Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T02:50:04.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“The assumption of separate senses”: Pervasive? Perhaps –Persuasive? Hardly!

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2001

Beatrix Vereijken
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 7034, Norway beatrix.vereijken@svt.ntnu.no www.svt.ntnu.no/psy/eatrix.Vereijken
H.T. A (John) Whiting
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of York, Heslington, York, United Kingdom htaw1@york.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We show that Stoffregen & Bardy's arguments against theassumption of separately functioning senses have more historicalantecedents than they give credit for, and that multimodalfunctioning – primitive in perceptual and brain development – doesnot require this assumption. What is needed is evidence thatbiological organisms are indeed detecting and acting uponinformation in a multimodal (or global) array.

Information

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press