Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T05:47:26.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radiographic appearance of extracorporeal membrane oxygenations versus left ventricular assist device

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2021

Phillip M Mackie
Affiliation:
Congenital Heart Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
Giles J Peek
Affiliation:
Congenital Heart Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
Jeffrey P Jacobs
Affiliation:
Congenital Heart Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
Mark S Bleiweis*
Affiliation:
Congenital Heart Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Mark S. Bleiweis, Congenital Heart Center, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA. E-mail: bleiweis@ufl.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chest radiography compares left ventricular decompression in the same patient supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with atrial septal fenestration and subsequently supported with left ventricular assist device with apical cannulation.

Information

Type
Images in Congenital Cardiac Disease
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. An anterior–posterior chest radiograph of a 5-year-old girl with an atrial stent on femoral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Figure 1

Figure 2. An anterior–posterior chest radiograph of the same patient status post-direct cannulation of the left ventricle with a Berlin left ventricular assist device.