Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T10:41:48.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ice-blister observations on glaciers, sea ice and rivers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Austin Kovacs
Austin Kovacs*
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755-1290, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Information

Type
Correspondence
Information
Journal of Glaciology , Volume 38 , Issue 129 , 1992, pp. 314 - 316
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1992

The Editor

Journal of Glaciology

Sir

The paper “Surficial glaciology of Jakobshavns Isbrae, West Greenland: Part I. Surface morphology”, by K. Echelmeyer and others appeared in the © International Glaciological Society, Vol. 31, No. 127. In this paper, the authors made reference to ice-blister formations which they believed had not previously been reported in the literature. These ice features were estimated to be 3–8 m high and 7–20 m long. Two types of blister were noted, hollow and solid. All were found in the ablation zone where summer surface melt forms pools in glacial depressions and crevasses or surface streams.

I saw similar ice blisters on Koettlitz Glacier Ice Tongue, Antarctica, in 1977. During the ablation season, significant surface melting occurs on this ice tongue. In some years, the melting is so severe that “rivers” of rapidly flowing water develop and erode deep channels in the ice surface (Fig. 1). The steep ice walls of the channels were up to 6 m above the water in the areas of study. A truly unique aspect of this flow is that it ran along the spine of the ice tongue back toward the area where the glacier ice becomes free-floating rather than toward the front of the ice tongue and into McMurdo Sound. The ice blisters observed were either cone-shaped (Fig. 2) or sinuous mounds. All were of the solid type in that they were not filled with water or air. The ice blisters appeared to occur where deep depressions had formed in the river and stream channels or in deep melt pools. Since the new ice was “transparent”, one could see through it and in places observe fine sand grains and small pebbles. This material marked the boundary between the new ice and the glacier ice. Some of this granular material can be seen on the river bed in Figure. 1

Fig. 1.

River of meltwater on Koettlitz Glacier Ice Tongue. The dark blotches in the river are granular material resting on the ice bottom. A small 1 m high tracked vehicle is at the tip of the arrow. Dark bands in channel wall are related to ice-fabric variations.

Fig. 2.

Conical (by person) and low-elevation linear (foreground) ice blisters in a refrozen “river” on Koettlitz Glacier Ice Tongue.

Two ice blisters can be seen in Figure. 2 The prominent one, beside the person, was 3 m high and conical in form. The second was½ m high. The apex of this feature ran along the crack in the foreground and under the feet of the photographer. The conical ice blister is seen to be highly fractured. There were six major wedges or pie-shaped pieces, which in turn were also laced with a number of surface fractures. Beside the person in Figure 2 is a block of ice about 1 m thick that had popped off the tip of one wedge when it was deflected upward.

Another observation of the ice blisters in Antarctica was made by Reference Van AutenboerVan Autenboer (1962). He described three ice mounds, up to 2 m high and 15 m in diameter, located near the terminus of Gunnestadbreen. His figure 2 (p. 351) shows a feature that is very similar to the one shown in Figure 2 of this letter.

The conical ice blister shown in Figure 2 bears a resemblance to the sketch presented by Reference Wright and PriestleyWright and Priestley (1922, p. 343). They stated that “On several occasions peculiar structures were observed in sea ice which resembled in appearance nothing so much as the skin of a blister, which had broken...”. Their explanation for sea-ice blister formation was a sudden discharge of gas from beneath the sea-ice sheet. This explanation certainly does not apply to the solid ice blisters observed on Koettlitz Glacier Ice Tongue nor on the Jakobshavns Isbrae ice field.

The solid ice blisters probably grew following the general theory described by Reference SumginSumgin (1941), Reference Liverovskiy and MorozovLiverovskii and Morozov (1941), Reference LewisLewis (1962) and other early investigators as applying to frost mounds in general and river-ice blisters, ice domes and mounds in particular. Once the run-off season ended and the shallower surface waters froze to the glacial ice, water in the deeper pools became fully confined by ice. With time, the expansive forces in the water, associated with continued freezing, either gradually, intermittently or in sudden rapid events, forced the ice cover upward. During this process, the ice blister cracked at its apex and secondary ones formed until all the water in the blister had frozen and expansive uplift stopped. No icings were observed beside the Koettlitz Glacier ice blisters, therefore none of the confined water had escaped during their uplift and fracturing. The hollow ice blisters observed on the Jakobshavns Isbrae ice field by Reference Echelmeyer, Clarke and HarrisonEchelmeyer and others (1991) had apparently drained.

As mentioned above, ice blisters (mounds) also occur on rivers where the bed is impervious, such as in permafrost areas (Fig. 3). Many Russian and North American papers can be found describing such features (Reference LeffingwellLeffingwell, 1919; Reference Smith and MertieSmith and Mertie, 1930; Reference MullerMuller, 1947; Reference CareyCarey, 1970, Reference Carey1973; Reference Chacho, Collins, Delaney, Arcone, Prowse and OmmanneyChacho and others, 1990; Reference CroryCrory, 1991). On the North Slope of Alaska these numerous and conspicuous features are easily seen from the ground or an aircraft.

Fig. 3.

A small conical (upper right) and several sinuous ice blisters observed in the Katakturuk River delta, Camden Bay, Beaufort Sea coast, Alaska, in 1980.

Between 1978 and 1984, I made helicopter reconnaissance flights along the Chukchi and Beaufort Sea coasts of Alaska each spring. During these years, conical or long sinuous ice blisters were seen on most of the rivers entering the sea. No river on the Alaska North Slope flows during the winter but massive spring-fed icings do occur, and some remain after the summer melt season. A number of the ice blisters were drilled at their apexes. Many blisters were found to contain a core of water (Fig. 4). The water would rise in the 5 cm diameter borehole but only at one location did a very small quantity of the water flow out at the top of the blister. The confined water pressure is not known but it probably was much lower than the several tens of atmospheres determined by Reference PetrovPetrov (1930) for confined ground water below seasonal frost in areas of spring-fed icings. Pressure on the order of 25–100 kPa seems more realistic based on measurements of the water pressure in frost mounds by Reference Pollard and FrenchPollard and French (1984). The drillhole-flow observations indicated that the blisters were not spring-fed and that the ice uplift is analogous to cream being forced upward from a freezing bottle of milk, or to the crown on the top or bottom of a frozen bucket of water.

Fig. 4.

Representative cross-section of a sinuous ice blister studied in the Katakturuk River delta, Alaska. The in situ salinity of the ice-blister water was 0.6‰.

References

Carey, K. L. 1970. Icing occurrence, control and prevention: an annotated bibliography. CRREL Spec. Rep. 151. Google Scholar
Carey, K. L. 1973. Icings developed from surface water and ground water. CRREL Monogr. III–D 3.Google Scholar
Chacho, Ε. F., Jr, Collins, C. M. Delaney, A. J. and Arcone, S. A. 1990. River icing mounds: a winter water source on the eastern North Slope of Alaska. In Prowse, T. D. and Ommanney, C. S. L. eds. Northern hydrology: selected perspectives. Proceedings of the Northern Hydrology Symposium, 10–12 July 1990, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. Saskatoon, National Hydrology Research Institute, 33–45.Google Scholar
Crory, F. E. 1991. Construction guidelines for oil and gas exploration in northern Alaska. CRREL Rep. 91–21.Google Scholar
Echelmeyer, Κ., Clarke, T. S. and Harrison, W. D. 1991. Surficial glaciology of Jakobshavns Isbrae, West Green-land: Part I. Surface morphology. J. Glaciol., 37(127), 368–382.Google Scholar
Leffingwell, E. DeK. 1919. The Canning River region, northern Alaska. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 109.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. R. 1962. Icing mound on Sadlerochit River, Alaska. Arctic, 15(2), 145–150.Google Scholar
Liverovskiy, Α. V. and Morozov, K. D. 1941. Construction on permafrost. [Translation from Russian.] Hanover, NH, Army Corps of Engineers Frost Effects Laboratory. (Report ACFEL TL-21.)Google Scholar
Muller, S. W. 1947. Permafrost or permanently frozen ground, and related engineering problems. Ann Arbor, MI, Edwards J. W.Google Scholar
Petrov, V. G. 1930. Naledi na Amursko i Akutskoi magistrali [The naleds of the Amur–Yakutsk highway]. Leningrad, Izdanie Akademii Nauk SSSR i Nauchno-Issledova-tel’skogo Avtormobil’no. Dorozhnogo Instituta.Google Scholar
Pollard, W. H. and French, H. W. 1984. The groundwater hydraulics of a seasonal frost mound, North York Pass, Yukon Territory. Can. J. Earth Sei., 21(10), 1073–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P. S. and Mertie, J. B., Jr. 1930. Geology and mineral resources of northwestern Alaska. U.S. Department of the Interior. Geological Survey. Bulletin 815. Google Scholar
Sumgin, M. I. 1941. Naledi i nalednye bugry (Icings and icing mounds). Priroda, 30(1), 26–33.Google Scholar
Van Autenboer, T. 1962. Ice mounds and melt phenomena in the Sor Rondane, Antarctica. J. Glacial, 4, 349–354.Google Scholar
Wright, C. S. and Priestley, R. E. 1922. British (Terra Nova) Antarctic Expedition 1910 –1913. Glaciology. London, Harrison and Sons.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1.River of meltwater on Koettlitz Glacier Ice Tongue. The dark blotches in the river are granular material resting on the ice bottom. A small 1 m high tracked vehicle is at the tip of the arrow. Dark bands in channel wall are related to ice-fabric variations.

Figure 1

Fig. 2.Conical (by person) and low-elevation linear (foreground) ice blisters in a refrozen “river” on Koettlitz Glacier Ice Tongue.

Figure 2

Fig. 3.A small conical (upper right) and several sinuous ice blisters observed in the Katakturuk River delta, Camden Bay, Beaufort Sea coast, Alaska, in 1980.

Figure 3

Fig. 4.Representative cross-section of a sinuous ice blister studied in the Katakturuk River delta, Alaska. The in situ salinity of the ice-blister water was 0.6‰.