Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T05:46:00.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Irradiation responses and defect behavior of single-phase concentrated solid solution alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2018

Tengfei Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
Congyi Li
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
Steven J. Zinkle*
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA; and Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
Shijun Zhao
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
Hongbin Bei
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
Yanwen Zhang
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA; and Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: szinkle@utk.edu

Abstract

Single-phase concentrated solid solution alloys (SP-CSAs) are newly emerging advanced structural materials, which are defined as multiprincipal element solid solutions. SP-CSAs with more than four components in equimolar or near-equimolar ratios are also referred to as high-entropy alloys due to their high configurational entropy. SP-CSAs are potential structural materials in advanced nuclear energy systems due to their attractive mechanical properties. Therefore many investigations have been carried out to study the irradiation-induced structural damage and defect behavior in SP-CSAs. This paper reviews recent experimental results on the irradiation responses of various SP-CSAs, focusing on the accumulation of irradiation-induced structural damage, void swelling resistance, and solute segregation behavior. In addition, the characteristic defect behavior in SP-CSAs derived from ab initio and molecular dynamics simulations, as well as the challenges in the applications of SP-CSAs for the nuclear energy systems are briefly discussed.

Information

Type
Invited Review
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. RBS-C results of (a) Ni, NiCo, and NiFe irradiated with 3 MeV Au at 1 × 1013 cm−2 (Ref. 21) (reprinted with permission from Ref. 21; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode); (b) Ni, NiFe, and NiCoFeCr irradiated with 1.5 MeV Ni at 1 × 1014 cm−2 (Ref. 21) (reprinted with permission from Ref. 21; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). RBS-C results of NixFe1−x (0 < x < 60 at.%) irradiated with 1.5 MeV Ni at (c) 1 × 1014 cm−2 and (d) 3 × 1015 cm−2 (Ref. 31) (reprinted with permission from Ref. 31).

Figure 1

FIG. 2. MD simulation results showing (a) defect structures in Ni and NiFe at a dose of 0.5 dpa and (b) the distributions of defect cluster sizes in Ni, NiFe, and NiCoCr at the dose from ∼0.4 dpa to the end30 (reprinted with permission from Ref. 30; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode); (c) the number of surviving displaced atoms as a function of Fe concentration in the Ni–xFe alloys at three different doses.31 (reprinted with permission from Ref. 31).

Figure 2

FIG. 3. Irradiation-induced volume swelling in Ni-containing equiatomic alloys irradiated with 3 MeV Ni to 5 × 1016 cm−2 at 500 °C, including (a) optical profilometer measurements of the surface swelling37 (reprinted with permission from Ref. 37); (b) comparison of step-height and overall swelling of Ni and six Ni-containing equiatomic alloys37 (reprinted with permission from Ref. 37); (c) cross-sectional TEM images.22 (reprinted with permission from Ref. 22).

Figure 3

FIG. 4. MD simulation results of defect migration in (a) Ni at 800 K, (b) NiCo at 1200 K, and (c) NiFe at 1200 K.22 (reprinted with permission from Ref. 22).

Figure 4

FIG. 5. Comparison of the evolution of irradiation-induced dislocation loops with temperature between FeNiMnCr HEA and other conventional alloys, including ternary Fe–Cr–Ni austenitic alloys, 316 stainless steels, and so on.41 The data sources of as-irradiated conventional alloys can be found in Ref. 41. (reprinted with permission from Ref. 41).

Figure 5

FIG. 6. Cross-sectional TEM images and corresponding SAED patterns of Al0.1CoCrFeNi irradiated with 3 MeV Au to 6 × 1015 cm−2 at (a) 250 °C; (b) 350 °C; (c) 500 °C; and (d) 650 °C, respectively. APT results of 55 at.% Ni + Co iso-concentration surfaces of Al0.1CoCrFeNi irradiated at the four different temperatures are also given. The deposited Au ions are marked by background contrast. The disk-shaped and ring-shaped dislocation loops are marked by arrows and rectangles, respectively.42 (reprinted with permission from Ref. 42).

Figure 6

FIG. 7. BF TEM images of (a) NiFe; (b) NiCoFe; (c) NiCoFeCr; and (d) NiCoFeCrMn irradiated with 3 MeV Ni up to 38 ± 5 dpa at 500 °C.35 (reprinted with permission from Ref. 35).

Figure 7

FIG. 8. Ab initio calculation results: (a) Formation energies of a [100] dumbbell in Ni0.5Fe0.5 (left column) and Ni0.8Fe0.2 (right column); (b) Formation energies of vacancy in four Ni-based binary SP-CSAs as a function of the number of its nearest neighbor pair (m, n), where m is the number of Ni and n is the number of Fe or Cr49 (reprinted with permission from Ref. 49). Migration barriers of interstitials and vacancies in (c) NiCoCr and (d) NiCoFeCr.50 (reprinted with permission from Ref. 50).

Figure 8

FIG. 9. Tracer diffusion coefficients due to (a) interstitial atom and (b) vacancy diffusion in NiFe; (c) the formation energies of interstitial dumbbells and (d) vacancy migration energy.60 (reprinted with permission from Ref. 60).

Supplementary material: File

Yang et al. supplementary material

Figures S1-S3

Download Yang et al. supplementary material(File)
File 2.6 MB