Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T14:32:25.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surrounding dose investigation of real-time motion tracking system in tomotherapy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2025

Phairot Kititharakun
Affiliation:
Medical physics program, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
Wannapha Nobnop
Affiliation:
Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
Anupong Kongsa
Affiliation:
Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
Warit Thongsuk
Affiliation:
Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
Anirut Watcharawipha*
Affiliation:
Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
*
Corresponding author: Anirut Watcharawipha; Email: anirut.watch@cmu.ac.th
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Purpose:

This study investigated the dose difference (DD) in the surrounding dose area using the real-time motion tracking (RTMT) system in tomotherapy.

Method:

Seven stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy treatment plans with a single lesion were used for the investigations. Each treatment plan was evaluated for the Gamma passing rate (GPR) analysis in a static target motion using the ArcCHECK® phantom. Subsequently, each plan was matched with 8 clinical respiratory cycles to simulate moving target motion. The DD was calculated through point-to-point comparison and expressed as the frequency of the DD levels. The DD frequency was analysed for significant correlations with the target travelling distance, target size and respiratory frequency.

Result:

The GPR for criteria of 3%/2mm and 3%/3mm revealed values of 97·8 ± 1·9% and 99·5 ± 0·6%, respectively, for static motion. The highest frequency of DD was in the 5 – 10% range. A significant correlation was found between the target travelling distance and the frequency of percent DD at the 2·0 – 3·0% and 10·0 – 15·0% levels, as well as between target size and the frequency of percent DD at the 0·0 – 4·0% and 10·0 – 25·0% levels. Finally, no significant correlation was found between the frequency of percent DD and respiratory frequency.

Conclusion:

RTMT introduced the DD in the surrounding treatment area. The DD was found to be up to 15·0% at 119·5 mm (water-equivalent distance) from the phantom centre. The DD was varied depending on the target travelling distance and size, but it did not depend on the respiratory frequency.

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Position of ionization chamber 0·13 cc.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Examples of selected clinical respiratory cycle in the experiment where (a) is the respiratory cycle number 1 and (b) is number 3.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Measurement setup geometry. (a) Static target motion setup and (b) Moving target motion setup.

Figure 3

Table 1. Gamma passing rate value for static and moving target motion

Figure 4

Figure 4. Point-to-point dose comparison where (a) Measured dose point and (b) Calculated dose point. Number of yellow highlight is the dose at the detector position.

Figure 5

Table 2. Frequency of different levels of percent dose difference at point-to-point between static and moving target motion

Figure 6

Figure 5. Frequency of percent dose difference separated by percent dose difference levels.

Figure 7

Figure 6. Plots and trend line between the frequency of percent dose difference levels and target characteristics where bold lines are a significant correlation and dash lines are no significant correlation. (a) Target travelling distance correlation, (b) PTV size correlation and (c) Respiratory frequency.

Figure 8

Table 3. Frequency of different levels of percent dose difference at point-to-point between static and moving target motion

Figure 9

Figure 7. Examples of two-dimensional dose distribution from ArcCHECK® where (a) Dose distribution of treatment planning number 1 and (b) Dose distribution of treatment planning number 2. Colour dots are the positions that had a dose difference at levels of 0 – 5% (red dots), 5 – 15% (blue dots) and more than 15% (green dots).

Figure 10

Figure 8. Diagrams of target characteristics impact the frequency of percent dose difference. Upper row demonstrates the area of detector that has a short target travelling distance (a) and a long target travelling distance (b). Bottom row illustrates the area of detector that has a small PTV size (c) and a large PTV size (d).