Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T02:36:24.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Specificity is always contingent on constraints: Globalversus individual arrays is not the issue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2001

Sverker Runeson ,
David M. Jacobs ,
Isabell E. K. Andersson  and
Kairi Kreegipuu
Sverker Runeson
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala SE 75142, Sweden sverker.runeson@psyk.uu.se isabell.andersson@psyk.uu.se www.psyk.uu.se
David M. Jacobs
Affiliation:
Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam 1081 BT, The Netherlands d_jacobs@fbw.vu.nl www.psyk.vu.nl
Isabell E. K. Andersson
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala SE 75142, Sweden sverker.runeson@psyk.uu.se isabell.andersson@psyk.uu.se www.psyk.uu.se
Kairi Kreegipuu
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Tartu, Tartu 50410, Estonia kairi@psych.ut.ee
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Stoffregen & Bardy's proposal that perceptual systems can useinformation defined across two or more sensory domains is valuableand urgent in its own right. However, their claim of exclusivevalidity for global-array information is superfluous and perpetuatedfor incorrect reasons. The seeming ambiguities of individual arraysemanate from failures to consider relevant ecological constraintsand higher-order variables.

Information

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , April 2001 , pp. 240 - 241
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press