Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T12:20:39.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Changes in sleep performance and chronotype behaviour after vestibular rehabilitation in unilateral vestibular hypofunction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2022

A Micarelli*
Affiliation:
Unit of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation and Sensory Organs, Uniter Onlus, Rome, Italy
A Viziano
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, ENT Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy
M Arena
Affiliation:
Unit of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation and Sensory Organs, Uniter Onlus, Rome, Italy
I Misici
Affiliation:
Unit of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation and Sensory Organs, Uniter Onlus, Rome, Italy
A Di Benedetto
Affiliation:
Unit of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation and Sensory Organs, Uniter Onlus, Rome, Italy Occupational Therapy Unit, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
V Carbini
Affiliation:
Unit of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation and Sensory Organs, Uniter Onlus, Rome, Italy
B Micarelli
Affiliation:
Unit of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation and Sensory Organs, Uniter Onlus, Rome, Italy
M Alessandrini
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, ENT Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy
*
Author for correspondence: Dr A Micarelli, Unit of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation and Sensory Organs, Uniter Onlus, Piazza dell’ Emporio 11/A, Rome 00153, Italy E-mail: alessandromicarelli@uniteronlus.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to investigate changes in sleep parameters and self-perceived sleep quality in unilateral vestibular hypofunction participants after vestibular rehabilitation.

Method

Forty-six unilateral vestibular hypofunction participants (before and after vestibular rehabilitation) along with a control group of 60 healthy patients underwent otoneurological examination, a one-week actigraphy sleep analysis and a series of self-report and performance measures.

Results

After vestibular rehabilitation, unilateral vestibular hypofunction participants showed a significant score decrease in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, a self-rated reliable questionnaire depicting sleep quality during the last month, as well as a reduction in sleep onset latency and an increase in total sleep time, indicating an objective improvement in sleep quality as measured by actigraphy analysis. However, after vestibular rehabilitation, unilateral vestibular hypofunction participants still showed statistically significant differences with respect to the control group in both self-rated and objective measurements of sleep quality.

Conclusion

Vestibular rehabilitation may impact on sleep performance and chronotype behaviour, possibly by opposing long-term structural changes along neural pathways entangled in sleep activity because of the deafferentation of the vestibular nuclei.

Information

Type
Main Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Diagram depicting enrolment, treatment and follow-up stages of the protocol. UVH = unilateral vestibular hypofunction; vHIT = video-head impulse test; VOR = vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Figure 1

Table 1. Socio-demographic and aetiological aspects of unilateral vestibular hypofunction and control group participants

Figure 2

Table 2. Within-patient and between-group effects of otoneurological, self-report and performance measures in unilateral vestibular hypofunction for pre- and post-vestibular rehabilitation and control group participants

Figure 3

Table 3. Within-patient and between-group effects of actigraphy-based analysis, sleep quality and chronotype scores in unilateral vestibular hypofunction for pre- and post-vestibular rehabilitation and control group participants

Figure 4

Fig. 2. Box and whisker plot of differences in (a) Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), (b) sleep onset latency (SOL) and (c) total sleep time (TST) between unilateral vestibular hypofunction (UVH) before and after vestibular rehabilitation (pre-VR and post-VR, respectively) and control group (CG) participants. Brackets with asterisk indicate significant post-hoc comparisons. Values are reported as mean ± standard deviation.

Figure 5

Fig. 3. Differences in sleep quality and chronotype behaviour in unilateral vestibular hypofunction (UVH) before and after vestibular rehabilitation (pre-VR and post-VR, respectively) and in the control group (CG) with participants put into subgroups according to (a) Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and (b) reduced Morningness–Eveningness Questionnaire.

Figure 6

Fig. 4. (a) Significant positive correlation found in unilateral vestibular hypofunction (UVH) in difference between pre- and post-vestibular rehabilitation (VR) protocol for change in total sleep time (TST) and change in vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain. (b) Significant negative correlation found in UVH in difference between pre- and post-VR protocol for change in sleep onset latency (SOL) and change in VOR gain. (c) Significant positive correlation found in UVH in difference between pre- and post-VR protocol for change in area in eyes closed (CE) condition and change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores. (d) Significant negative correlation found in UVH in difference between pre- and post-VR protocol for change in total Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and change in reduced Morningness–Eveningness Questionnaire (rMEQ).