Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T10:28:35.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

War impact on mental health and well-being among Ukrainian and Israeli women: A cross-national comparison

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2025

Alexander Reznik
Affiliation:
Regional Alcohol and Drug Abuse Research (RADAR) Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be’er Sheva, Israel
Valentyna Pavlenko
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Psychology, V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine
Anton Kurapov
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine
Liudmyla Zavatska
Affiliation:
Department of Social Work, Educational and Pedagogical Sciences, T.H. Shevchenko National University “Chernihiv Colehium”, Chernihiv, Ukraine
Nataliia Korchakova
Affiliation:
Department of Developmental & Pedagogical Psychology, Rivne State University of Humanities, Rivne, Ukraine
Iuliia Pavlova
Affiliation:
Department of Theory and Methods of Physical Culture, Lviv State University of Physical Culture, Lviv, Ukraine
Shai-li Romem-Porat
Affiliation:
Regional Alcohol and Drug Abuse Research (RADAR) Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be’er Sheva, Israel
Richard Isralowitz*
Affiliation:
Regional Alcohol and Drug Abuse Research (RADAR) Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be’er Sheva, Israel
*
Corresponding author: Richard Isralowitz; Email: Richard@bgu.ac.il
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study aims to discern similarities and differences associated with the impact of war on Ukrainian and Israeli women. We hypothesize that country affiliation significantly determines their mental health and psycho-emotional well-being. A total of 1,071 Ukrainian (N = 601) and Israeli (N = 470) women were surveyed online from September to December 2022 in Ukraine and November 2023 to March 2024 in Israel. Valid and reliable survey instruments were used to gather data about the fear of war, depression, loneliness, suicidal ideation and substance misuse. Fear of war and depression were higher among Israeli respondents. However, Ukrainian women reported more loneliness, substance use and psycho-emotional deterioration. Respondents from both countries did not show a different level of suicidal ideation. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) results show fear of war associated with country and depression; and depression linked to country and increased alcohol use, especially among Ukrainian respondents. Comparative results partially confirm the study hypothesis. The impact of the war on Ukrainian and Israeli women has similar effects; however, differences exist that may be attributed to culture and adaptation to war length. Further research, including uniform data collection and analysis, is needed to determine the impact of war on women as well as their familial and work-related responsibilities that tend to increase during such conditions.

Information

Type
Rapid Communication
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Demographic data

Figure 1

Figure 1. Depression level by country.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Fear of war by country and depression level.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Depression by country and increase alcohol use.

Author comment: War impact on mental health and well-being among Ukrainian and Israeli women: A cross-national comparison — R0/PR1

Comments

Dear Dr. Bass, Dr. Makhashvili and Ms. Lane

Colleagues from universities in the Ukraine and Israel have prepared a paper for Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health (GMH) “RAPID Communication” publication consideration titled “War impact on mental health and wellbeing among Ukrainian and Israeli women: A cross-national comparison.” Thank you for providing us the opportunity to submit the paper.

Our paper, based on survey research of more than 1,000 Ukrainian and Israeli women, examines country affiliation to determine its association with mental health factors of depression, loneliness, substance misuse and psycho-emotional well being. The paper has policy and program implications associated with civilians in disaster and war conditions.

Best,

Richard Isralowitz, PhD., M.Sc.

US National Institute on Drug Abuse - Distinguished International Scientist

Director - Regional Alcohol and Drug Abuse Research Center

Professor (Emeritus)

Ben Gurion University of the Negev

Review: War impact on mental health and well-being among Ukrainian and Israeli women: A cross-national comparison — R0/PR2

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

The article is very interesting; however, there are some comments to improve it:

1. In the introduction, it is necessary to explain the cultural differences between the countries. For example, Israel is a country that has been through wars throughout its existence, surrounded by enemies on all borders and even within its borders. There is mandatory military service in the IDF, including for women, and Israel has financial stability, etc.

2. In the Methods section, it is necessary to add the analysis methods and the reasoning for their selection, how the online questionnaires were distributed, the age range of the participants, and whether women from both the north and south of Israel participated. Regarding Ukraine, there is a detailed explanation, but there is none for Israel.

3. Ethical aspects – It is very strange that the researchers did not require approval from an ethics committee in Israel given the anonymity of the questionnaires. After all, most studies are anonymous and still require approval. It would be advisable for the researchers to attach the letter from the ethics committee that approved this in an appendix.

4. Page 8, Line 16 in the Discussion – It is necessary to elaborate on the cultural and social differences that created the disparities in the results. This is precisely the essence of comparative research. In general, the researchers do not discuss all the findings in depth, and the Discussion section should be expanded.

5. The Conclusions section is missing, and there are no practical recommendations for women in conflict areas.

Review: War impact on mental health and well-being among Ukrainian and Israeli women: A cross-national comparison — R0/PR3

Conflict of interest statement

General Comments The manuscript presents an important and timely study on the mental health impact of war on Ukrainian and Israeli women. The topic is highly relevant, and the comparative approach is valuable. However, several key areas need improvement before publication. 1. Conceptual and Theoretical Issues The paper would benefit from including more literature on the effects of war on mental health, especially in gendered contexts. Cultural and contextual differences between Ukraine and Israel are mentioned but not deeply explored. Consider discussing how social, political, and historical factors shape mental health responses. 2. Statistical and Analytical Concerns Please include effect sizes and confidence intervals to give a clearer picture of the findings. Some key factors, like socioeconomic status, trauma history, military service (for Israeli respondents), and whether respondents are native-born or immigrants, are not controlled for. These could significantly impact results. The use of Two-Way ANOVA is not well justified. Would a regression model or a more nuanced approach be more suitable? 3. Discussion and Organization The discussion section feels a bit scattered. A clearer structure would help readers follow the key takeaways. Some conclusions feel a little speculative (e.g., attributing differences mainly to culture). It would be great to back these up with more data or references. The policy and intervention implications could be more developed. What practical recommendations can be made for mental health support in conflict settings? 4. Clarity and Formatting The writing is clear overall, but some sections repeat information. Tightening the text will improve readability. Final Recommendation: Major Revisions Needed. This study has great potential, but it needs some key refinements to strengthen the methodology, analysis, and discussion. Addressing these points will make the manuscript even stronger and more impactful.

Comments

General Comments

The manuscript presents an important and timely study on the mental health impact of war on Ukrainian and Israeli women. The topic is highly relevant, and the comparative approach is valuable. However, several key areas need improvement before publication.

1. Conceptual and Theoretical Issues

The paper would benefit from including more literature on the effects of war on mental health, especially in gendered contexts.

Cultural and contextual differences between Ukraine and Israel are mentioned but not deeply explored. Consider discussing how social, political, and historical factors shape mental health responses.

2. Statistical and Analytical Concerns

Please include effect sizes and confidence intervals to give a clearer picture of the findings.

Some key factors, like socioeconomic status, trauma history, military service (for Israeli respondents), and whether respondents are native-born or immigrants, are not controlled for. These could significantly impact results.

The use of Two-Way ANOVA is not well justified. Would a regression model or a more nuanced approach be more suitable?

3. Discussion and Organization

The discussion section feels a bit scattered. A clearer structure would help readers follow the key takeaways.

Some conclusions feel a little speculative (e.g., attributing differences mainly to culture). It would be great to back these up with more data or references.

The policy and intervention implications could be more developed. What practical recommendations can be made for mental health support in conflict settings?

4. Clarity and Formatting

The writing is clear overall, but some sections repeat information. Tightening the text will improve readability.

Final Recommendation: Major Revisions Needed.

This study has great potential, but it needs some key refinements to strengthen the methodology, analysis, and discussion. Addressing these points will make the manuscript even stronger and more impactful.

Recommendation: War impact on mental health and well-being among Ukrainian and Israeli women: A cross-national comparison — R0/PR4

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: War impact on mental health and well-being among Ukrainian and Israeli women: A cross-national comparison — R0/PR5

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: War impact on mental health and well-being among Ukrainian and Israeli women: A cross-national comparison — R1/PR6

Comments

February 20, 2025

Dear Prof. Dixon Chibanda - Editor-in-Chief, Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health

Thank you for your letter dated Feb 10, 2025. The co-authors of the article appreciate the reviewers’ comments.

Colleagues from universities in the Ukraine and Israel have revised the paper for Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health (GMH) “RAPID Communication” titled “War impact on mental health and wellbeing among Ukrainian and Israeli women: A cross-national comparison.”

Our paper, based on survey research of more than 1,000 Ukrainian and Israeli women, examines country affiliation to determine its association with mental health factors of depression, loneliness, substance misuse and psycho-emotional well-being. The paper has policy and program implications associated with civilians in disaster and war conditions.

Best,

Richard Isralowitz, PhD., M.Sc.

US National Institute on Drug Abuse - Distinguished International Scientist

Director - Regional Alcohol and Drug Abuse Research Center

Professor (Emeritus)

Ben Gurion University of the Negev

Review: War impact on mental health and well-being among Ukrainian and Israeli women: A cross-national comparison — R1/PR7

Conflict of interest statement

No Competing Interests

Comments

N/A

Recommendation: War impact on mental health and well-being among Ukrainian and Israeli women: A cross-national comparison — R1/PR8

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: War impact on mental health and well-being among Ukrainian and Israeli women: A cross-national comparison — R1/PR9

Comments

No accompanying comment.