Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T23:40:57.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Feeding habits and trophic status of Merluccius hubbsi along the northernmost limit of its distribution in the South-western Atlantic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2019

Paulo A. S. Costa*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecologia e Recursos Marinhos, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Programa de Pós-graduação em Dinâmica dos Oceanos e da Terra, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brazil
Adriana C. Braga
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecologia e Recursos Marinhos, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Giovanna S. Malavolti
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecologia e Recursos Marinhos, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Marcos A. L. Franco
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biociências e Biotecnologia, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro (UENF), Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, Brazil
Pedro V. Gatts
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-graduação em Dinâmica dos Oceanos e da Terra, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brazil Departamento de Biociências e Biotecnologia, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro (UENF), Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, Brazil
Andressa Batista
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biociências e Biotecnologia, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro (UENF), Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, Brazil
Carlos E. Rezende
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biociências e Biotecnologia, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro (UENF), Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Paulo A. S. Costa, E-mail: paulocosta.unirio@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Stomach contents analysis and stable isotope results indicate M. hubbsi is a generalist predator that feeds mainly on demersal fishes, followed by crustaceans and cephalopods. Ontogenetic changes in diet were identified, with fish importance increasing in the diet with hake size. Smaller hake (<250 mm) fed mostly on the sepiolid Semirossia tenera (89.45%IRI) and engraulid fish (89.96%IRI). Mid-sized hake (250–300 mm) fed mainly on benthic fish such as Bellator brachychir (95.63%IRI) and euphausiids (56.46%IRI), while larger hake (>300 mm) fed heavily on Dactylopterus volitans (94.80%IRI) and occasionally on a variety of teleosts. Significant correlations between δ13C (P < 0.05), THg (P < 0.001) and hake size occurred, whereas no relationship was observed between δ15N and hake size or δ15N and total mercury. Signatures were lowest in smaller hake with a tendency of increasing with size. Smaller and larger hake were significantly different in δ13C. Differences regarding isotopic niche width were quantified for each size group; trophic diversity and trophic redundancy among them were negligible, but hake >300 mm possibly have a larger feeding plasticity due to the combination of prey from a wide trophic level range.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2019 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of Rio de Janeiro coast, showing the location of Merluccius hubbsi fishing grounds during 2013–2014. The points refer to the geographic coordinates of satellite signals during fishing operations.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Length-frequency distribution of Merluccius hubbsi landed in Niterói-Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, between May 2013 and April 2014 and used in stomach contents analysis.

Figure 2

Table 1. Relative importance of the most frequent and abundant prey of Merluccius hubbsi landed in Niterói-Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, between May 2013 and April 2014

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Dendrogram based on %IRI values of M. hubbsi size classes (Lt, mm) using group-average clustering from Bray–Curtis similarity on diet data. R = Sample statistic associated to ANOSIM analysis.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Size-preference of identified prey according to their relative importance (%IRI) in 488 stomach contents of the three M. hubbsi size groups (<250 mm, 250–300 mm, >300 mm Lt). Numbers above columns indicate the absolute frequency of occurrence.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Box plot of THg concentrations (ng g−1) for each length class of M. hubbsi landed in Niterói-Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, between May 2013 and April 2014. Letters indicate significant differences among length classes (P < 0.05).

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Correlation between total length (mm) and δ13C (‰) (A), total length (mm) and δ15N (‰) (B), total length (Lt, mm) and total mercury (THg, ng g−1) (C) and total mercury (THg) and δ15N (‰) (D) of the three M. hubbsi size groups.

Figure 7

Table 2. Number of specimens analysed (N), length classes (Lt) and mean ± standard deviation (SD) of δ13C (‰), δ15N (‰) and THg levels of the three M. hubbsi size groups

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Stable isotope values of the three M. hubbsi size groups (Lt, mm). Lines depict the standard ellipse (the 95% confidence interval) for the isotopic niches.

Figure 9

Table 3. Quantitative niche metrics of the three M. hubbsi size groups (Lt, mm) NR, δ15N range; CR, δ13C range; TA, total occupied niche area; CD, distance to centroid; MNND, mean nearest neighbour distance; SDNND, standard deviation of nearest neighbour distances; SEA, standard ellipse area

Figure 10

Table 4. Overlap proportions (%) between the three M. hubbsi size groups (Lt, mm)