Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T23:31:54.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chemical cues from the coffee berry borer influence the locomotory behaviour of its bethylid parasitoids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2010

P. Chiu-Alvarado
Affiliation:
Departamento de Entomología Tropical, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR), Carretera Antiguo Aeropuerto Km 2.5, Tapachula, Chiapas, México Department of Zoology, Oxford University, South Park Rd, OxfordOX1 3PS, UK
J. Valle-Mora
Affiliation:
Departamento de Entomología Tropical, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR), Carretera Antiguo Aeropuerto Km 2.5, Tapachula, Chiapas, México
J.C. Rojas*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Entomología Tropical, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR), Carretera Antiguo Aeropuerto Km 2.5, Tapachula, Chiapas, México
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +52 962628906 E-mail: jrojas@ecosur.mx
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cephalonomia stephanoderis and Prorops nasuta are two bethylid wasps released into several Latin American countries for classical biological control of coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei, the most serious insect pest of coffee worldwide. Recent studies on the host location behaviour of these parasitoids have shown that females of both species are attracted to volatile compounds released by immature stages and dust and frass of H. hampei. In this study, we investigated the role of the contact chemicals present in dust and frass of H. hampei on the behaviour of P. nasuta and C. stephanoderis females. Parasitoids remained longer on patches treated with methanol extracts than on acetone and hexane extracts. Females spent more time on the patch treated with the methanol extract of dust and frass than on the patches treated with the methanol extract of dry coffee and methanol control. The concentration of the methanol extracts from dust and frass influenced the locomotory activity of parasitoids of both species. The time that females spent in the patch tended to increase as the concentration of the methanol extracts increased. A further experiment aimed to identify other behavioural descriptors and gain a deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying the response of parasitoids to methanol extracts was performed. Females of both species spent more time, covered more distance, turned more (per unit time and per unit distance), and decreased their speed when they contacted patches treated with methanol extracts in comparison to patches treated with methanol control.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Behavioural response of parasitoids (a) Cephalonomia stephanoderis and (b) Porops nasuta to methanol, acetone and hexane extracts from dust and frass of Hypothenemus hampei. Bars with the same letter are not statistically different from each other, P<0.05 (Tukey HSD). Values are mean+SE.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Behavioural response of parasitoids (a) Cephalonomia stephanoderis and (b) Prorops nasuta to fractions of hexane extracts from dust and frass of Hypothenemus hampei. Bars with the same letter are not statistically different from each other, P<0.05 (Tukey HSD). Values are mean+SE.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Behavioural response of parasitoids (a) Cephalonomia stephanoderis and (b) Prorops nasuta to methanol extracts from dust and frass of Hypothenemus hampei and dry coffee (Coffea arabica), or control. Bars with the same letter are not statistically different from each other, P<0.05 (Tukey HSD). Values are mean+SE.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Behavioural response of parasitoids (a) Cephalonomia stephanoderis and (b) Prorops nasuta to different concentrations of methanol extracts from dust and frass of Hypothenemus hampei. Bars with the same letter are not statistically different from each other, P<0.05 (Tukey HSD). Values are mean+SE.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Behavioural response of parasitoids (a) Cephalonomia stephanoderis and (b) Prorops nasuta to methanol extracts from dust and frass of berries with different degree of colonization of Hypothenemus hampei (see text for explanation). Bars with the same letter are not statistically different from each other, P<0.05 (Tukey HSD). Values are mean+SE.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Typical examples of recorded tracks of (a, b) Cephalonomia stephanoderis and (c, d) Prorops nasuta females in an experimental arena (9 cm diameter, inner circle, 3 cm diameter) over a 5-min run. Zones treated with (b, d) methanol extracts from Hypothenemus hampei dust and frass and (a, c) solvent control.

Figure 6

Table 1. Locomotory activity of Cephalonomia stephanoderis females in patches treated with methanol extract of Hypothenemus hampei dust and frass or methanol.

Figure 7

Table 2. Locomotory activity of Prorops nasuta females in patches treated with methanol extract of Hypothenemus hampei dust and frass or methanol.