Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T06:11:58.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How phenotype guides management of the neuroendocrine carcinomas of the larynx

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2018

F López*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain University Institute of Oncology of Asturias (‘IUOPA’), University of Oviedo, Spain Health Research Institute of the Principado de Asturias and Biomedical Research Networking Centre Consortium for Oncology (‘CIBERONC’), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Oviedo, Spain
J L Hunt
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA
I J Nixon
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
A Rinaldo
Affiliation:
University of Udine School of Medicine, Udine, Italy
M D Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
A Cardesa
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomic Pathology, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Spain
A Ferlito
Affiliation:
Coordinator of the International Head and Neck Scientific Group, Padua, Italy*
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Fernando López, Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Avenida de Roma s/n, 33011 – Oviedo (Asturias), Spain E-mail: flopez_1981@yahoo.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

This review aimed to critically analyse data pertaining to the clinical presentation and treatment of neuroendocrine carcinomas of the larynx.

Method

A PubMed search was performed using the term ‘neuroendocrine carcinoma’. English-language articles on neuroendocrine carcinoma of the larynx were reviewed in detail.

Results and conclusion

While many historical classifications have been proposed, in contemporary practice these tumours are sub-classified into four subtypes: carcinoid, atypical carcinoid, small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. These tumours exhibit a wide range of biological behaviour, ranging from the extremely aggressive nature of small and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas, which usually have a fatal prognosis, to the less aggressive course of carcinoid tumours. In small and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas, a combination of irradiation and chemotherapy is indicated, while carcinoid and atypical carcinoid tumour management entails conservation surgery.

Information

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited, 2018 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Carcinoid tumour. (a) A submucosal mass is seen involving the right aryepiglottic fold on stroboscopy (arrows). (b) The tumour cells are uniform, growing in nests without mitoses, necrosis or atypia (H&E; ×200).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Atypical carcinoid tumour. (a) A submucosal mass of spindled cells with mild nuclear variability (H&E; ×200). (b) Another example with more oncocytic cytoplasm, variable nuclear hyperchromasia and increased anaplasia with occasional mitoses (H&E; ×200).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. (a) A low power micrograph shows an infiltrating tumour with extensive necrosis (lower right side of image, arrows) (H&E; ×40). (b) The tumour cells overlap without clear cytoplasmic borders. Nuclei are hyperchromic with numerous mitoses, and apoptotic bodies (H&E; ×200).

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. (a) Sagittal computed tomography image shows a pedunculated mass of the epiglottis (within dotted circle). (b) Microscopic overview of the resection specimen, with the pedunculated tumour arising from the epiglottic surface with underlying cartilage (H&E; ×10). (c) Neoplastic cells are hyperchromatic, overlapping with enlarged nuclei, apoptotic bodies, mitoses and focal necrosis (H&E; ×200). (d) Tumour cells show expression for chromogranin (immunohistochemical evaluation; ×200).