Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T02:48:51.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of gelatin gel strength on microstructures and mechanical properties of cellular ceramics created by gelation freezing route

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Manabu Fukushima*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Nagoya 463-8560, Japan
Tatsuki Ohji
Affiliation:
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Nagoya 463-8560, Japan
Hideki Hyuga
Affiliation:
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Nagoya 463-8560, Japan
Chika Matsunaga
Affiliation:
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Nagoya 463-8560, Japan
Yu-ichi Yoshizawa
Affiliation:
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Nagoya 463-8560, Japan
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: manabu-fukushima@aist.go.jp

Abstract

Macroporous ceramics having unique pore morphologies with ceramic bridges, unidirectional cellular pores, and bamboo-like cells were fabricated by freezing gels with ceramic powder and various gelatin contents. Varying gel strengths were found to be effective for control of the pore architecture from open to closed pore channels. The proposed process is a relatively simple and versatile way to produce tailored pore configurations via a gelation freezing route. In addition, the relationship between the microstructure and mechanical properties of the resulting ceramics was discussed using a multiscale modeling technique, in which a homogenization method was conducted with microscopic models created from three dimensional images, global stress distributions in macroscopic samples by finite element method and local stress distributions. The simulation results were relatively consistent with the experimental results. The multiscale modeling technique was thus confirmed to be a strong tool for the prediction of the mechanical responses of porous ceramics.

Information

Type
Invited Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. Bloom gel strength of pure gelatin gels with and without dispersants and defoaming agents, and of gelatin gels with alumina particles as a function of gelatin concentration.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. Typical SEM micrographs of (a,d) A1, (b,e) A3, and (c,f) A5 samples, viewed in (a–c) parallel and (d–f) perpendicular to the freezing direction indicated by the arrows.

Figure 2

TABLE I. Porosity and compressive strength for the samples.

Figure 3

FIG. 3. Flowchart for the homogenization analysis of a microscopic model, stress distribution of a macroscopic model, including typical examples of 3D images of the A3 sample and the microscopic model composed of voxel meshes.

Figure 4

FIG. 4. Homogenized elastic constants (shown as “S”) for the microscopic models and experimental data (shown as “Ex”) for the A1, A3, and A5 samples.

Figure 5

FIG. 5. (a and b) Typical examples of macroscopic stress distributions (σz) by the FEM analysis and (c) stress–strain curves obtained by simulation (S) and experiments (Ex).

Figure 6

FIG. 6. The histogram of stress distribution in the microscopic unit of (a) A1, (b) A3, and (c) A5.