Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-skzmx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T03:36:20.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A sensitivity study on the starting simulations of turbojet engines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2024

E. Güllü*
Affiliation:
Chief Engineering Department, TUSAŞ Engine Industries, Inc., Ankara, Turkey
G. Aran
Affiliation:
Chief Engineering Department, TUSAŞ Engine Industries, Inc., Ankara, Turkey
M. Erk
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey
Ö.U. Baran
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey
*
Corresponding author: E. Güllü; Email: gulluemrh@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Gas turbine engine starting models require a lot of calibration to represent reality with acceptable accuracy due to the lack of high-quality component rig data in the sub-idle region. A detailed sensitivity study is presented in this paper to guide such calibration efforts. A thermodynamic component-matching type transient model of a single-spool turbojet engine with shaft and heat-soakage dynamics is employed for this purpose. Turbomachinery component maps are extended to sub-idle using an in-house map smoothing tool and the strategies presented by Kurzke recently. These extension strategies make use of the correlations hidden in the already available regions of the maps and ensure physical consistency. However, they contain some uncertainty, even when an experimentally obtained zero-speed line is available. Combustor sub-idle efficiency, stability limits, and delay are taken from the literature. Due to the chaotic nature of a combustor in the sub-idle region, a precise prediction of the combustor efficiency seems impossible. Effects of uncertainties related to sub-idle turbomachinery map extensions, burner efficiency, and heat soakage are investigated in this paper. Two popular fuel control strategies are employed and compared to see how controls deal with these uncertainties. It is concluded that turbomachinery torque characteristics and turbine capacities are the most important parameters when calibrating a starting model with a control based on rotational acceleration while burner efficiency and heat soakage are added on top of these with a control based on fuel flow rate.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society
Figure 0

Figure 1. The initial guess procedure used for a compressor.

Figure 1

Figure 2. A compressor sub-idle map extended using the above-explained methodology.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Burner efficiency (left) and burner stability (right) curves used in this study.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Transient component matching algorithm.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Min-max type fuel control strategy employed in this study.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Single-spool turbojet configuration.

Figure 6

Figure 7. Extended compressor map with different ${k_1}$ values.

Figure 7

Figure 8. Extended turbine map.

Figure 8

Figure 9. Steady-state operating, cranking and windmilling lines.

Figure 9

Figure 10. Limits used to define an initial fuel schedule for $\dot N/{\delta _2}$ and ${w_f}/{P_3}$ control strategies.

Figure 10

Figure 11. Transient analysis results using $\dot N/{\delta _2}$ control.

Figure 11

Figure 12. Operating line, speed profile and temperature profiles for different turbine capacities using $\dot N/{\delta _2}$ control.

Figure 12

Figure 13. Operating line, speed profile and temperature profiles for different compressor capacities using ${w_f}/{P_3}$ control. Five per cent more capacity case hangs.

Figure 13

Figure 14. Operating line, speed profile and temperature profiles for different burner efficiencies using ${w_f}/{P_3}$ control.

Figure 14

Figure 15. Operating line, speed profile and temperature profiles for different compressor torque characteristics using $\dot N/{\delta _2}$ control.

Figure 15

Figure 16. Operating line, speed profile and temperature profiles for different turbine torque characteristics using ${w_f}/{P_3}$ control. Five per cent less turbine torque case hangs.

Figure 16

Table 1. Summary of the sensitivity study using $\dot N/{\delta _2}$ control

Figure 17

Table 2. Summary of the sensitivity study using ${w_f}/{P_3}$ control