Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T03:29:30.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biogeophysical properties of an expansive Antarctic supraglacial stream

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2016

Michael D. SanClements*
Affiliation:
INSTAAR, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Heidi J. Smith
Affiliation:
Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA
Christine M. Foreman
Affiliation:
Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA
Marco Tedesco
Affiliation:
City College of New York, New York, NY 10031, USA
Yu-Ping Chin
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Christopher Jaros
Affiliation:
INSTAAR, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Diane M. McKnight
Affiliation:
INSTAAR, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Supraglacial streams are important hydrologic features in glaciated environments as they are conduits for the transport of aeolian debris, meltwater, solutes and microbial communities. We characterized the basic geomorphology, hydrology and biogeochemistry of the Cotton Glacier supraglacial stream located in the McMurdo Dry Valleys of Antarctica. The distinctive geomorphology of the stream is driven by accumulated aeolian sediment from the Transantarctic Mountains, while solar radiation and summer temperatures govern melt in the system. The hydrologic functioning of the Cotton Glacier stream is largely controlled by the formation of ice dams that lead to vastly different annual flow regimes and extreme flushing events. Stream water is chemically dilute and lacks a detectable humic signature. However, the fluorescent signature of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in the stream does demonstrate an extremely transitory red-shifted signal found only in near-stream sediment leachates and during the initial flushing of the system at the onset of flow. This suggests that episodic physical flushing drives pulses of DOM with variable quality in this stream. This is the first description of a large Antarctic supraglacial stream and our results provide evidence that the hydrology and geomorphology of supraglacial streams drive resident microbial community composition and biogeochemical cycling.

Information

Type
Biological Sciences
Copyright
© Antarctic Science Ltd 2016 
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Composite image of the Cotton Glacier and Cotton Glacier stream system on 21 December 2010. The red ‘X’ denotes the location of sampling during the 2010–11 summer. The red ‘XD’ is the location of the grab sample collected from below the moulins in 2011. The direction of stream flow is from ‘X’ toward ‘XD’ in this image.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Aerial drone image of the Cotton Glacier stream system showing the large sediment deposits occurring on the glacier surface and the deeply incised channel. The red ‘X’ represents the main sampling site for the 2010–11 summer. The direction of stream flow is from the bottom toward the top of the image.

Figure 2

Fig. 3 Spectral unmixing coefficients for water for a. 19 November and b. 21 December 2010. Blue to green values indicate cases when the near-infrared (NIR) reflectance acquired in December is lower than the one acquired in November, and the opposite is true for red to yellow. Large positive increases (yellow) occur mostly over snow or glacier areas. Dark blue represents the largest negative changes and correspond to the presence, extension or insurgence of water bodies.

Figure 3

Fig. 4 Records of total annual flow volume for the Onyx River from 1969–2014. Measurements are recorded every 15 min throughout the active season (http://www.mcmlter.org/index.html).

Figure 4

Fig. 5 Air temperature, incoming radiation and stream depth for the Cotton Glacier stream system during the 2010–11 summer. a. Peak stream depth and b. the stream immediately following the rapid draining event that occurred on 13–14 December 2010.

Figure 5

Table I Cotton Glacier stream chemistry for the 2009–10 and 2010–11 field seasons.

Figure 6

Fig. 6 Excitation emission matrices (EEMs) from a. the Cotton Glacier stream and b. the Canada Glacier stream in the McMurdo Dry Valleys. Note the absence of a humic signature in the Cotton Glacier EEM (i.e. peak Ex:320-360 Em:420-460 and Ex:260 Em:400-460 regions).

Figure 7

Fig. 7 Excitation emission matrices (EEMs) from sediment extracts and water collected from the Cotton Glacier stream a. above the water line prior to submergence during the 2009–10 summer, b. during the initial pulse of water as the stream began to flow in 2009, and c. above the water line during the 2010–11 summer. The stream water sample collected early in the 2009–10 summer demonstrates the same fluorescence signature as the leachates suggesting that dilute glacial meltwaters flush dry sediment resulting in a pulse of dissolved organic matter.

Figure 8

Fig. 8 Excitation emission matrix (EEM) from below the Cotton Glacier moulins.