Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T09:37:51.257Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sepiolite as an efficient adsorbent for ethylene gas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2022

Burcu Erdoğan*
Affiliation:
Eskisehir Technical University, Faculty of Science, Department of Physics, 26470, Eskisehir, Turkey
Fahri Esenli
Affiliation:
Istanbul Technical University, Faculty of Mines, Geological Engineering Department, Istanbul, Turkey
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ability of Na+-, Li+-, K+-, Ca2+- and Mg2+-exchanged sepiolites and acid-activated sepiolites to remove ethylene from storage environments was examined. The sepiolite from Sivrihisar deposit, Turkey, was treated with 1.0 M NaNO3, LiNO3, KNO3, Ca(NO3)2, Mg(NO3)2, HNO3 and H2SO4 solutions at 90°C for 4 h. The mineralogical, chemical and textural properties of the materials were examined using X-ray diffraction, X-ray fluorescence, cation-exchange capacity and nitrogen gas adsorption analyses. The main mineral phase present in the materials was sepiolite, with minor dolomite, and traces of quartz and feldspar minerals and amorphous matter. Adsorption isotherms of ethylene at 273 K were measured on sepiolite samples over a pressure range of 0–100 kPa. As a result of partial blockage of the sepiolite channels, the ethylene adsorption capacity on cation-exchanged sepiolite forms (0.376–0.907 mmol g–1) was less than that of acid-activated sepiolite forms (1.279 and 1.308 mmol g–1). The ethylene adsorption capacities of the sepiolite samples were compared with those of other clay-based materials (0.167–1.817 mmol g–1) reported in previous studies of ethylene removal.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Geological map of the southern Sivrihisar area and location of the Yenidoğan sepiolite deposit (revised from MTA, 2002; Yeniyol, 2014).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. XRD traces of the (a) raw S, (b) Mg-S, (c) Li-S, (d) Ca-S, (e) K-S, (F) Na-S, (g) HN-S and (h) HS-S samples. D = dolomite; Sp = sepiolite.

Figure 2

Table 1. Chemical compositions (%) of the natural, cation-exchanged and acid-activated sepiolites.

Figure 3

Table 2. CEC and nitrogen adsorption data of the natural, cation-exchanged and acid-activated sepiolites.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Ethylene adsorption isotherms of the S, Ca-S, Mg-S and HS-S samples at 273 K.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Ethylene adsorption isotherms of the HN-S, K-S, Li-S and Na-S samples at 273 K.

Figure 6

Table 3. Comparison of the ethylene adsorption capacities of the present work with literature data.