Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T10:56:13.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Politics and Morality in State Abortion Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Rebecca J. Kreitzer
Rebecca J. Kreitzer*
Affiliation:
University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
*
Rebecca J. Kreitzer, University of Iowa, 341 Schaeffer Hall, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. Email: rebecca-kreitzer@uiowa.edu
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The number and variety of state policies regulating abortion each year is increasing. Opponents of abortion adopted a strategy of “legal but inaccessible” that has resulted in the passage of more than 700 state laws since the early 1990s. Despite being a very active area of policy making, we lack a coherent explanation for the proliferation of abortion policy. Scholars studying different policies at discrete moments in time have come to conflicting conclusions about how well theories of morality policy and representation explain abortion policy. Using an original dataset comprised of a near-universe of pro- and anti-abortion rights policy from 1973 to 2013, I establish the ways in which partisan control of the government and the moral preferences of constituents shape state policy. I find that anti-abortion rights policies are well explained by both theories but that pro-abortion rights policies are not well explained as a morality policy or with descriptive representation. In addition, I show the heterogeneous effect of representation across anti-abortion rights policies; Democratic women and governors decrease the probability of only certain anti-abortion rights policies.

Keywords

abortion policypolicy processgender policypublic policygender politicsidentity/group politicsrepresentation

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 2015, pp. 41 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adams, Greg D. 1997. “Abortion: Evidence of an Issue Evolution.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 718–37..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ainsworth, Scott H., and Hall, Thad E.. 2011. Abortion Politics in Congress: Strategic Incrementalism and Policy Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John H., and Rhode, David. 2001. “The Logic of Conditional Party Government.” In Congress Reconsidered, 7th ed., eds. L. C. Dodd and B. I. Oppenheimer. Washington, DC:Congressional Quarterly Press, 269–92.Google Scholar
Arceneaux, Kevin. 2002. “Direct Democracy and the Link between Public Opinion and State Abortion Policy.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 2 (4): 372–87..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies (ASARB). 2002. Religious Congregations and Membership Study, 2000 (State File). http://thearda.com/Archive/Files/Descriptions/RCMSST.aspGoogle Scholar
Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies (ASARB). 2010. Religious Congregations and Membership Study, 2010 (State File). http://thearda.com/Archive/Files/Descriptions/RCMSST10.aspGoogle Scholar
Berkman, Michael B., and O'Connor, Robert E.. 1993. “Do Women Legislators Matter? Female Legislators and State Abortion Policy.” American Politics Quarterly 21(1):102–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berry, Frances Stokes, and Berry, William D.. 1990. “State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis.” American Political Science Review 84 (2): 395–415..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehmke, Frederick J. 2009. “Approaches to Modeling the Adoption and Modification of Policies with Multiple Components.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 9 (2): 229–52..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boonstra, Heather D., and Nash, Elizabeth. 2014. “A Surge of State Abortion Restrictions Puts Providers—and the Women They Serve—in the Crosshairs.” Guttmacher Policy Review 17 (1): 9–15..Google Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, and Donovan, Todd. 2004. “Measuring the Effect of Direct Democracy on State Policy: Not all Initiatives Are Created Equal.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 4 (3): 345–63..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul, Sims-Butler, Kellie, Arceneaux, Kevin, and Johnson, Martin. 2002. “Public Opinion in the American States: New Perspectives Using National Survey Data.” American Journal of Political Science 46(1):173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bumpass, Larry L. 1997. “The Measurement of Public Opinion on Abortion: The Effects of Survey Design.” Family Planning Perspectives 29 (4): 177–80..CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camobreco, John F., and Barnello, Michelle A.. 2008. “Democratic Responsiveness and Policy Shock: The Case of State Abortion Policy.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 8 (1): 48–65..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmines, Edward G., and Woods, James. 2002. “The Role of Party Activists in the Evolution of the Abortion Issue.” Political Behavior 24 (4): 361–77..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Center for American Women in Politics (CAWP). 1973-2013. Women in State Legislatures. http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/fast_facts/resources/FactSheetArchive.php#stlegleadGoogle Scholar
Clifford, Scott, and Jerit, Jennifer. 2013. “How Words Do the Work of Politics: Moral Foundations Theory and the Debate over Stem Cell Research.” Journal of Politics 75 (3): 659–71..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey E., and Barrilleaux, Charles. 1993. “Public Opinion, Interest Groups and Public Policy Making: Abortion Policy in the American States.” In Understanding the New Politics of Abortion, ed. Goggin, M.. California: Sage, 203–221.Google Scholar
Cook, Elizabeth A., Jelen, Ted G., and Wilcox, Clyde. 1992. Between Two Absolutes: Public Opinion and the Politics of Abortion. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Fabrizio, Paul J. 2001. “Evolving into Morality Politics: U.S. Catholics Bishops' Statements on U.S. Politics from 1972 to the Present.” In The Public Clash of Private Values: The Politics of Morality Policy, ed. Mooney, Christopher Z.. New York, NY: Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar
Evans, John H. 2002. “Polarization in Abortion Attitudes in U.S. Religious Traditions, 1972–1998.” Sociological Forum 17:397–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Elizabeth R. 1996. “Legislative Response to the Threat of Popular Initiatives.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (1): 99–128..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenmary Research Center. 1974. Churches and Church Membership in the United States, 1971 (States). http://thearda.com/Archive/Files/Descriptions/CMS71ST.aspGoogle Scholar
Glenmary Research Center. 1982. Churches and Church Membership in the United States, 1980 (States). http://thearda.com/Archive/Files/Descriptions/CMS80ST.aspGoogle Scholar
Glenmary Research Center. 1992. Churches and Church Membership in the United States, 1990 (States). http://thearda.com/Archive/Files/Descriptions/CMS90ST.aspGoogle Scholar
Glick, Henry R., and Hutchinson, Amy. 2001. “Physician-Assisted Suicide: Agenda Setting and the Elements of Morality Policy.” In The Public Clash of Private Values: The Politics of Morality Policy, ed. Mooney, Cristopher Z.. New York: Chatham House Publishers, 55–70.Google Scholar
Graham, J. Haidt, and Nosek, Brain. 2009. “Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96:1029–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossback, Lawrence J., Nicholson-Crotty, Sean, and Peterson, David A. M.. 2004. “Ideology and Learning in Policy Diffusion.” American Politics Research 32 (5): 521–45..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttmacher Institute. 2014. State Data Center. http://www.guttmacher.org/datacenter/Google Scholar
Guttmacher Institute Report. 2013. “2012 Saw Second-Highest Number of Abortion Restrictions Ever.” http://www.guttmacher.org/media/inthenews/2013/01/02/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Haider-Markel, Donald P., and Meier, Kenneth J.. 1996. “The Politics of Gay and Lesbian Rights: Expanding the Scope of the Conflict.” Journal of Politics 58:332–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Susan B. 1993. “Differences in Public Policies Toward Abortion: Electoral and Policy Context.” In Understanding the New Politics of Abortion, ed. M. Goggin. Sage, 222-248.Google Scholar
Jelen, Ted G., and Wilcox, Clyde. 2003. “Causes and Consequences of Public Attitudes toward Abortion: A Review and Research Agenda.” Political Research Quarterly 56 (4): 489–500..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karch, Andrew, Nicholson-Crotty, Sean C., Woods, Neal D., and Bowman, Ann O'M.. 2013. “Policy Diffusion and the Pro-innovation Bias.” Presented at the 2013 State Politics and Policy Conference, Iowa City, May 24–25.Google Scholar
Klarner, Carl. 2003, Measurement of the Partisan Balance of State Government. State Politics & Policy Quarterly. 3(Fall):309–19. http://www.indstate.edu/polisci/klarnerpolitics.htmGoogle Scholar
Kreitzer, Rebecca, and Boehmke, Frederick J.. 2014. “Modeling Heterogeneity in Pooled Event History Analysis (PEHA)” Presented at the New Frontiers in Policy Diffusion Conference in Iowa City, IA 3/13/14-3/15/14.Google Scholar
Luker, Kristen. 1984. Abortion & the Politics of Motherhood. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Makse, Todd, and Volden, Craig. 2011. “The Role of Policy Attributes in the Diffusion of Innovations.” Journal of Politics 73 (1): 108–24..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medoff, Marshall H. 2002. “The Determinants and Impact of State Abortion Restrictions.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 61 (2): 481–93..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medoff, Marshall H., and Dennis, Christopher. 2011. “TRAP Abortion Laws and Partisan Political Party Control of State Government.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 70 (4): 951–73..CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medoff, Marshall H., Dennis, Christopher, and Stephens, Kerri. 2011. “The Impact of Party Control on the Diffusion of Parental Involvement Laws in the U.S.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 3:325–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J. 1994. The Politics of Sin: Drugs, Alcohol, and Public Policy. Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J. 2001. “Drugs, Sex, and Rock and Roll: A Theory of Morality Politics.” In The Public Clash of Private Values: The Politics of Morality Policy (21-34), ed. Mooney, C. Z.. New York: Chatham House Publishers, 21–24.Google Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., and McFarlane, Deborah R.. 1993. “Abortion Politics and Abortion Funding Policy.” In Understanding the New Politics of Abortion, ed. M. Goggin. Sage, 249-267.Google Scholar
Miladin, Joy. 2012. “Making History in Mississippi: State's Only Abortion Clinic May Close.” LiveAction News, June 25. http://liveactionnews.org/making-history-in-mississippi-states-only-abortion-clinic-may-close/Google Scholar
Mooney, Cristopher Z. 2001a. “Introduction.” In The Public Clash of Private Values: The Politics of Morality Policy, ed. Mooney, C. Z.. New York: Chatham House Publishers, 3–20.Google Scholar
Mooney, Cristopher Z. 2001b. “Modeling Regional Effects on State Policy Diffusion.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (1): 103–24..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, Cristopher Z., and Lee, Mei-Hsien. 1995. “Legislative Morality in the American States: The Case of Pre-Roe Abortion Regulation Reform.” American Journal of Political Science 39:599–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, Cristopher Z., and Lee, Mei-Hsien. 1999. “The Temporal Diffusion of Morality Policy: The Case of Death Penalty Legislation in the American States.” Policy Studies Journal 27 (4): 766–80..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, Christopher Z., and Lee, Mei-Hsien. 2001. “The Temporal Diffusion of Morality Policy: The Case of Death Penalty Legislation in the U.S.” In The Public Clash of Private Values: The Politics of Morality Policy, ed. Mooney, C. Z.. New York: Chatham House Publishers, 170–188.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. R., and Meier, Kenneth J.. 1980. “Politics and Morality: The Effect of Religion on Referenda Voting.” Social Science Quarterly 61 (1): 144–48..Google Scholar
Mouw, Ted, and Sobel, Michael E.. 2001. “Culture Wars and Opinion Polarization: The Case of Abortion.” American Journal of Sociology 106 (4): 919–43..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NARAL. 1992-2014. Who Decides: A State-by-State Review of Abortion Rights. Washington, DC: The NARAL Foundation. http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/assets/download-files/2014-who-decides.pdfGoogle Scholar
National Right to Life Committee, Department of State Legislation. 2014. U.S. State by State Prolife Laws Passed since 1973. http://www.nrlc.org/uploads/stateleg/StateAbortionLaws.pdfGoogle Scholar
New, Michael. 2013. “The Citizen Initiative, Public Opinion and Abortion Policy.” Presented at the State Politics and Policy Conference in Iowa City, May 23–25.Google Scholar
Nice, David C. 1988. “State Deregulation of Intimate Behavior.” Social Science Quarterly 69:203–11.Google Scholar
Norrander, Barbara. 2001. “Measuring State Public Opinion with the Senate National Election Study.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 1 (1): 111–25..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrander, Barbara, and Wilcox, Clyde. 1999. “Public Opinion and Policymaking in the States: The Case of Post-Roe Abortion Policy.” Policy Studies Journal 27 (4): 707–22..CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norrander, Barbara, and Wilcox, Clyde. 2001. “Public Opinion and Policymaking in the States: The Case of Post-Roe Abortion Policy.” In The Public Clash of Private Values: The Politics of Morality Policy, ed. Mooney, C. Z.. New York: Chatham House Publishers, 143–159.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Robert, and Berkman, Michael B.. 1995. “Religious Determinants of State Abortion Policy.” Social Science Quarterly 76:447–59.Google Scholar
Pacheco, Julianna. 2014. “Measuring and Evaluating Changes in State Opinion across Eight Issues.” American Political Research 42 (6): 986–1009..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Benjamin, and Shapiro, Robert. 1992. The Rational Public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, Dana. 2007. “The Supreme Court and Morality Policy: The Impact of Constitutional Context.” Political Research Quarterly 60 (3): 468–88..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, Patrick A., and Miller, Donald E.. 1999. “Variations in the Diffusion of State Lottery Adoptions: How Revenue Dedication Changes Morality Politics.” Policy Studies Journal 27 (4): 696–706..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992)Google Scholar
Rogers, Everett M. 1995. Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed. New York: The Free Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Ryan, Timothy J. 2014. “Reconsidering Moral Issues in Politics.” Journal of Politics 76 (2): 380–97..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2006. “Bottom-Up Federalism: The Diffusion of Antismoking Policies from U.S. Cities to States.” American Journal of Political Science 50:825–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Kevin B. 1994. “Abortion Attitudes and Vote Choice in the 1984 and 1988 Presidential Elections.” American Politics Quarterly 22:354–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strickland, Ruth Ann, and Whicker, Marcia Lynn. 1992. “Political and Socio-Economic Indicators of State Restrictiveness Toward Abortion.” Policy Studies Journal 20:598–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatalovich, Raymond, and Schier, David. 1993. “The Persistence of Ideological Cleavage in Voting on Abortion Legislation in the House of Representatives, 1973-1988.” American Politics Research 21(1):125–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, Jami K., Lewis, Daniel C., Jacobsmeier, Matthew L., and DiSarro, Brian. 2012. “Content and Complexity in Policy Reinvention and Diffusion: Gay and Transgender Inclusive Laws against Discrimination.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 12 (1): 75–98..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tribe, Laurence H. 1990. Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack L. 1969. “The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States.” American Political Science Review 63 (3): 880–99..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Christopher, and Federico, Christopher M.. 2013. “Moral Foundations and Heterogeneity in Ideological Preferences.” Political Psychology 34 (1): 107–26..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, 492 U.S. 490 (1989)Google Scholar
Wetstein, Matthew E. 1996. Abortion Rates in the United States: The Influence of Opinion and Policy. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Wetstein, Matthew E., and Albritton, Robert B.. 1995. “Effects of Public Opinion on Abortion Policies and Use in the American States.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 25 (4): 91–105..Google ScholarPubMed
Wilcox, Clyde. 1989. “Political Action Committees and Abortion: A Longitudinal Analysis.” Women & Politics 9:1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, Clyde, and Riches, Julia. 2002. “Pills in the Public's Mind: RU 486 and the Framing of the Abortion Issue.” Women & Politics 24 (3): 61–80..CrossRefGoogle Scholar