Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T11:13:15.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Middle–Late Triassic evolution of the Jameson Land Basin, East Greenland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2020

Steven D. Andrews*
Affiliation:
University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness, UK CASP, West Building, Madingley Rise, Madingley Road, Cambridge, UK
Andrew Morton
Affiliation:
CASP, West Building, Madingley Rise, Madingley Road, Cambridge, UK HM Research Associates Ltd, Giddanmu, St Ishmaels, UK
Audrey Decou
Affiliation:
University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Steven Andrews, Email: steven.andrews914@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Jameson Land Basin lies within the Greenland–Norway rift, to the south of Triassic basins on the Halten Bank and East Greenland shelf, and can therefore offer insights into the development of these less-well-documented offshore basins and the wider North Atlantic. This study focuses on the stratigraphic development of the Jameson Land Basin. Broad-scale stratigraphic logging is augmented with heavy mineral analysis that constrains the dominant source catchments during this period. A thickness of over 1.5 km of Middle–Late Triassic strata fill the Jameson Land Basin, predominantly comprising continental deposits laid down during arid to semi-arid climatic conditions. The basal Pingo Dal Group thickens westwards into the Stauning Alper Fault, forming a typical syn-rift succession. Thickness variations have also highlighted the presence of an intrabasinal high and an associated unconformity between the Pingo Dal Group and the overlying Gipsdalen Group, which provides the first direct evidence for Middle–Late Triassic rifting in East Greenland. Thickness variations in the overlying Gipsdalen Group are more subdued, and the Fleming Fjord Group, and its formations, display remarkably tabular geometries, with little evidence for significant lateral facies variance; this is suggestive of reduced topography and a more regional thermal subsidence signature. Provenance data indicate sediment sourcing from both the western and eastern basin margins during the deposition of the Pingo Dal Group, above which the western source area becomes dominant, alongside some axial input from the south.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Geological map of the Jameson Land Basin with key localities labelled, and (b) a digital elevation model, indicating the position of examined sections.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Triassic stratigraphy of the Jameson Land Basin modified after Andrews et al. (2014). Gk – Gråklint Member.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. West to east correlation of key examined sections through the Permian–Jurassic succession of the Jameson Land Basin and resulting schematic cross-section. Fk – Foldvik Creek Formation; Wk – Wordie Creek Group; Rø – Rødestaken Formation; Pa – Paradigmabjerg Formation; Kl – Klitdal Formation; Ko – Kolledalen Formation; Gk – Gråklint Member; So – Solfaldsdal Formation; Ka – Kap Seaforth Formation; Ed – Edderfugledal Formation; Ma – Malmros Klint Formation; Ør – Ørsted Dal Formation; Ca – Carlsberg Fjord Member; Bk – Bergkronerne Member; Ks – Kap Stewart Gp.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Pingo Dal Group. (a) Onlap of the Klitdal Formation onto fractured Caledonian granite on the east side of Klitdal at the eastern margin of the basin (unconformity marked by the dashed line). (b) Angular unconformity between the Klidal Formation and the overlying Gipsdalen Group. (c) Typical coarse-grained facies of the Klitdal Formation, Nordenskiöld Bjerg. (d) Stage IV pale-grey calcrete and red silcrete development, Devondal south. (e) Coarse-grained facies of the Paradigmabjerg Formation, Snæveggen. (f) Intercalated sandstones, siltstones and mudstones, including distinctive white sugary gypsum sands, of the upper portion of the Paradigmabjerg Formation in eastern Pingo Dal (c. 27 m section). (g) Large-scale cross-bedding, eastern Pingo Dal (Kolledalen Formation).

Figure 4

Fig. 5. View SW up Devondal from the northern slopes of Nordenskiöld Bjerg. There is a distinct SE–NW thinning of the Pingo Dal Group across the inferred fault trace of the Devondal Fault. No evidence is recognized for activity on this fault during the deposition of the post-Carnian succession.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Gråklint Member. (a) Finely laminated black calcareous bituminous mudstones, characteristic of the Gråklint Member, Nordenskiöld Bjerg. (b) Large-scale cross-bedding (3.5 m) in sandy limestones, the NW ridge of Point 850, Pingel Dal. (c) Sandy limestone breccia facies with black chert nodules, after Magadiite, draped by the overlying black mudstones, Nordenskiöld Bjerg. (d) Cruziana-type traces and branching. (e) Thalassinoides?-type burrows on bed bases from Kap Seaforth.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. (a, b) Solfaldsdal and (c–e) Kap Seaforth formations. (a) Interbedded red mudstones, siltstones and sandstones, typical of the Solfaldsdal Formation corpus, Sporfjeld (thickness of strata c. 50 m). (b) Bioturbation (BI 2) starting to obscure original ripple structures; miniscate fill indicating downwards burrowing can be recognized in a burrow towards the top left (circled). (c) Characteristic variegated appearance of the Kap Seaforth Formation mudstones, siltstones and sandstones, Kap Seaforth (30 m). (d) Thick, stacked, massive gypsum beds in Dværgarvedal. (e) Well-laminated grey mudstones, with this sandstone laminae forming the deepest water portion of a lacustrine cycle in a basin centre position, Sporfjeld.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Edderfugledal Formation. (a) The prominent buff/yellow-coloured cliff forming Edderfugledal Formation, c. 40 m thick, on Buch Bjerg (Kl – Klitdal Formation; So – Solfaldsdal Formation; Ka – Kap Seaforth Formation; Ed – Edderfugledal Formation; Ma – Malmros Klint Formation). (b) Laminated grey mudstones within the Edderfugledal Formation at Malmros Klint. (c) Microbialites from the Sporfjeld Member that form the base of the Edderfugledal Formation, Tait Bjerg, displaying ridge and runnel features. (d) Typical buff-coloured desiccated mudstone facies of the Edderfugledal Formation, Tait Bjerg.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Malmros Klint Formation. (a) Intercalated rippled sandstones and desiccated mudstones indicative of a playa setting, Malmros Klint Formation (Malmros Klint). (b) Massive red mudstone facies of the Malmros Klint Formation (lower Dværgarvedal).

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Ørsted Dal Formation. (a) Coarse grey-buff sandstones that typify the gradational base of the Ørsted Dal Formation (Bergkronerne Member). (b) The more subtle contact between the Malmros Klint Formation and the purple/variegated Carlsberg Fjord Member. (c) Detail of the contact between the Ørsted Dal Formation and the Kap Stewart Group from Kap Biot; locally overturned strata (dashed lines) of the Ørsted Dal Formation overlain by black shales of the Kap Stewart Group. The contact surface is iron stained and littered with coprolites, bone fragments and iron-rich nodules. (d) Cross-bedded coarse sandstones typical of the Bergkronerne Member exposed on the north side of Dværgarvedal. (e) Multi-coloured mudstones of the Carlsberg Fjord Member with thin fine sandstone intercalations forming benches towards the summit of ‘track mountain’. (f) Brecciated limestone facies illustrating brittle brecciation towards the bed top and vertical burrows to the right of the pencil. A mottled texture can also be made out towards the bottom of the bed. (g) Sub-vertical slickensides developed in a massive limestone facies. (h) Rootlets in the brecciated limestone facies.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. W–E correlation of key examined sections, alongside plots of provenance parameters and garnet compositions, through the Triassic succession of the Jameson Land Basin. See Figure 3 for locations of sections. Inset is a schematic cross-section through the Triassic succession of the Jameson Land Basin that summarizes heavy mineral trends, the orange section with a low-RuZi index (< 20) and the green section with a high-RuZi index (> 30). Within the orange section, an east to west transition from garnets indicative of a metasedimentary source to those of eclogitic and granitic sources is recognized. Provenance-sensitive heavy mineral parameters (ATi, GZi, RuZi, MZi) as defined by Morton & Hallsworth (1994). Garnet types A, B and C as defined by Morton et al. (2004) and Mange & Morton (2007).

Supplementary material: File

Andrews et al. supplementary material

Andrews et al. supplementary material

Download Andrews et al. supplementary material(File)
File 60.4 KB