Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T23:03:26.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetic characterization of oleaginous bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria) germplasm from Côte d'Ivoire using agromorphological and molecular markers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2022

Ahou Anique Gbotto*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Génétique, UFR Agroforesterie, Université Jean Lorougnon Guédé, B.P. 150 Daloa, Côte d'Ivoire
Nasser Kouadio Yao
Affiliation:
Biosciences Eastern and Central Africa – International Livestock Research Institute (BecA-ILRI) Hub, P.O. Box 30709-00200, Nairobi, Kenya
Mercy Kitavi
Affiliation:
International Potato Center (CIP) – Sub Saharan Africa Old Naivasha Road – International Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 25171-00603, Nairobi, Kenya
Sarah Karen Osama
Affiliation:
Queensland Alliance for Agriculture Food and Innovation, University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, Australia
Richard Habimana
Affiliation:
College of Agriculture, Animal Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Rwanda, P.O. Box 57 Nyagatare, Rwanda
Kouamé Kevin Koffi
Affiliation:
Unité de recherche Phytotechnie et Amélioration Génétique, UFR des Sciences de la Nature, Université Nangui Abrogoua, 02 B.P. 801 Abidjan 01, Côte d'Ivoire
Irié Arsène Zoro Bi
Affiliation:
Unité de recherche Phytotechnie et Amélioration Génétique, UFR des Sciences de la Nature, Université Nangui Abrogoua, 02 B.P. 801 Abidjan 01, Côte d'Ivoire
*
Author for correspondence: Ahou Anique Gbotto, E-mail: aniquegbotto@yahoo.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Being difficult to regenerate and maintain the seeds, the oleaginous bottle gourd was investigated using nine agromorphological traits and 31 amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers. Specifically, the study was conducted to determine the intra-specific variability of a total of 173 accessions, which were identified from five agro-ecological regions from Côte d'Ivoire (Centre, East, North and South). Then, the genetic diversity and relationships within accessions were studied using AFLP markers. This characterization using both morphological and AFLP markers was realized in order to ultimately build a reliable core collection. The discriminant analysis, using nine quantitative traits, reveals plant length and seeds number per fruit as discriminating characteristics. From the accessions used for the agromorphological study, 148 were able to be differentiated by the AFLP markers. A range of 52 to 113 bands were amplified per primer combination. As revealed by the analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA), 28% of the total variation resides among accessions and 72% occurs within populations. The AMOVA computed in order to differentiate cultivars, displayed the same trends when no prior grouping of accessions was considered. The differentiation within cultivar (97%) was more than that, among cultivars (3%). Tree topologies inferred by neighbour-joining analysis reflected no clear cut off grouping.

To group accessions, we used a Bayesian clustering analysis which exhibited two clusters. Using the informativeness of the primer combinations analysed in the present study, an orientation was given for the choice of the accessions which would be used to build a core collection.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of NIAB
Figure 0

Table 1. Total number of amplified and polymorphic fragments with 31 amplified fragments length polymorphism primer combinations

Figure 1

Table 2. Eigenvectors, eigenvalues and inertia percentage explained by the two first canonical variables for five traits analysed in 173 accessions of the oleaginous Lagenaria siceraria

Figure 2

Fig. 1. Dendrogram of 173 accessions constructed using an UPGMA group analysis method based on Euclidian distance from agromorphological data GI, group I; GII, group II; GIII, group III; GIV, group IV.

Figure 3

Table 3. Partitioning of genetic variation using AMOVA on AFLP data considering (a) no prior grouping of populations; (b) no prior grouping of cultivars

Figure 4

Fig. 2. NJ tree of 148 Lagenaria siceraria accessions using AFLPs data. Numbers shown at different nodes represent percentage confidence limits obtained by the bootstrap analysis G I, group I; G II, group II; SG I-I, subgroup I from group I; SG I-II, subgroup II from group I; SG I-III, subgroup III from group I; SG I-VI, subgroup IV from group I; SG II-I, subgroup I from group II; SG II-II, subgroup II from group II.

Figure 5

Fig. 3. STRUCTURE analysis of Lagenaria siceraria populations Bar plot showing clustering of individuals by Structure with K = 2. Each colour represents one cluster, each population is represented by a vertical bar, each individual is represented by a single vertical line broken into K coloured segments, with lengths proportional to each of the K inferred clusters.

Supplementary material: File

Gbotto et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S4

Download Gbotto et al. supplementary material(File)
File 52 KB