Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-6grmk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T04:02:00.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Low-profile U-shaped DRA for ultra-wideband applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2016

Idris Messaoudene*
Affiliation:
INRS-EMT, University of Quebec, Montreal, QC H5A 1K6, Canada Laboratoire Hyperfréquences et Semiconducteurs, Université des Frères Mentouri Constantine, Algérie
Tayeb A. Denidni
Affiliation:
INRS-EMT, University of Quebec, Montreal, QC H5A 1K6, Canada
Abdelmadjid Benghalia
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Hyperfréquences et Semiconducteurs, Université des Frères Mentouri Constantine, Algérie
*
Corresponding author: I. Messaoudene Email: messaoudene@emt.inrs.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, a microstrip-fed U-shaped dielectric resonator antenna (DRA) is simulated, designed, and fabricated. This antenna, in its simple configuration, operates from 5.45 to 10.8 GHz. To enhance its impedance bandwidth, the ground plane is first modified, which leads to an extended bandwidth from 4 to 10.8 GHz. Then by inserting a rectangular metallic patch inside the U-shaped DRA, the bandwidth is increased more to achieve an operating band from 2.65 to 10.9 GHz. To validate these results, an experimental antenna prototype is fabricated and measured. The obtained measurement results show that the proposed antenna can provide an ultra-wide bandwidth and a symmetric bidirectional radiation patterns. With these features, the proposed antenna is suitable for ultra-wideband applications.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2016 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Evolution of the proposed antenna: (a) antenna I, (b) antenna II, and (c) proposed antenna.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Reflection coefficients for various antenna designs.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Geometry of the proposed antenna: (a) top view, (b) bottom view, and (c) side view.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Simulated reflection coefficient for different DR height ‘D’ with h = 0.762 mm, lg1 = 10.6 mm, lg2 = 8 mm, and Wg = 28.25 mm.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Simulated reflection coefficient for different substrate thickness ‘h’ with D = 5 mm, lg1 = 10.6 mm, lg2 = 8 mm, and Wg = 28.25 mm.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Simulated reflection coefficient for different ground plane width ‘Wg’ with h = 0.762 mm, D = 5 mm, lg1 = 10.6 mm, and lg2 = 8 mm.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Simulated reflection coefficient for different DR height ‘lg1’ with h = 0.762 mm, D = 5 mm, lg2 = 8 mm, and Wg = 28.25 mm.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Simulated reflection coefficient for different DR height ‘lg2’ with h = 0.762 mm, D = 5 mm, lg1 = 10.6 mm, and Wg = 28.25 mm.

Figure 8

Table 1. The antenna bandwidth for different parameter values.

Figure 9

Fig. 9. The photograph of the final UWB antenna prototype: (a) top view and (b) bottom view.

Figure 10

Fig. 10. Measured and simulated impedance matching bandwidth of the proposed antenna.

Figure 11

Fig. 11. The phase of S11 of the proposed antenna.

Figure 12

Fig. 12. Measured and simulated radiation patterns for the UWB antenna at: (a) 3.5 GHz, (b) 6.5 GHz, and (c) 9.5 GHz.

Figure 13

Fig. 13. Simulated and measured antenna gain.

Figure 14

Table 2. Radiation efficiency of the antenna at selected frequencies.

Figure 15

Table 3. FF of the proposed antenna.