Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T23:27:27.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Knowledge of grammar includes knowledge of syntactic probabilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2026

Susanne Gahl  and
Susan Garnsey
Susanne Gahl*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois
Susan Garnsey*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois
*
University of Chicago, Department of Psychology, 5848 S. University Ave., Chicago, IL 60637, [gahl@uchicago.edu], [sgarnsey@psych.uiuc.edu]
University of Chicago, Department of Psychology, 5848 S. University Ave., Chicago, IL 60637, [gahl@uchicago.edu], [sgarnsey@psych.uiuc.edu]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Discussion Notes
Information
Language , Volume 82 , Issue 2 , June 2006 , pp. 405 - 410
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Cho, Taehong. 2004. Prosodically conditioned strengthening and vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in English. Journal of Phonetics 32.2.141–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, Louise, and Keane, Mark T.. 2004. What plausibly affects plausibility? Concept coherence and distributional word coherence as factors influencing plausibility judgments. Memory & Cognition 32.2.185–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dell, Gary S., Reed, Kristopher D., Adams, David R.; and Meyer, Antje S.. 2000. Speech errors, phonotactic constraints, and implicit learning: A study of the role of experience in language production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26.6.1355–67.Google ScholarPubMed
Ferretti, Todd R., and McRae, Ken. 1999. Modeling the role of plausibility and verb-bias in the direct-object/sentence complement ambiguity. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, ed. by Hahn, M. and Stoness, S. C., 161–66. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gahl, Susanne, and Garnsey, Susan M.. 2004. Knowledge of grammar, knowledge of usage: Syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation variation. Language 80. 748–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gahl, Susanne, Jurafsky, Daniel; and Roland, Douglas. 2004. Verb subcategorization frequencies: American English corpus data, methodological studies, and cross-corpus comparisons. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 36.3.432–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garnsey, Susan M., Pearlmutter, Neal J., Myers, Elizabeth; and Lotocky, Melanie A.. 1997. The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory & Language 37.1.58–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, Jeff, and Gibson, Edward. 2004. Measuring linguistic complexity independent of plausibility. Language 80. 583–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, Mary L., McRae, Ken; and Elman, Jeffrey L.. 2003. Sense and structure: Meaning as a determinant of verb subcategorization preferences. Journal of Memory & Language 48. 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaschak, Michael P., and Glenberg, Arthur M.. 2004. This construction needs learned. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133.3.450–67.Google ScholarPubMed
Lavandera, Beatriz R. 1978. Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop? Language in Society 7. 171–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKoon, Gail, and MacFarland, Talke. 2000. Externally and internally caused change of state verbs. Language 76. 833–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2003. Grammar is grammar and usage is usage. Language 79. 682–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2006. On Gahl and Garnsey on grammar and usage. Language 82.XX-XX.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onishi, Kris, Chambers, Kyle; and Fisher, Cynthia. 2002. Learning phonotactic constraints from brief auditory experience. Cognition 83.B13-B23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roland, Douglas William. 2002. Verb sense and verb subcategorization probabilities. Boulder: University of Colorado, Boulder dissertation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roland, Douglas, Jurafsky, Daniel, Menn, Lise, Gahl, Susanne, Elder, Elizabeth; and Riddoch, Chris. 2000. Verb subcategorization frequency differences between business-news and balanced corpora: The role of verb sense. Paper presented at the Workshop on Comparing Corpora, Hong Kong, October 2000.Google Scholar
Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie, and Turk, Alice E.. 1996. A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 25.2.193–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trueswell, John C., Tanenhaus, Michael K.; and Garnsey, Susan M.. 1994. Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory & Language 33.3.285–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trueswell, John C., Tanenhaus, Michael K.; and Kello, Christopher. 1993. Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 19.3.528–53.Google ScholarPubMed
Wightman, Colin W., Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie, Ostendorf, Mari; and Price, Patti J.. 1992. Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91.3.1707–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

A correction has been issued for this article:

Correction