Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T01:51:37.485Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High loss liquid dielectric characterization: Comparison of microwave waveguide and resonator measurement techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2020

Z. E. Eremenko*
Affiliation:
O. Ya. Usykov Institute for Radiophysics and Electronics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine
A. I. Shubnyi
Affiliation:
O. Ya. Usykov Institute for Radiophysics and Electronics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine
A. Y. Kogut
Affiliation:
O. Ya. Usykov Institute for Radiophysics and Electronics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine
R. S. Dolia
Affiliation:
O. Ya. Usykov Institute for Radiophysics and Electronics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine
*
Author for correspondence: Z. E. Eremenko, E-mail: zoya.eremenko@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The microwave waveguide and resonator methods are compared as applied to the experimental determination of the dielectric properties of high loss liquids. A differential microwave waveguide cavity for measuring high loss liquids complex permittivity in a small volume has been designed and studied. This cavity consists of two circular waveguide cells with central rods made of quartz and surrounded by high loss liquid tested. The cells have different lengths to eliminate complex propagation coefficient measurement errors due to the diffraction effect on the ends of the layered waveguide cells. We have measured the wave amplitude and phase coefficients for the waveguide cavity to estimate physical properties of a high loss liquid under test. The resonant frequencies and the Q-factor of a semi-disk dielectric resonator with high loss liquid filling a capillary have been measured. We have selected water-ethanol solutions as a high loss liquid under test for both techniques. We have determined the measurement sensitivity for these two techniques. The measuring results are discussed. Both the waveguide and resonator methods provide comparable sensitivity and can be successfully used for the complex permittivity characterization of high loss liquids in small volumes.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2020
Figure 0

Fig. 1. The longitudinal section of the cavity cell of the first modification (a), The cross-section of the measurement cavity (b). 1 is the differential cavity body; 2 is the dielectric rod; 3 is the high loss liquid; 4 is the rectangular waveguide of standard cross-section; 5 is the matching structure.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. The photos of our dielectrometer (a), the measurement cavity (b), the view of these two measurement cells of different lengths (c), and dielectric Teflon rods (d).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. A longitudinal section of the differential cavity cells of the second modification with different length of two cells.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Wave phase changes – pink curves (a,b) in the liquid sample and wave attenuation changes – blue curves (a, b) with respect to the water in the waveguide cell depending on the water-ethanol concentration C. Circles are for equal lengths of the two cells in the measurement cavity (see Fig. 1). Squares are for the cells with different lengths (see Fig. 3).

Figure 4

Fig. 5. The experimental semi-disk resonator cell: 1 – a semi-disk dielectric resonator, 2 – a copper mirror, 3 – a Teflon capillary with the liquid under test, 4 – an open end of the metal waveguide.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. The behavior of the frequency and attenuation of the output signal at filling the capillary with pure water (1); aqueous solutions of acetone 10% (2) and 30% (3); acetone (4); ethanol (5); and kerosene (6).

Figure 6

Fig. 7. The dependence of the resonant frequency change of the whispering gallery modes with different azimuthal indexes (m = 34 (curve 2); 35 (curve 3) and 36 (curve 1)) on the percentage C of the ethanol in the water solution.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. The dependence of the unloaded Q-factor (a) and their difference (b) with respect to Q0 of the semi-disk DR for the whispering gallery modes with different azimuthal indexes m = 34 (curve 2); 35 (curve 3); and 36 (curve 1) on the percentage C of the ethanol in the water solution.

Figure 8

Table 1. The sensitivity of waveguide and resonator methods.