Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2rsb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T23:54:22.997Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Overcoming sternal compression: high-risk transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2025

Stephen Dalby*
Affiliation:
Arkansas Children’s Hospital, Little Rock, AR, USASection of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
Markus S. Renno
Affiliation:
Arkansas Children’s Hospital, Little Rock, AR, USASection of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
Michael Angtuaco
Affiliation:
Arkansas Children’s Hospital, Little Rock, AR, USASection of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
*
Corresponding author: Stephen Dalby; Email: SDalby2@uams.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) is often employed for patients who are poor surgical candidates. We present a case of posterior sternal protrusion into a surgically placed right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit, making the patient a poor candidate for surgical replacement and leading to significant operator distress during ultimately successful TPVR.

Information

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1.Pre- and post-procedural imaging. (a),(b) Pre-procedure AP and sagittal projections of 3D model print; (c),(d) Pre-procedure axial and sagittal CT slices demonstrating sternal protrusion into conduit; (e),(f) Post-procedure 3D model print demonstrating stents within the leftward aspect of the conduit and left pulmonary artery; (g),(h) Post-procedure near coronal and sagittal CT slices (* = sternum).

Figure 1

Figure 2.Intraprocedural cineangiography. (a),(b) AP and lateral projections of cineangiography in the RV-PA conduit; (c),(d) AP and lateral projections of simultaneous aortic root angiography and balloon inflation in the RV-PA conduit demonstrating aortopulmonary fistula to the LPA; (e) Covered stent deployment in the proximal LPA; (f) Angiography demonstrating para-stent leak around sternum to the rightward aspect of conduit; (g),(h) Angiography following valve deployment demonstrating no residual insufficiency or paravalvular leak (* = LPA; arrow = para-stent leak).