Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T10:34:11.057Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Temperature as a key factor for successful inoculation of soybean with Bradyrhizobium spp. under cool growing conditions in Belgium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2018

J. Pannecoucque*
Affiliation:
Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Crop Husbandry, Soil and Environment, Burg. Van Gansberghelaan 109, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
S. Goormachtigh
Affiliation:
Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Crop Husbandry, Soil and Environment, Burg. Van Gansberghelaan 109, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
J. Ceusters
Affiliation:
KU Leuven, Department of Microbial and Molecular Systems, Faculty of Engineering Technology, Technology Campus Geel, Kleinhoefstraat 4, 2440 Geel, Belgium
J. Debode
Affiliation:
Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Crop Protection, Burg. Van Gansberghelaan 96, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
C. Van Waes
Affiliation:
Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Crop Husbandry, Soil and Environment, Burg. Van Gansberghelaan 109, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
J. Van Waes
Affiliation:
Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Crop Husbandry, Soil and Environment, Burg. Van Gansberghelaan 109, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
*
Author for correspondence: J. Pannecoucque, E-mail: joke.pannecoucque@ilvo.vlaanderen.be
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bacterial inoculation of soybean seeds to improve biological nitrogen fixation is a well-known practice to achieve higher seed and protein yield with reduced fertilization. The optimal inoculation strategy in temperate regions is unknown because soybeans are rarely cultivated under colder growing conditions. The aim of the present work was to determine the most suitable inoculation strategy for soybean cultivation in Belgium. Field trials were set up with four Bradyrhizobium inoculants (HiStick, Force 48, Biodoz and Optimize) at two locations over 2 years (2014–2015) and compared with a non-inoculated control treatment. In addition, HiStick was tested at three doses and Optimize at two time periods prior to sowing. Under Belgian conditions, all inoculants were effective in establishing rhizobial symbiosis, resulting in increased yield, protein content, protein yield and thousand-grain weight compared with the non-inoculated control. A single dose of HiStick was sufficient to establish symbiosis. Pre-inoculation with Optimize 2 weeks before sowing gave an intermediate performance for most parameters between the non-inoculated control treatment and inoculation with Optimize 24 h prior to sowing. Among the four products tested, Biodoz seemed the best product for inoculation under cool growing conditions. Based on the atpD gene, the bacterial strain of Biodoz showed complete similarity with Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens, while strains of other products were identified as Bradyrhizobium japonicum. In vitro growing capacity of the Biodoz strain at 8 °C was higher compared with the other strains. Better cold adaptation of the Biodoz strain might be a possible explanation for the better performance of Biodoz in Belgium.

Information

Type
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 
Figure 0

Table 1. Overview of inoculation strategies tested in the field experiments

Figure 1

Table 2. Description of the field trials conducted on two soil types: sandy soil (Geel) and sandy-loam soil (Merelbeke) during 2 years (2014 and 2015) including soil fertility, fertilization, sowing date, herbicides, harvesting time and soil parameters

Figure 2

Table 3. Main effects and interactions for nodule number per plant, nodule dry weight per plant (g), moisture content at harvest (%), seed yield (kg/ha dry matter (DM)), dry matter protein content (g/kg DM), protein yield (kg/ha DM), thousand-grain weight (g) and dry matter oil content (g/kg DM) at the sandy soil site in Geel (2014–2015)

Figure 3

Table 4. Mean values for nodule number per plant, nodule dry weight per plant (g), moisture content at harvest (%), seed yield (kg/ha dry mater (DM)), dry matter protein content (g/kg DM), protein yield (kg/ha DM), thousand-grain weight (g) and dry matter oil content (g/kg DM) at the sandy soil site in Geel (2014–2015) as influenced by inoculation strategy (I), variety (V) and year (Y)

Figure 4

Table 5. Main effects and interactions for nodule number per plant, nodule dry weight per plant (g), moisture content at harvest (%), seed yield (kg/ha dry matter (DM)), dry matter protein content (g/kg DM), protein yield (kg/ha DM), thousand-grain weight (g) and dry matter oil content (g/kg DM) at the sandy-loam soil site in Merelbeke (2014–2015)

Figure 5

Table 6. Mean values for nodule number per plant, nodule dry weight per plant (g), moisture content at harvest (%), seed yield (kg/ha DM), dry matter protein content (g/kg DM), protein yield (kg/ha DM), thousand-grain weight (g) and dry matter oil content (g/kg DM) at the sandy-loam soil site in Merelbeke (2014–2015) as influenced by inoculation strategy (I), variety (V) and year (Y)

Figure 6

Table 7. Taxonomic nomenclature for the bacterial strains of each inoculant and reference strain LMG 61-38T by performing a BLAST search for the 16S gene region and the atpD gene sequence; the first two BLAST hits with complete query cover and complete identity cover are shown

Figure 7

Fig. 1. The increased population density of Bradyrhizobium spp. relative to the start population density from the strains of three inoculant products and reference strain LMG 61-38T at five growth temperatures. Values are means (n = 8) ± s.e. Bars with the same letters are not significantly different as determined by Tukey's HSD test at P < 0.05.