Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T20:32:05.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A novel approach to non-invasive blood glucose sensing based on a single-slot defected ground structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2022

Esraa Mansour*
Affiliation:
Electronics and Communications Engineering Department, Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology, Alexandria, Egypt Electronics and Communications Engineering Department, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
Ahmed Allam
Affiliation:
Electronics and Communications Engineering Department, Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology, Alexandria, Egypt
Adel B. Abdel-Rahman
Affiliation:
Electronics and Communications Engineering Department, Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology, Alexandria, Egypt
*
Author for correspondence: Esraa Mansour, E-mail: esraa.mansour@ejust.edu.eg
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this study, we explore a novel approach to measure blood glucose concentration in a non-invasive way using a compact defected ground structure (DGS) filter. The proposed sensor is promising because it is cost-effective, compact, non-ionizing in nature, and convenient for diabetics. Therefore, a portable microwave biosensor can be utilized using these features. In this study, we present a single DGS sensor which is designed on a Rogers RO4003C substrate and fed by a 50 Ω microstrip line, and operating in the industrial, scientific, and medical radio bands (2.4–2.5 GHz). The changes in dielectric properties in blood are mainly relying on glucose concentrations. The main concept of using a sensor is by placing a finger on the sensing area (the slot). The filter is demonstrated by simulations using CST Microwave Studio. Additionally, the blood layer with different glucose concentrations from 250 to 16 000 mg/dl is presented by the Cole–Cole model. The sensor can achieve a relatively good sensitivity of 7.8285 kHz/mg/dl. The size of the fabricated sensor is 40 × 40 × 0.883 mm3, which is suitable for hand-held use.

Information

Type
EuCAP 2021 Special Issue
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Measured (a) dielectric constant and (b) conductivity from 500 MHz to 20 GHz for various glucose levels [18].

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Equivalent circuit of the DGS.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Illustration of the general concept of the non-invasive DGS sensor.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Schematic diagram and dimensions for the DGS sensors used in the simulation.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Single (a) and double (b) slot design for the DGS layer.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. DGS sensor prototype: (a) top view of the fabricated prototype, which shows the ground plane with the slot, and (b) microstrip feed-line, used to excite the DGS, shown in the bottom view.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Experimental versus simulated results of the sensor without a blood sample obtained using the single-slot structure.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Reflection coefficients for different diameters of the sensor (unloaded).

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Reflection coefficients for different diameters of the loaded sensor with a glucose concentration of 250 mg/dl.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Transmission coefficient simulation results of the single-slot DGS sensor with D of 20 mm for different glucose concentrations.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Reflection coefficient simulation results of the single-slot DGS sensor with D of 20 mm for different glucose concentrations.

Figure 11

Table 1. Comparison of this study with another resonator

Figure 12

Fig. 12. Reflection responses of two glucose samples with and without a skin layer.

Figure 13

Fig. 13. Reflection coefficient plot of the proposed two-slot DGS sensor for different glucose concentrations.

Figure 14

Fig. 14. Experimental measurements for two different blood glucose concentrations compared to a case without a blood sample.

Figure 15

Fig. 15. AD8302 gain/phase detector evaluation board.

Figure 16

Fig. 16. Sensor amplitude difference as a function of different glucose concentrations.

Figure 17

Fig. 17. Amplitude readings as a function of different glucose concentrations over different frequencies.