Sepiolite Properties

The rheological properties of thixotropic clay gels are highly dependent on the morphology and charge properties of the particles (Du et al. Reference Du, Liu, Clode and Leong2018; Leong et al. Reference Leong, Du, Au, Clode and Liu2018). The localization and location of the positive and negative charges giving rise to heterogeneous charge attraction and homogeneous charge repulsion are responsible for the complex rheological behavior displayed by these gels. A schematic model of the molecular and crystal structure of fibrous sepiolite (Fig. 1) shows the presence of open and pore channels (Ruiz-Hitzky Reference Ruiz-Hitzky2011) and defines the direction of the three faces. The surface facing the b direction contained the –OH groups originating from the exposed side of the MgO octahedral sheets with pH-dependent charge. These –OH groups should remain positively charged at high pH of ~11 (Kosmulski Reference Kosmulski2009). The end of the fiber facing the c direction should also contain the pH dependent charged groups of the MgO sheet. The direction exposing the tetrahedral silica sheet surface is in the a- direction. The tetrahedral silica sheets possess the edge -Si-OH group which should be negatively charged at low pH, above 2. The chemical formula of the sepiolite from Vallecas, Spain, was analyzed and found to be close to its theoretical value of Mg₈Si₁₂O₃₀(OH)₄(OH₂)₄(H₂O)₈ (Galan & Carretero Reference Galan and Carretero1999). Permanent charge due to isomorphic substitution should, therefore, be quite low in the SiO tetrahedral sheet.

Fig. 1

A schematic model of sepiolite showing open channels and internal pores and molecular and crystalline structure (Ruiz-Hitzky Reference Ruiz-Hitzky2011).

Effect of Sonication Time

The SEM image (Fig. 2) showed that the as-received sepiolite powder was composed of large aggregates of fibrous materials. Loose fibers are seen clearly on the aggregate surface. As a suspension, this fibrous material must be well dispersed, i.e. these aggregates must be broken down into individual fibers. A high-intensity sonication method was employed for this purpose. The effect of sonication time on sepiolite dispersion was evaluated rheologically and via SEM imaging of samples of the dried suspensions obtained after various sonication times. Note that chemical methods for separating the fibers have been reported (Franchini et al. Reference Franchini, Galy and Gérard2009).

Fig. 2

SEM image of sepiolite particles.

The effect of sonication time on the yield stress of sepiolite suspensions (Fig. 3) was that the yield stress increased sharply during the first 3 min and then more gradually. Eventually, the increase stopped and the sonication time at which this occurs depended on the solids concentration. For the 2 and 3 wt.% sepiolite suspensions, the yield stress stopped increasing after 4 min of sonication. For the 5 wt.% suspension, 9 min was required.

Fig. 3

The effect of sonication time on the yield stress of sepiolite suspensions.

Samples of the 5 wt.% suspension at various sonication times were collected and dried for SEM imaging. The images of samples subjected to sonication times of 0, 2, 6, and 10 min (Fig. 4) showed various degrees of dispersion. A high degree of dispersion was indicated by the absence of fiber agglomerates and bundles, and the extent of random fiber orientation. The image of the fiber suspension sonicated for 10 min showed a high degree of dispersion. The image of the sample at zero time showed the presence of large agglomerates. These large agglomerates disappeared upon sonication. However, the images of samples at sonication times of 2 and 6 min showed relatively large regions of fibers orientated in parallel configuration. The sample sonicated for 10 min showed that most fibers were orientated randomly. This is a reflection of a very high degree of fiber separation. An increasing degree of fiber separation can explain the increasing viscosity of sepiolite gel with (1) shear rate and (2) shearing time at a constant shear rate observed by Alvarez et al. (Reference Alvarez, Singer and Galan1984).

Fig. 4

SEM images showing the effect of sonication time on fiber separation. The more random the fiber orientation, the higher the degree of fiber separation.

Yield stress is a measure of the strength of the microstructure in the suspension which depends on the particle and bond concentration forming the structure (Leong et al. Reference Leong, Scales, Healy, Boger and Buscall1993a, Reference Leong, Scales, Healy and Boger1995). Individual sepiolite fibers were released with sonication time, thereby increasing the particle-number density. At the plateau yield stress region (Fig. 3), fiber separation and release became insignificant as the agglomerates were depleted.

Effect of Temperature

The effect of temperature on the yield stress of sepiolite suspension was also investigated. The suspension was kept at various constant temperatures in a water bath. Once the suspension reached a pre-set temperature, its yield stress was measured and its temperature was recorded with a thermometer immediately after the measurement. Before each yield-stress measurement, the suspension was stirred vigorously but briefly with a spatula. The yield stress increased with temperature (Fig. 5). The yield stress of a 3 wt.% sepiolite suspension increased from 10 to 22 Pa as the temperature increased from 10 to 70^oC. Similar behavior was observed with synthetic hectorite gel (Shu et al. Reference Shu, Sun, Liu and Tong2015). For Wyoming bentonite, the apparent viscosity of a 6 wt.% suspension aged at 21^oC displayed a more complex relationship with temperature (Guven Reference Guven, Guven and Pollastro1992b). This suspension displayed an initial decrease to a minimum value at 65°C, followed by a sharp increase with maximum viscosity observed at 85°C. The Hamaker constant of the sepiolite in water should also increase with temperature (Israelachvili Reference Israelachvili2011) and this may play a role in the yield-stress increase.

Fig. 5

The effect of temperature on the yield stress of sepiolite suspensions.

Effect of pH, Ionic Strength, and TSPP

The effect of pH on the yield-stress behavior of 2, 3, and 5 wt.% sepiolite suspensions was recorded as pH was reduced from 12 to 2 (Fig. 6). All three suspensions were dispersed completely at pH >11, manifested by a zero yield stress. The yield stress increased from zero at pH 11 to a maximum value at pH 8, which remained constant in the 8–4 pH range. This stress increased with solids concentration: 8, 35, and 60 Pa for the 2, 3, and 5 wt.% suspensions. A greater particle concentration should lead to the formation of a stronger microstructure. The yield stress was lower at pH <4. Clay is known to become more soluble at low pH and this may be responsible for the lower yield stress at pH <4 (Simonton et al. Reference Simonton, Komarneni and Roy1988). A similar yield stress-pH behavior for palygorskite gel was reported in terms of Bingham yield stress (Neaman & Singer Reference Neaman and Singer2000). For the palygorskite gel with low ionic strength, zero yield stress was observed at pH >9. The constant maximum yield stress was located between pH 2 and 7.

Fig. 6

The effect of pH on the yield stress of sepiolite suspensions: ■, 2 wt.% sepiolite suspension; ●, 3 wt.%; ▲, 5 wt.%; □, 5 wt.% with 2 dwb% TSPP; ○, 5 wt.% with 6 dwb% TSPP.

A similar viscosity-pH behavior was also reported for thixotropic suspensions of brown sepiolite from Turkey (Çınara et al. Reference Çιnara, Can, Sabah, Karagüzel and Çelik2009). The viscosity was very low at pH 11 and increased sharply to a maximum value at pH 8. The viscosity then decreased gradually with decreasing pH.

Ionic strength produced various effects on the yield stress of 5 wt.% sepiolite suspensions (Fig. 7) depending on the pH. The salt concentration evaluated ranged from 0 (deionized water) to 1 M KCl. Ionic strength had no significant effect on the yield stress at pH <8. The insensitivity of sepiolite suspensions to salt concentration is, therefore, only true at pH <8. The effect of ionic strength was quite pronounced at pH >8. The yield stress increased with ionic strength more sharply at higher pH such as 12. The yield-stress behavior was displayed over a broader pH range; e.g. the gels with 0.1 and 1 M KCl registered significant yield stress at pH ~13. The maximum yield stress was then located at a higher pH of ~9.5. This yield stress was much higher for the gels with 0.1 and 1 M KCl than for those prepared with DI water. These two high-salt gels displayed the same maximum yield stress of 90 Pa, 1.5 times larger than that (60 Pa) prepared in DI water. The broadening of the yield-stress behavior from pH 8 to 13 with increasing ionic strength is a classic behavior displayed by suspensions in which the EDL repulsive and van der Waals attractive forces play a significant role in determining the nature and strength of the net interparticle force (Leong et al. Reference Leong, Katiforis, Harding, Healy and Boger1993b). This behavior is normally associated with the pH-dependent charge playing a prominent role in determining the strength of the EDL force at a fixed salt concentration. Zeta potential data presented later will be used to explain the yield-stress state of some of these suspensions.

Fig. 7

Effect of ionic strength or KCl salt concentration on the yield stress of sepiolite suspensions.

The zero yield stress located at pH > 11 (Fig. 6) is a manifestation of the sepiolite fibers interacting repulsively via the EDL force. For the EDL force to dominate the interaction, the fibers must have acquired a sufficient negative charge (Guven Reference Guven, Guven and Pollastro1992a). The net increase will be shown to be due to the simultaneous decrease in the positive charge density and increase in the negative charge density. At high ionic strength, the EDL is compressed, shielding the surface charge. As a result, the fibers can come close enough together for the van der Waals attractive force to dominate the interactions (Sabah et al. Reference Sabah, Mart, Çιnar and Çelik2007). A network structure is then formed and the yield stress is a measure of the strength of this structure. The yield stress at pH > 11 for the high ionic strength gels (Fig. 7) was due to this van der Waals force. The increasing yield stress with ionic strength at any pH above 8 was due to the strengthening of the fiber–fiber bond by a net attractive force increasing in strength, i.e. the van der Waals force minus a diminishing EDL force. The insensitivity of the yield stress to pH and ionic strength at pH between 4 and 8 is quite mysterious. Heterogeneous charge attraction forming the fiber–fiber bond if present should be important in this pH range.

Zeta potential is a measure of the strength of the repulsive force and its sign is an indication of the type of the net charge. The zeta potential-pH behavior of the pristine sepiolite suspension (Fig. 8a) showed the presence of a point of zero zeta potential or zero net charge located at pH ~3.3. Kosmulski (Reference Kosmulski2018) reported that most clay minerals displayed an isoelectric point (IEP) in the pH range of 2 to 4. This sepiolite is net negatively charged over a wide pH range of 3–12, as reflected by the zeta potential being negative in this pH range. The zeta potential decreased from zero at pH 3 to –49 mV at pH 12. An earlier measurement (Fig. 8b) showed a similar result with the zeta potential decreasing from –6 mV at pH 4 to –43 mV at pH 12. A similar IEP of 3.7 was reported for a sepiolite (Pangel S15) with a composition similar to that of Pangel S9 (Sabah et al. Reference Sabah, Mart, Çιnar and Çelik2007). A sepiolite sourced from Hebei, China, displayed a similar IEP of 4 but it displayed a relatively small negative zeta potential of –22 mV at pH 12 (Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Yan, Ouyang, Yang and Chen2018). A similarly low-magnitude zeta potential of –22 to –18 mV was observed for a Turkish sepiolite which, however, displayed a higher IEP of 6.5 (Alkan et al. Reference Alkan, Demirbaş and Doğan2005). The zeta potential (Fig. 8a) showed small changes in value in the pH range of 4 to 8, from –9 to –12 mV, and this corresponded to the pH and ionic strength insensitive yield-stress region. The onset of zero yield stress at pH ~ 10.5 corresponded to a zeta potential of –30 mV. The increasing magnitude of the zeta potential at pH > 8 correlated well with the trend of a decreasing yield stress with pH (Fig. 6).

Fig. 8

The effect of pH on the zeta potential of sepiolite suspensions: (a) without TSPP and (b) with TSPP additives. Pangel S9 displayed an isoelectric point at pH 3 when potentiometrically titrated from high to low pH and at pH 3.7 when titrated in the reverse direction.

The maximum yield stress in the pH range 4 to 8 corresponded to a zeta potential of ~–10 mV. This suggests the presence of (1) a relatively weak EDL repulsive force and (2) another attractive force in addition to the van der Waals force. In most clays, this attractive force is the positive-negative charge attraction. The zeta potential of sepiolite treated with TSPP should confirm the presence of positive charge sites. This insensitivity of the yield stress to ionic strength at pH = 4–8, suggested that (1) the EDL repulsive force was insignificant and (2) the strength of the heterogeneous charge attraction at fiber–fiber contact was not dependent on ionic strength.

Polyphosphate additives are known peptizers for clay slurries (Bergaya & Lagaly Reference Bergaya, Lagaly, Bergaya, Theng and Lagaly2006). These additives can have as many as 20–30 negative charges per molecule depending on the degree of polymerization. Upon adsorption, they neutralize the positive edge charges, thus increasing the negative charge density of the clay particles. TSPP has a significant effect on the yield stress and the zeta potential of sepiolite suspensions (Figs 6 and 8b). TSPP increased the magnitude of the negative zeta potential, shifted the onset of the zero yield-stress region to a lower pH, decreased the maximum yield stress, and shifted it to a lower pH. The pH region for the zero yield stress is now located at pH > 6 for suspensions treated with 6 dwb% TSPP and pH > 7 for those treated with 2 dwb% TSPP. The maximum yield stress of these two treated suspensions was reduced by 20 Pa to ~40 Pa and located at pH <4. Between pH 2 and 4, the yield stress appeared to be constant.

The magnitude of the negative zeta potential increased with TSPP concentration. This is a strong indication that sepiolite possesses positive charge sites to adsorb the TSPP. The location of these charge sites and the manner in which they interact attractively with the negative charge sites of other fibers will be explored in a subsequent section. Adsorbed TSPP enhanced the EDL repulsive force between the fibers. As a result, this force dominated the fiber–fiber interaction at a lower pH, as reflected by the shifted of the onset of the zero yield stress. The onset of the zero yield stress also corresponded to a zeta potential of –30 mV.

The Flow Behavior of Sepiolite Suspensions

The viscosity-shear rate behavior of sepiolite suspensions with concentration ranging from 2 to 5 wt.% (Fig. 9) showed pronounced shear-thinning behavior in the 5 to 1000 s^–1 shear rate range. The decrease in the viscosity with shear rate was linear on a log-log scale at all solid loadings. The linear relationship is a classic example of a power law flow behavior. In terms of viscosity, the power law model is given by:

(1) $\mu =K\gamma {.}^{n-1}$

where μ is the viscosity; K, the consistency index; γ̇, the shear rate; and n, the power index. The slope of the linear relationship between μ and γ̇ plotted on a log scale is n–1. The power law index (Table 1) was 0.15±0.01, 0.17±0.01, 0.18±0.01, and 0.16±0.01 for the sepiolite suspensions with 2, 3, 4, and 5 wt.% solids. The power law indexes were numerically very close to each other so the power law index could be regarded as independent of solid loading. Its corresponding consistency index K (Table 1) was 5.0±0.1×10³, 10.0±0.3×10³, 17.4±0.4×10³, and 31.6±0.7×10³. The shear thinning behavior was attributed to an increasing degree of fiber bond breakage and alignment with shear rates. At pH >9, the viscosity decreased sharply with pH and the rheological behavior became Newtonian (data not shown).

Fig. 9

The flow behavior of sepiolite suspensions

Table 1

The power law parameters for the flow behavior of sepiolite suspensions.

a: Data reported with standard error

The Ageing Behavior

The freshly prepared suspensions were left at rest for a few days to allow surface charging, ion transport, and hydration to reach the SCE state. The SCE state was determined by yield stress (measured immediately after the suspension was agitated or sheared) becoming independent of time since preparation (Fig. 10). The sepiolite suspensions reached the SCE state almost immediately after preparation.

Fig. 10

The determination of the surface chemical equilibrium state. The yield stress was measured immediately after vigorous stirring or shearing of the suspension.

A unique feature of 2:1 platy clay minerals is the localization of the different types of surface charge, i.e. the pH- dependent charge on the edge of the octahedral sheet of alumina or magnesia and the permanent negative charge on the tetrahedral silica face. These localized heterogeneous charges cause the clay particles in suspension to experience both repulsive (EDL) and attractive (positive-negative charge) forces at the same time. These forces caused the platelet clay particles to form a 3-D network structure in suspension at very dilute concentration of a few percent solids. Another important contributing factor is the nano-size of the clay particles (Du et al. Reference Du, Liu, Clode and Leong2018; Leong et al. Reference Leong, Du, Au, Clode and Liu2018). This structure should break down upon shearing. For a thixotropic clay gel this structure recovered with time, if undisturbed. Structural recovery is usually reflected by the yield stress increasing with ageing time. The 3-D network structure formation and heterogeneous charge fiber interaction of the thixotropic sepiolite gel are next to be examined for comparison with that obtained for the platy 2:1 clay mineral gels.

Pre-sheared sepiolite suspensions were found to display similar time-dependent behavior. Increasing yield stress with ageing time was observed for sepiolite suspensions with concentration ranging from 2 to 5 wt.% solids (Fig. 11). The yield stress continued to increase after 10,000 min (~7 days). The structural recovery process was, thus, very long. Depending on the solids loading, the time for the structure to recover fully was between 6 and 70 days. The dilute suspensions took less time. The yield stress of the fully aged suspensions was 3–5 times larger than the initial yield stress. Most of the increase in yield stress occurred in the first two weeks of ageing. The yield stress reached >80% of the fully recovered state yield stress during this period. Note that the error bar of the yield stress data is smaller than the size of the legend (Fig. 11).

Fig. 11

The ageing behavior of sepiolite suspensions. Symbols ■●▲▼: experimental data; Line: Leong model with parameters as in Table 2.

An ageing model, the Leong model based on Smoluchowski rate theory and second-order aggregation kinetics (de Kretser & Boger Reference de Kretser and Boger2001), is commonly used to describe the long-time ageing behavior of clay gels (Chang & Leong Reference Chang and Leong2014; Sehly et al. Reference Sehly, Chiew, Li, Song, Leong and Huang2015; Leong et al. Reference Leong, Du, Au, Clode and Liu2018). It is a three-parameter model given by (de Kretser & Boger Reference de Kretser and Boger2001; Yoon & el Mohtar Reference Yoon and El Mohtar2013):

(2) ${\tau }_y\left(t\right)={\tau }_{y\infty }{\left(1-\frac{1-{\left(\frac{{\tau }_{y0}}{{\tau }_{y\infty }}\right)}^{3/2}}{1+K_{r}t}\right)}^{2/3}$

where τ _y (t) is the time-dependent yield stress; τ _y0, the initial yield stress measured at 0 min; τ _y∞ , the yield stress at complete structural recovery; and K _r , the inverse of the Leong model time constant.

With τ _y0 and τ _y∞ known, only the parameter K _r of the Leong model is unknown. The model was reorganized into a linear relationship:

(3) $\frac{\left(1-{\left(\frac{{\tau }_{\mathrm{yo}}}{{\tau }_{y\infty }}\right)}^{1.5}\right)}{\left(1-{\left(\frac{{\tau }_{y\left(t\right)}}{{\tau }_{y\infty }}\right)}^{1.5}\right)}=K_r\ast t+1$

or:

(4) $y=\mathrm{mx}+c$

with m = K _r , c should be 1 according to the model.

A linear regression fit of the experimentally determined x-y data set was applied to obtain the m or K _r value. Note that the error was very large at yield stress τ _y (t) close to the equilibrium yield stress τ _y∞ value at long ageing time due to the denominator being very small – the product of the difference between two values with the variable being close to 1. The c value (Table 2) was indeed close to 1 for all four sepiolite concentrations. The standard error provided by the linear regression result is included in Table 2.

Table 2

The Leong model parameters obtained by linear regression using Origin software.

a: Data reported with standard error

The linear regression fitting of the ageing data to obtain K _r of the Leong model (Table 2) produced fits with correlation (R ² ) values ranging from 0.92 to 0.97. The Leong model fit to the experimental data (Fig. 11) performed generally well for the suspensions with 3, 4, and 5 wt.% solids. The time constant, 1/K _r , was determined to be 1.4±0.2×10³, 1.8±0.2×10³, 3.0±0.4×10³, and 3.1±0.3×10³ min for the 2, 3, 4, and 5 wt.% suspensions, respectively. Another method of looking at the effect of fiber concentration on the structural reformation kinetics is to compare the time taken to reach a given multiple of the measured yield stress at zero ageing time. The time taken to reach three times the measured yield stress at zero ageing time was observed to increase with fiber concentration, viz., 1300, 11,300, 19,300, and 22,100 min for the 2, 3, 4, and 5 wt.% suspensions, respectively. For the time taken to increase the yield stress by a factor of two, the trend is the same: 190 min for 2 wt.% and much longer times at high concentration. These longer times are quite similar for the 3 to 5 wt.% solids, 840 to 970 min. The high-fiber concentration slows the kinetics of reaching the structural state of minimum free energy.

A 4 wt.% sepiolite suspension was prepared, employing only 3 min of sonication instead of 10 min to show the effect of fiber separation on the ageing behavior of the suspension (Fig. 12). The yield stress was lower compared to the same solids suspension shown in Fig. 11. Despite a lower degree of fiber separation, the suspension still displayed time-dependent behavior. The yield stress continued to increase even after 3 weeks of ageing. The result also showed good reproducibility of the ageing result. In the first ageing cycle, the pre-sheared suspension was aged for 18 days (solid square symbol) and then sheared again for the second ageing cycle (open circle). This cycle lasted for 21 days. Excellent reproducibility was observed in the first 10 days.

Fig. 12

Ageing behavior of sepiolite suspension sonicated for 3 min and its reproducibility.

The Gel Microstructure

SEM images (Fig. 13) revealed the microstructure of the 5 wt.% sepiolite suspension with an equivalent KCl concentration of ~0.001 M. The SEM images also showed, at various magnifications, the microstructure of the sample prepared at high pressure (~2000 bar) and rapid freezing (Fig. 13a, b, c). In these images the fibers are long and straight and appear very rigid. The colloidal nature of these fibers is reflected by its diameter being much smaller than 200 nm. The length is certainly >1 μm. The ice-affected microstructure formed by plunge freezing at atmospheric pressure can be seen in Fig. 13d (Norrish & Rausell-Colom Reference Norrish and Rausell-Colom1962). The hexagonal ice formed in the process pushed the fibers together to form large, thick sheets. Some of these sheets were >10 μm long. A SEM image of a critical-point dried gel sample from the same clay deposit (Vallecas) did not show the same microstructure (Simonton et al. Reference Simonton, Komarneni and Roy1988). Regions of high-fiber aggregation were present and individual fibers were rarely seen. Critical point drying was employed to eliminate surface tension forces during air drying and is supposed to preserve the gel microstructure (Anderson Reference Anderson1951). The alcohol treatment could have affected the fiber interaction configuration and hence the microstructure.

Fig. 13

The microstructure of 5 wt.% sepiolite suspension: (a) high-pressure freezing – 20× magnification; (b) high-pressure freezing – 50× magnification; (c) high-pressure freezing – 100× magnification; (d) plunge freezing (ice-affected structure).

The low-magnification image (Fig. 13a) showed a high concentration of fibers organized in a random fashion. The higher-magnification images (Fig. 13b and c) showed fibers interacting in the cross configuration, in which one fiber can interact with several fibers. The crossing point between the interacting fibers or rods was located at any point along the length of the sepiolite particles. Some of the crossing points were near the end of the fiber. The angle of the cross fibers varied. Some were interacting close to 90^o but most were at less than 90^o. This attractive crossing interaction configuration was responsible for the 3-D connected microstructure and the yield stress of the gel. A perfect parallel interaction configuration was not seen in these images, but a non-perfect parallel configuration was observed. The fibers interacting in this configuration showed a finite separation distance, suggesting a strong repulsive interaction. The concentration of the cross-fiber interaction was relatively low. This suggests that only specific orientations of the faces of the fibers give rise to attractive interaction. Impurities, which are usually irregular in shape, appeared to be absent from the microstructure. This was also observed in the microstructure of bentonite gel (Du et al. Reference Du, Liu, Clode and Leong2019) and as-received hectorite (SCHa-1) gel with 50 wt.% impurities (Au et al. Reference Au, Du, Liu, Bashirul Haq and Leong2019). The relationship between maximum yield stress and hectorite content was the same for purified and unpurified hectorite gel. Hectorite was, therefore, the only active ingredient controlling the rheological property of the gel that did interact with impurities in any significant manner.

The fiber–fiber bond in the cross configuration should be formed by heterogeneous charge and van der Waals attraction (Fig. 14a). This should occur between the faces of the fibers in the b and a directions. Heterogeneous charge attraction can occur between the positive charge of the surface –Mg-OH and the permanent negative charge of the tetrahedral SiO₂ layer or the negative charge of the edge –Si-OH groups. Attractive interaction in the parallel configuration between fibers in the b and a directions was not observed either. This suggests that the repulsive force dominates the interaction. The end–face interaction between fibers in the c and a directions was not observed either. Evidence indicating the participation of the edge –Si-OH group in attractive fiber–fiber interactions was reported by Aznar et al. (Reference Aznar, Casal, Ruiz-Hitzky, Lopez-Arbeloa, Lopez-Arbeloa, Santaren and Alvarez1992). The peptization of the sepiolite gel by methylene blue was presented as the evidence. The positively charged methylene blue adsorbed and neutralized the negative charge of the –Si-OH group.

Fig. 14

A schematic diagram showing (a) attractive and (b) repulsive surface–surface interactions of sepiolite fibers. Only one structural SiO₂-MgO-SiO₂ element of the surface showing the nature of the net surface charge was used to illustrate the attractive and repulsive interaction.

Repulsive interaction should occur between the negatively charged silica faces of the fibers (in the a direction) whether in the cross or parallel configuration (Fig. 14b). This repulsive interaction was responsible for keeping the fibers apart and opening up the network structure. The thixotropic behavior occurring at very dilute concentration (2 wt.% suspension) is a reflection of this very open network structure in this gel. Each fiber experienced both attractive and repulsive forces from interactions with its nearest neighbors. During the initial state of ageing, all fibers in the network experienced a net force. These fibers will have to move or orient to attain a state of force balance involving some degree of bond breakage and formation. This process takes a long time, which was reflected in the long time scale of the ageing behavior. This fiber movement or orientation should stop when the zero net force equilibrium state is attained. At this state, the global free energy of this microstructure should be zero. AFM characterization of the fiber–fiber interactions (Mizuno et al. Reference Mizuno, Luengo and Rutland2010) is an ideal way of establishing the presence of repulsive and attractive interactions in the face-face cross-fiber configuration. Multiple fiber pair interactions may be needed to show in a statistically significant manner that both repulsive and attraction interactions are present, as identifying the a and b direction faces is not possible. A new technique for mounting 100 nm diameter fibers for such characterization may need to be developed.