Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T04:15:28.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transport properties of warm dense matter behind intense shock waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2014

V. B. Mintsev*
Affiliation:
Institute of Problems of Chemical Physics RAS, Chernogolovka, Russia Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia State University of Moscow, Institution of Physics & Technology, Dolgoprudnyi, Russia
V. E. Fortov
Affiliation:
Institute of Problems of Chemical Physics RAS, Chernogolovka, Russia Joint Institute for High Temperatures RAS, Moscow, Russia State University of Moscow, Institution of Physics & Technology, Dolgoprudnyi, Russia
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Victor Mintsev, Institute of Problems of Chemical Physics RAS, Pr. Semenova 1, Chernogolovka, 142432, Russia. E-mail: minvb@icp.ac.ru

Abstract

This report presents the overview of the results of investigation of transport properties of warm dense matter in the conditions with strong coupling generated as a result of the shock or multiple shock compression of substance up to the megabar pressure range. We consider the results of measurements of the electrical conductivity in two different regions. The first one is the high temperature region, where the temperatures are of the order or much higher than the ionization potential I of the compressed substance. The region of “pressure ionization” where T ≪ I is the most interesting from the point of view of the specific plasma phase transitions. A few amounts of experimental data on shock compressed matter viscosity are discussed. For the estimations of shear viscosity of strongly coupled plasma experimental data on measurements of electrical conductivity of hydrogen, deuterium and rare gases under intense shock compression were used. It is shown that the ratio of shear viscosity coefficient to volume density of entropy of strongly coupled plasma is of the order of a lower bound, predicted by Kovtun et al. (2005) in frames of string theory methods.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Linear explosively driven shock tube. (1) Detonator; (2) High explosive lens; (3) High explosive; (4) Glass tube; (5) Investigated gas.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Voitenko compressor. (1) High explosive; (2) Flying plate; (3) Compression chamber; (4) glass tube.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. HE gun. (1) Detonator; (2) High explosive lens; (3) High explosive; (4) Flying plate; (5) Experimental vessel.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Hemispherical experimental device. (1) Frame; (2) Base; (3) Screen; (4) Sample; (5) Housing; (6) Optical sensors; (7) Measuring line; (8) Explosive; (9) Air gap; (10) Impactor.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Pressure ionization of non-ideal hydrogen plasma.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Energy spectrum of compressed hydrogen as a function of the Wigner-Seitz sphere size. Rnl(rs) and R'nl(rs) are the radial wave function and its derivative.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Electrical conductivity of water.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Electrical conductivity of sulfur.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Chemical compression. Structure of the AlH3 molecule.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Electrical conductivity of alane vs. the partial volume of hydrogen.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Electrical conductivity and adiabatic compressibility of deuterium plasma.

Figure 11

Fig. 12. Dimensionless Coulomb component of electrical conductivity of nonideal plasma at high temperatures T ~ J.

Figure 12

Fig. 13. Curves for coefficients of reflection (R) of laser beam vs. electron concentration. ν/ωL is the ratio of the frequency of electron collisions to the laser beam frequency.

Figure 13

Fig. 14. Structure and electron density distribution for high-pressure phase and pressure-induced “dielectrization” of degenerate lithium plasma. The arrows indicate the breaks of conductivity, which are attributed to the appearance of a new (indicated nearby) phase and metallic conductivity; the numerals near the dots are calculated temperatures.

Figure 14

Fig. 15. Phase diagram of lithium (Tamblyn, 2008).

Figure 15

Fig. 16. Dependence of the ratio of shear viscosity coefficient to the volume density of entropy on coupling parameter.