubunji, Tokyo 185-0021, Japan
Yuji Orihashi
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Hirosaki University, 3 Bunkyo-cho, Hirosaki, Amori 036-8561, Japan
Ryo Anma
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Technology, Industrial and Social Sciences, Tokushima University, 2-1 Minami-josanjima, Tokushima 770-8506, Japan
*
Author for correspondence: Hironao Shinjoe, Email: shinjoe@tku.ac.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present a new dataset of zircon U–Pb ages that document igneous activity in the SW Japan arc during middle Miocene time and discuss its relationship with the opening of the Japan Sea, Philippine Sea plate migration, and subduction of the young hot lithosphere of the Shikoku Basin. Precursory magmatism, characterized by dike and stock intrusions, started c. 15.6 Ma in both Kyushu and the Kii Peninsula. Most plutonism occurred between 15.5 and 13.5 Ma in an area 600 km long and 150 km wide. No along-arc trend was recognized in the U–Pb ages of igneous activity near the trench. Our data indicate that all near-trench middle Miocene igneous activity occurred immediately after the opening of the Japan Sea ceased, i.e. after 16 Ma, implying that melt extraction and the emplacement of granites in the near-trench region had some influence on the back-arc opening. Our data also imply that the trench–trench–trench-type triple junction between the Japan arc and the Izu–Bonin–Mariana arc must have reached the east side of the Kii Peninsula by 15.6 Ma. The wide distribution of contemporaneous magmatic activity along the arc requires a trench-parallel heat source, such as the subduction of a trench-parallel ridge or a young and highly segmented ridge–fracture zone system in addition to the hot wedge mantle condition related to the opening of Japan Sea.

Figure 0

Fig. 1. Index map showing the tectonic setting of the Japanese Islands and the location of the SW Japan arc (rectangle). Also indicated are Miocene tectonic events including the rapid clockwise rotation of the SW Japan arc related to the opening of the Japan Sea and the clockwise rotation of the Philippine Sea plate. An extinct spreading ridge on the Philippine Sea plate that formed the Shikoku Basin is indicated with dashed lines. Open triangles are Quaternary volcanoes. Localities in the study area: A, Kii Peninsula; B, western Shikoku; C, Kyushu; MTL, Median Tectonic Line.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Outline map of SW Japan showing the distribution of middle Miocene igneous rocks in the near-trench region of the SW Japan arc (compiled from Geological Survey of Japan, 2015). Abbreviations of tectonic features: MTL, Median Tectonic Line; BTL, Butsuzo Tectonic Line; UYTL, Usuki–Yatsushiro Tectonic Line. Abbreviations of igneous bodies: OGRs, Ohmine Granitic Rocks; KARs, Kumano Acidic Rocks; MM, Murotomisaki body; SG, Shingu alkali basalt dike; AS, Ashizuri igneous complex; TG, Tanegashima alkali dolerite dike. Numbers next to igneous bodies correspond to their entries in Table 1. Black triangles represent Quaternary volcanoes. Light grey shading indicates the Setouchi Volcanic Belt.

Figure 2

Table 1. Summary of geological background of the near-trench igneous bodies in SW Japan analysed in this study

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Major-element variation diagrams for the felsic rocks of the Outer Zone. Samples from the Shionomisaki igneous complex include two mafic rocks and a rhyolite. Most of the data points are for the samples used for the zircon U–Pb analysis, but some are for different samples of similar lithology. Data are from Ogasawara (1997), Anma et al. (1998), Shinjoe et al. (2007) and Shinjoe (unpublished data). A/CNK, Alumina saturation index.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Y–Nb and (Y + Nb) – Rb discrimination diagrams (Pearce et al. 1984) showing the classification of felsic rocks of the Outer Zone of the SW Japan arc.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Whole-rock trace-element compositions of selected felsic rocks in the Kii Peninsula (data from Shinjoe et al. 2007), normalized to normal MORB (Sun & McDonough, 1989).

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Sr and Nd isotopic compositions of felsic plutonic rocks in the Outer Zone of the SW Japan arc (data from Terakado et al. 1988; Shinjoe, 1997).

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Probability density plots and histograms of previously reported radiometric ages of the OZGs in the SW Japan arc: (a) Kii Peninsula (from Iwano et al. 2007), (b) Western Shikoku (from Shinjoe & Sumii, 2001) and (c) Kyushu (from Shinjoe & Sumii, 2003; Oikawa et al. 2006). Ages were determined by K–Ar or zircon fission-track methods, plus a few obtained by the Rb–Sr whole-rock isochron method.

Figure 8

Table 2. Summary of LA–ICP–MS operating conditions

Figure 9

Fig. 8. Cathodoluminescence images showing representative zonal structures of analysed zircon grains. (a) I-type granodiorite in western Shikoku (EHI38), (b) welded tuff of the S-type Kumano Acidic Rocks in Kii Peninsula. We conducted LA-ICP-MS analysis mainly on the rim of the zircon crystals to constrain the magmatic age of the samples. Generally, most of the rim of the euhedral zircons of I-type granitic rocks yielded concordant primary magmatic ages, though some grains have dark core in CL images (a). Discordant analytical points (marked ‘d’) were presumed to be affected by common Pb (see Fig. 9). S-type granitic rocks usually contain a considerable amount of inherited zircons. For example, some of the rims for euhedral grains in S-type rhyolitic welded tuff (b) show Mesozoic ages. (c) Euhedral grains with concentric oscillatory zoning (from sample EHI100). These usually yielded concordant magmatic ages (right-hand grain), although some showed discordant results affected by common lead (analytical points marked ‘d’) or concordant older ages (left-hand grain). (d) Euhedral grains with oscillatory zoning rims and homogeneous cores (from sample IuchiWT) yielded concordant magmatic ages. (e) Euhedral grains with thin (<20 μm) rims with oscillatory zoning and intricately zoned cores showing concordant Cretaceous ages (from sample IuchiWT). (f) Euhedral grains showing concentric oscillatory zoning (from sample TKG1) with concordant Permian ages. (g) Anhedral grains with rims with oscillatory zoning yielded concordant magmatic ages (from sample TKG1).

Figure 10

Table 3. Results of zircon U–Pb ages

Figure 11

Fig. 9. (a–e) Tera–Wasserburg concordia diagrams and plots of the result of weighted mean calculation of 238U–206Pb ages of concordant primary zircons of five representative samples: (a) Dolerite (SP202) of the Shionomisaki igneous complex in Kii Peninsula; (b) S-type rhyolitic welded tuff (IuchiWT) of the Kumano Acidic Rocks in Kii Peninsula; (c) I-type granodiorite (DO3C) of the Dorogawa pluton in Kii Peninsula; (d) S-type granodiorite (UWA6) of the Uwajima pluton in western Shikoku; (e) I-type granodiorite (EHI38) of Omogo pluton in the Ishizuchi Group, western Shikoku. Tera–Wasserburg diagrams in the second row show the enlarged view including the primary magmatic zircon population together with the regression line to estimate the contamination of common Pb. I-type granitic rocks and dolerite (a, c, e) comprise no or a few inherited zircon grains, and the main cause of discordance is presumed to be common Pb contamination. On the other hand, S-type granitic rocks (b, d) contain a considerable amount of inherited zircon grains in addition to grains affected by common Pb contamination. Grey symbols in the plots of the result of weighted mean calculation show the analysis statistically rejected from the calculation. (f) Concordia diagrams of the zircons from an I-type granodirite (IC01) from Ichifusayama in Kyushu. No primary magmatic zircon was found. The concordia diagram in the second row is the enlarged view of the area younger than 200 Ma. Concordia diagrams and plots of the result of the weighted mean of 238U–206Pb ages of concordant primary zircons for all of the analysed samples are presented in the Supplementary Material (S12) (https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756819000785).

Figure 12

Fig. 10. Probability density plots and histograms of 238U–206Pb ages of the middle Miocene felsic rocks of the SW Japan arc from (a) the Kii Peninsula, (b) western Shikoku and (c) Kyushu.

Figure 13

Fig. 11. Outline map of the Kii Peninsula showing the distribution of near-trench igneous rocks and their zircon U–Pb ages. Sample identifications are the same as those listed in Table 3. MTL, Median Tectonic Line.

Figure 14

Fig. 12. Outline map of western Shikoku showing the distribution of near-trench igneous rocks and their zircon U–Pb ages. Sample identifications are the same as those listed in Table 3. MTL, Median Tectonic Line. U–Pb zircon ages for the Ashizuri igneous complex are shown for comparison (Shinjoe et al. 2010).

Figure 15

Fig. 13. Outline map of Kyushu showing the distribution of near-trench igneous rocks and their zircon U–Pb ages. UYTL, Usuki–Yatsushiro Tectonic Line. U–Pb zircon ages for the Ohno Volcanic Rocks, a member of the Setouchi Volcanic Rocks, are listed at the top for comparison (Shinjoe & Orihashi, 2017).

Figure 16

Fig. 14. Lithological map of the Shionomisaki Igneous Complex at the southernmost tip of the Kii Peninsula showing sample localities and U–Pb ages. Zircon fission-track ages (Hoshi et al. 2003) and sample locations are shown for comparison.

Figure 17

Fig. 15. Lithological map of the Kumano Acidic Rocks in the SE Kii Peninsula showing sample localities and U–Pb ages. Previous dating results are shown for comparison: K–Ar ages are marked ‘1’ (Sumii et al. 1998) and zircon fission-track ages are marked ‘2’ (Iwano et al. 2007).

Figure 18

Fig. 16. Lithological map of the Yakushima pluton in Yakushima Island, south of Kyushu, showing sample localities and U–Pb ages. K–Ar ages from MITI (1992) are shown for comparison.

Figure 19

Fig. 17. Miocene plate configuration models around SW Japan. IBA, palaeo-IBM arc; KPR, Kyushu–Palau Ridge. (a) Late TTT triple junction migration model (e.g. Sdrolias et al. 2004; Kimura et al. 2014). The palaeo-IBM arc migrates along the margin from Kyushu to the Izu Peninsula from 15 to 5 Ma during near-trench magmatism in the SW Japan arc. (b) Plate configuration showing subduction of the Pacific plate before the rapid rotation of SW Japan (e.g. Hibbard & Karig, 1990). (c) Plate configuration based on the Heike plate hypothesis (Yamaji & Yoshida, 1998) before the rapid rotation of SW Japan.

Figure 20

Fig. 18. Plate configuration model of the SW Japan arc in middle Miocene time. (a) At ∼20 Ma, before the opening of the Japan Sea and rotation of the SW Japan arc, the Pacific plate subducted beneath the entire length of the Japanese islands and formed a volcanic arc well inboard of the trench (arc position from Kano et al. 1991, and Hoshi et al. 2015b). No magmatism took place near the trench in the SW Japan arc. (b) At ∼15 Ma, clockwise rotation of the SW Japan arc led to consumption of the wedge-shaped section of the Pacific plate and hot lithosphere of the Shikoku Basin in the Philippine Sea plate subducted beneath the SW Japan arc to cause near-trench magmatism (black stars) from Kyushu to the Kii Peninsula starting ∼15.6 Ma. The simultaneous onset of near-trench magmatism over this part of the trench requires that the palaeo-IBM arc was located east of the Kii Peninsula, where its collision with Honshu formed the Kanto syntaxis before 15 Ma (Hoshi, 2018b).

Supplementary material: File

Shinjoe et al. supplementary material

Shinjoe et al. supplementary material 1

Download Shinjoe et al. supplementary material(File)
File 90.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Shinjoe et al. supplementary material

Shinjoe et al. supplementary material 2

Download Shinjoe et al. supplementary material(File)
File 44.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Shinjoe et al. supplementary material

Shinjoe et al. supplementary material 3

Download Shinjoe et al. supplementary material(File)
File 20.3 MB
Supplementary material: File

Shinjoe et al. supplementary material

Shinjoe et al. supplementary material 4

Download Shinjoe et al. supplementary material(File)
File 68.6 MB