Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T09:40:51.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of atmospheric pressure on the survival of photosynthetic microorganisms during simulations of ecopoesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2008

David J. Thomas
Affiliation:
Science Division, Lyon College, 2300 Highland Road, Batesville, AR 72501, USAe-mail: dthomas@lyon.edu
L. Michelle Eubanks
Affiliation:
Science Division, Lyon College, 2300 Highland Road, Batesville, AR 72501, USAe-mail: dthomas@lyon.edu
Carl Rector
Affiliation:
Science Division, Lyon College, 2300 Highland Road, Batesville, AR 72501, USAe-mail: dthomas@lyon.edu
Jaime Warrington
Affiliation:
Science Division, Lyon College, 2300 Highland Road, Batesville, AR 72501, USAe-mail: dthomas@lyon.edu
Paul Todd
Affiliation:
Techshot, Inc., 7200 Highway 150, Greenville, IN 47124, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three cyanobacteria (Anabaena sp., Plectonema boryanum and Chroococcidiopsis CCMEE171) and an alga (Chlorella ellipsoidea) were grown under simulated martian ecopoesis conditions. A xenon arc lamp with a solar filter provided simulated martian sunlight, and temperature cycled diurnally from −80°C to 26°C. A Mars-like atmosphere of 100% CO2 was provided at 50, 100, 300, 500 and 1000 mbar. The cyanobacteria and alga were inoculated into JSC Mars-1 soil simulant and exposed to each atmospheric pressure for five weeks. Survival and growth were determined via extractable chlorophyll a and total esterase (fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis) activity. Maximum survival occurred at 100 and 300 mbar. At 50, 500 and 1000 mbar, esterase activity was near zero, and extractable chlorophyll a was less than 10% of control samples. Overall, the cyanobacteria survived better than the alga. Low survival at 50 mbar was probably due to desiccation. Low survival at 500 and 1000 mbar may have been due to CO2 toxicity.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Techshot's Mars environment simulator (internal view). Samples were contained within the 6 l fused silica (quartz) cylinder, which allowed full-spectrum transmission of light to the samples. Simulated sunlight was reflected onto the samples via a movable, front-surface mirror. The xenon-arc light source was connected at the left-hand side of the simulator (not shown). In this configuration, samples in the middle of the cylinder receive approximately 1000 μmol photons m−2 s−1 PAR, while the samples in the shaded regions receive approximately 15 μmol photons m−2 s−1. Each triplicate sample series had one jar in full light, another in full shade and a third in between the two light extremes. The soil-filled jar at front-centre contained a buried thermistor, which measured soil temperature. Ports on the right end of the cylinder controlled atmospheric pressure and content, and allowed the introduction of water during experiments. The horizontal glass tubes in the bottom of the chamber were used for other experiments not described here.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Environmental conditions within the simulator. This data is from an earlier, 7-day experiment, but it reflects the typical conditions within the sample chamber. In this example, the pressure was held at 100 mbar (~10 kPa).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Differences in sample moisture. By the end of each experiment, samples located toward the ends of the chamber (left) contained more water than samples in the middle of the chamber (right). Sample jars were arranged such that each triplicate series experienced the full range of moisture within the simulator chamber. Differences in moisture content during the experiment were probably responsible for the variation about the means in the life assays (Figs 4 and 5). The moister samples showed more esterase activity and contained more chlorophyll than the drier samples. The culture tube at the bottom of the figure was for another experiment running simultaneously.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Chlorophyll extracts. 1 ml of liquid was removed from each sample, centrifuged and extracted in 80% ethanol in the dark for 24 hours at −20°C. Extracts were measured spectrophotometrically at 664 nm. Controls were combined from all experiments. Error bars equal standard deviations (n=10–15 for controls, n=3 for experimental groups). For all samples, the largest amount of extractable chlorophyll a was found in the 300 mbar experiment.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. FDA hydrolysis assays. 1–2 ml of liquid were removed from each sample and brought to 5 ml with the addition of pH 7.6 phosphate buffer. 10 ml of 5 mg ml−1 FDA solution were added to each sample, followed by incubation for 2–6 hours at 25°C. Samples were extracted in 2:1 chloroform:methanol. The methanol:buffer fractions were measured spectrophotometrically at 490 nm. Controls were combined from all experiments. Error bars equal standard deviations (n=10–15 for controls, n=3 for experimental groups). For the three cyanobacteria, the highest amount of FDA hydrolysis activity was found in the 100 mbar experiment, but the alga, Chlorella ellipsoidea, had more activity in the 300 mbar experiment.