Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T14:14:42.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Consumption of lipid-rich seed arils improves larval development in a Neotropical primarily carnivorous ant, Odontomachus chelifer (Ponerinae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2014

Claudia Bottcher
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, C.P. 6109, 13083–862 Campinas SP, Brazil
Paulo S. Oliveira*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 13083-862, Campinas SP, Brazil
*
2Corresponding author. Email: pso@unicamp.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Odontomachus chelifer ants collect fallen arillate seeds of Cabralea canjerana (Meliaceae), a bird-dispersed tree of the Atlantic rain forest. In the nest the larvae are fed with the lipid-rich aril, and the viable seed is discarded. Benefits from secondary seed dispersal by ants are well documented for tropical plants, but benefits to ants from consuming vertebrate-dispersed diaspores are uncertain. Twelve captive colonies of O. chelifer were used to investigate the effect of aril consumption on larval development. Treatment colonies were supplemented with 1 g of C. canjerana arils, whereas control colonies were supplemented with 1 g of synthetic diet. Egg and larval production did not differ between experimental colonies after 5 mo. Aril-fed larvae, however, grew 3.5 times larger than those in control colonies. Essential fatty acids in the arils possibly account for improved larval development. Consumption of lipid-rich arils may be critical under scarcity of arthropod prey. Improved larval development through aril consumption confirms that this ant-seed interaction is facultatively mutualistic. This result is meaningful given the predominantly carnivorous diet of O. chelifer, and the generalized nature of ant-seed/fruit interactions in tropical forests. Whether or not benefits to larvae translate into significant gains for ant colonies is uncertain.

Information

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Interaction between Odontomachus chelifer and arillate seeds of Cabralea canjerana. Worker inspecting a fallen seed on the leaf litter; the red lipid-rich aril eventually will be removed and fed to larvae in the nest (photograph by H. Soares Jr.) (a). Mean number of larvae through time (October 2009–February 2010) in ant colonies treated with a food supplementation of 1 g of seed arils, and in control colonies supplemented with 1 g of synthetic ant diet; aril supplementation did not affect total number of larvae produced (F(1) = 2.61, P = 0.137); diet treatment × time was not significant (F(4,1) = 1.90, P = 0.130) (N = 6 colonies per group; whiskers represent 95% confidence intervals) (b). Mean number of larvae per weight category in experimental colonies after 5 mo of diet supplementation; larval size categories range 7.52 mg: A = 0.06–7.58 mg; B = 7.59–15.1 mg; C = 15.1–22.6 mg (F(2,1) = 4.85, P = 0.016; whiskers represent 95% confidence intervals) (c).