Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-kwdml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T14:52:12.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Richardson and Reynolds number effects on the near field of buoyant plumes: temporal variability and puffing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Michael A. Meehan
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Nicholas T. Wimer
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401-3393, USA
Peter E. Hamlington*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: peh@colorado.edu

Abstract

Using numerical simulations, we investigate the near-field temporal variability of axisymmetric helium plumes as a function of inlet-based Richardson (${Ri}_0$) and Reynolds (${Re}_0$) numbers. Previous studies have shown that ${Ri}_0$ plays a leading-order role in determining the frequency at which large-scale vortices are produced (commonly called the ‘puffing’ frequency). By contrast, ${Re}_0$ dictates the strength of localized gradients, which are important during the transition from laminar to turbulent flow. The simulations presented here span a range of ${Ri}_0$ and ${Re}_0$, and use adaptive mesh refinement to achieve high spatial resolutions. We find that as ${Re}_0$ increases for a given ${Ri}_0$, the puffing motion undergoes a transition at a critical ${Re}_0$, marking the onset of chaotic dynamics. Moreover, the critical ${Re}_0$ decreases as ${Ri}_0$ increases. When the puffing instability is non-chaotic, time series of different variables are well-correlated, exhibiting only modest changes in the dynamics (including period doubling and flapping). Once the flow becomes chaotic, denser ambient fluid penetrates the core of the plume, similar to penetrating ‘spikes’ formed by Rayleigh–Taylor instabilities, leading to only moderately correlated flow variables. These changes result in a non-trivial dependence of the puffing frequency on ${Re}_0$. Specifically, at sufficiently low ${Re}_0$, the puffing frequency falls below the prediction from Wimer et al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 895, 2020). As ${Re}_0$ increases beyond the critical ${Re}_0$, the puffing frequency increases and then drops back down to the predicted scaling. The dependence of the puffing frequency on ${Re}_0$ provides a possible explanation for previously observed changes in the scaling of the puffing frequency for high ${Ri}_0$.

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1.Two-dimensional slices through the entire computational domain of the density field for (a) ${Ri}_0=2$, ${Re}_0=316$, and (b) ${Ri}_0=20$, ${Re}_0=316$. Half of the visualization corresponds to the density field $\rho$, and the other half visualizes the grid level $\ell$.

Figure 1

Table 1.List of all independent, dynamically relevant inlet parameters for the buoyant plume simulations. Parameters with numerical values are fixed for all simulations.

Figure 2

Table 2.Non-dimensional numbers formed from the independent, dynamically relevant inlet parameters in table 1. Non-dimensional numbers with numerical values are fixed for all simulations.

Figure 3

Table 3.Parameters of the simulations performed herein, with corresponding definitions given in tables 1 and 2. We also provide the domain side length ($L/R_0$), the amount of data collected for each simulation ($T/\tau ^{*}$), and the time step between snapshots used for statistics ($\tau ^{*}/\Delta t$).

Figure 4

Figure 2.Richardson and Reynolds number values for previously conducted experiments of axisymmetric, unsteady helium jets and plumes, as well as the present simulations. The legend corresponds to the following references: B17 – Bharadwaj & Das (2017); C96 – Cetegen & Kasper (1996); C97 – Cetegen (1997a); H06 – Hallberg & Strykowski (2006); K93 – Kyle & Sreenivasan (1993); O05 – O'Hern et al. (2005); P03 – Pasumarthi & Agrawal (2003); S92 – Subbarao & Cantwell (1992); and Y05 – Yep et al. (2003). The red dashed line shows the approximate onset of the puffing instability as provided by Bharadwaj & Das (2017).

Figure 5

Figure 3.Time series of the density field over a time span of roughly $\tau ^{*}$ for six different cases: (a) ${Ri}_0=2$, ${Re}_0=100$; (b) ${Ri}_0=2$, ${Re}_0=316$; (c) ${Ri}_0=2$, ${Re}_0=1000$; (d) ${Ri}_0=20$, ${Re}_0=100$; (e) ${Ri}_0=20$, ${Re}_0=316$; (f) ${Ri}_0=20$, ${Re}_0=1000$. Time progresses in increments of $\tau ^{*}/4$ from left to right. Panels (a i–f i) show where the AMR grid is refined, with grey indicating $\ell =2$, and black indicating $\ell =3$. Panels (a v–f v) include the in-plane direction of the velocity vector (not scaled with velocity magnitude).

Figure 6

Figure 4.Time series of (a–d) $u_z/U_0$ and (e–h) $Y_{He}$ on the centreline ($r/R_0=0$) at height $z/R_0=0.5$ above the plume. Different line colours and widths correspond to different values of ${Re}_0$. Note that the time has been normalized by the expected time scale $\tau ^{*}$, based on (1.1) rather than the computed puffing frequency presented later in the text. Plots are for: (a,e) ${Ri}_0 = 2$, (b,f) ${Ri}_0 = 6.3$, (c,g) ${Ri}_0 = 20$, and (d,h) ${Ri}_0 = 63$.

Figure 7

Figure 5.Time series of $u_r/U_0$ on the centreline ($r/R_0=0$) at height $z/R_0=0.5$ above the plume for (a) ${Ri}_0=2$ and (b) ${Ri}_0=6.3$. Different line colours and widths correspond to different values of ${Re}_0$.

Figure 8

Figure 6.Same as figure 4, but at location $r=\delta _Y/2$, $z/R_0=0.5$ within the shear layer.

Figure 9

Figure 7.State-space trajectories of the vertical velocity at $r/R_0=0$, $z/R_0=0.5$, generated by plotting the same signal on different axes with an offset by $\tau ^{*}/4$. The lines are coloured by time elapsed during the simulation. Plots are for: (a–e) $Ri_0 = 2$, (f–j) $Ri_0 = 6.3$, (k–o) $Ri_0 = 20$, (p–r) $Ri_0 = 63$; and (a,f,k,p) $Re_0=100$, (b,g,l,q) $Re_0=178$, (c,h,m,r) $Re_0=316$, (d,i,n) $Re_0=562$, (e,j,o) $Re_0=1000$.

Figure 10

Figure 8.State-space trajectories of the vertical velocity for ${Ri}_0=2$, ${Re}_0=1000$ along the centreline at different vertical locations. The lines are coloured the same as in figure 7: (a) $z/R_0=0.25$, (b) $z/R_0=1$, (c) $z/R_0=2$.

Figure 11

Figure 9.State-space trajectories of the vertical velocity $u_z/U_0$ and mechanical pressure $p/\rho _\infty U_0^{2}$ at $r/R_0=0$, $z/R_0=0.5$. The lines are coloured by time elapsed during the simulation. Plots are for: (a) $Ri_0=2$, $Re_0=100$; (b) $Ri_0=6.3$, $Re_0=100$; (c) $Ri_0=20$, $Re_0=100$; (d) $Ri_0=63$, $Re_0=100$; (e) $Ri_0=2$, $Re_0=316$; (f) $Ri_0=6.3$, $Re_0=316$; (g) $Ri_0=20$, $Re_0=316$; (h) $Ri_0=63$, $Re_0=316$; (i) $Ri_0=2$, $Re_0=1000$; (j) $Ri_0=6.3$, $Re_0=1000$; (k) $Ri_0=20$, $Re_0=1000$.

Figure 12

Figure 10.Correlations between $Y_{He}$ and $u_r$ (green circles), $Y_{He}$ and $p$ (blue squares), and $u_r$ and $p$ (red triangles), at $r=\delta _Y/2$, $z/R_0=0.5$ within the shear layer for several of the simulations. Plots are for: (a) $Ri_0=2$, $Re_0=100$; (b) $Ri_0=6.3$, $Re_0=100$; (c) $Ri_0=20$, $Re_0=100$; (d) $Ri_0=63$, $Re_0=100$; (e) $Ri_0=2$, $Re_0=316$; (f) $Ri_0=6.3$, $Re_0=316$; (g) $Ri_0=20$, $Re_0=316$; (h) $Ri_0=63$, $Re_0=316$; (i) $Ri_0=2$, $Re_0=1000$; (j) $Ri_0=6.3$, $Re_0=1000$; (k) $Ri_0=20$, $Re_0=1000$.

Figure 13

Figure 11.Normalized power spectral densities (PSDs) of $u_z$ along the centreline at $z/R_0 = 0.5$ for (a–c) ${Ri}_0=2$ and (d–f) ${Ri}_0=20$, at (a,d) ${Re}_0=100$, (b,e) ${Re}_0=316$, and (c,f) ${Re}_0=1000$. The observed Strouhal number ${St}_0$ is normalized by the predicted value ${St}^{*}_0$ obtained from (1.1).

Figure 14

Figure 12.Frequency corresponding to the peak in the PSD of the fluctuating streamwise velocity computed at each spatial location within a radial slice for all simulations performed in this study. Images are coloured using $\log _2({St}_0/{St}_0^{*})$ such that 0 (or white) corresponds to the computed ${St}_0$ being identical to ${St}_0^{*}$ from (1.1), with integer values corresponding to harmonics. Plots are for (a–e) $Ri_0 = 2$, (f–j) $Ri_0 = 6.3$, (k–o) $Ri_0 = 20$, (p,q,r) $Ri_0 = 63$, with (a,f,k,p) $Re_0=100$, (b,g,l,q) $Re_0=178$, (c,h,m,r) $Re_0=316$, (d,i,n) $Re_0=562$, (e,j,o) $Re_0=1000$.

Figure 15

Figure 13.Puffing frequency measured by the most commonly computed ${St}_0$ value in each simulation. Symbols correspond to different ${Ri}_0$, and colours correspond to different ${Re}_0$. (a) Puffing frequency as a function of ${Ri}_0$. (b) Puffing frequency as a function of ${Re}_0$. The dashed lines are the empirical correlation predicted by Wimer et al. (2020) and indicated in (1.1).

Figure 16

Table 4.Characterization of the flow dynamics in the near field of buoyant plumes in terms of the Richardson and Reynolds numbers.

Figure 17

Table 5.Parameters of the simulations used to assess convergence of the computational grid. The simulations with $\ell _{max}=2$, $|\Delta \rho | > 0.19$ and $|\omega _i|\times 2^{\ell } > 150$ are identical to those in table 3. We use $\varphi$ as the threshold value for the density variations $|\Delta \rho |$ and level-varying vorticity magnitude $|\omega _i|\times 2^{\ell }$. Physical parameter values are identical to those in table 3. We also provide the average percentage, $\bar {p}_\ell$, of the region $x\in [-1.5R_0,1.5R_0]$, $y\in [-1.5R_0,1.5R_0]$ and $z\in [0,5R_0]$ that is resolved by a particular grid level $\ell$.

Figure 18

Figure 14.P.d.f.s of $p_\ell$ for the region $x\in [-1.5R_0,1.5R_0]$, $y\in [-1.5R_0,1.5R_0]$ and $z\in [0,5R_0]$ that is resolved by a particular grid level $\ell$. In each case, ${Ri}_0=20.0$. Plots are for: (a) $Re_0= 100$, $l_{max}=1$; (b) $Re_0= 316$, $l_{max}=1$; (c) $Re_0= 1000$, $l_{max}=1$; (d) $Re_0= 100$, $l_{max}=2$; (e) $Re_0= 316$, $l_{max}=2$; (f) $Re_0= 1000$, $l_{max}=2$; (g) $Re_0= 100$, $l_{max}=3$; (h) $Re_0= 316$, $l_{max}=3$; (i) $Re_0= 1000$, $l_{max}=3$; (j) $Re_0= 100$, $l_{max}=4$; (k) $Re_0= 316$, $l_{max}=4$; (l) $Re_0= 1000$, $l_{max}=4$.

Figure 19

Figure 15.(a–c) Mass flux $\overline {\mathcal {M}}$, and (d–f) density-weighted kinetic energy $\overline {\mathcal {D}}$, for various maximum levels of AMR of (a,d) ${Ri}_0=20$, ${Re}_0=100$, (b,e) ${Ri}_0=20$, ${Re}_0=316$, and (c,f) ${Ri}_0=20$, ${Re}_0=1000$.

Figure 20

Figure 16.(a–c) Centreline density discrepancy $1-\bar {\rho }_c/\rho _\infty$, (d–f) centreline velocity $\bar {u}_c/U_0$, (g–i) the flow width using helium mass fraction $\delta _Y$, and (j–l) the flow width using streamwise velocity $\delta _u$, for various maximum levels of AMR of (a,d,g,j) ${Ri}_0=20$, ${Re}_0=100$, (b,e,h,k) ${Ri}_0=20$, ${Re}_0=316$, and (c,f,i,l) ${Ri}_0=20$, ${Re}_0=1000$.

Figure 21

Figure 17.Spatial distribution of turbulent kinetic energy for (a–d) ${Re}_0=100$, (e–h) ${Re}_0=316$, and (i–l) ${Re}_0=1000$, for simulations with (a,e,i) $\ell _{max}=1$, (b,f,j) $\ell _{max}=2$, (c,g,k) $\ell _{max}=3$, and (d,h,l) $\ell _{max}=4$. Each case has ${Ri}_0=20$.

Figure 22

Figure 18.Temporal spectra of the turbulent kinetic energy as a function of frequency $f$, normalized by $\tau ^{*}$ computed from (1.1). The spectra are computed at $z/R_0=0.5$ along the centreline. The dashed line corresponds to slope $-5/2$. Plots are for (a) $Re_0=100$, (b) $Re_0=316$, and (c) $Re_0=1000$.

Figure 23

Figure 19.Logarithm of the p.d.f.s of vorticity components taken at $r/R_0=0.75$, $z/R_0=0.5$. Line colours correspond to those in figure 18. Plots are for (a) $Re_0=100$, (b) $Re_0=316$, (c) $Re_0=1000$, (d) $Re_0=100$, (e) $Re_0=316$, (f) $Re_0=1000$, (g) $Re_0=100$, (h) $Re_0=316$, (i) $Re_0=1000$.

Figure 24

Figure 20.Instantaneous snapshots of the density field for the most laminar simulation (${Ri}_0=2$, ${Re}_0=100$) for two different AMR refinement criteria. The grids are overlaid on the density field with regions surrounded by black lines corresponding to $\ell =3$, and regions surrounded by grey lines corresponding to $\ell =2$. (a) Simulation using the same criteria as in § 3. (b) Overly-resolved simulation using criteria given in table 5.

Figure 25

Figure 21.Centreline plots of (a) $\bar {u}_z/U_0$ and (b) $\overline {u_i' u_i'}/2U_0^{2}$ for the ${Ri}_0=2$, ${Re}_0=100$ laminar plume with two different AMR criteria.