Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T02:36:16.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparative study on the evolution of microstructure and hardness during monotonic and cyclic high pressure torsion of CoCuFeMnNi high entropy alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2019

Reshma Sonkusare
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 208016, India
Nimish Khandelwal
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 208016, India; and Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur, Jaipur 302017, India
Pradipta Ghosh
Affiliation:
Erich Schmid Institute of Materials Science, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Leoben 8700, Austria
Krishanu Biswas
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 208016, India
Nilesh Prakash Gurao*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 208016, India
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: npgurao@iitk.ac.in

Abstract

Discs of CoCuFeMnNi face centered cubic high entropy alloy were subjected to monotonic and cyclic high pressure torsion (HPT) in a single step and multiple steps of 5° forward and reverse cycle for 100° and 360° twist, respectively, under 5 GPa pressure at room temperature. It was observed that the 100° cyclic HPT sample shows the highest hardness at the periphery comparable to 360° monotonic HPT sample, while the cyclic 360° HPT sample shows the lowest hardness throughout the sample. High hardness of 100° cyclic HPT sample can be attributed to finer grain size and unstable dislocation substructure by continuous change in strain path from initial compression to forward–reverse torsion, while stable dislocation structure corresponding to shear contributes to increase in hardness from 100° to 360° for monotonic HPT sample. The unstable dislocation substructure promotes grain boundary migration–enabled grain growth leading to low hardness throughout the 360° cyclic HPT sample.

Information

Type
Invited Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 
Figure 0

Figure 1: (a) X-ray diffraction pattern and (b) inverse pole figure map of homogenized sample of CoCuFeMnNi HEA.

Figure 1

Figure 2: X-ray diffraction patterns of monotonic and cyclic HPT deformed samples.

Figure 2

Figure 3: (a) Evolution of hardness in HPT disc as a function of distance from the center. (b) 2D Contour plot for hardness of HPT samples processed by different routes.

Figure 3

Figure 4: Inverse pole figures map of (a) monotonic 100°, (b) cyclic 100°, (c) monotonic 360°, and (d) cyclic 360° HPT samples and (e) KAM plot for all the HPT processed samples.

Figure 4

TABLE I: Intragranular misorientation in terms of KAM and GAM along with GND density for CoCuFeMnNi HEA from EBSD data.

Figure 5

Figure 5: Bright-field TEM images with selected area diffraction pattern of (a) monotonic 100°, (b) cyclic 100°, (c) monotonic 360°, and (d) cyclic 360° HPT samples. Bright field (BF) and dark field (DF) images of same area of (e) monotonic 360° and (f) cyclic 360° HPT sample for grain size determination.

Figure 6

Figure 6: Evolution of effective plastic strain in (a) monotonic 360° and (b) cyclic 360° HPT samples using FEM simulations in SIMUFACT software.

Figure 7

Figure 7: Schematic showing (a) change in aspect ratio of grains during monotonic and cyclic HPT and (b) microstructural evolution during monotonic and cyclic HPT. LAGB: low angle grain boundaries, and HAGB: high angle grain boundaries.

Figure 8

Figure 8: GROD map of (a) monotonic 100°, (b) cyclic 100°, (c) monotonic 360°, and (d) cyclic 360° HPT samples obtained from EBSD.

Figure 9

Figure 9: Schematic of (a) monotonic and (b) cyclic HPT.