Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T23:10:34.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revival, Recognition, Restitution: Indigenous Rights in the Eastern Caribbean—ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2016

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Information

Type
Erratum
Information
International Journal of Cultural Property , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , August 2016, pp. 341
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2016 

doi: 10.1017/S0940739116000096

In Strecker’s article “Revival, Recognition, Restitution: Indigenous Rights in the Eastern Caribbean,” there was an error in the Endnotes section. An additional endnote (“43. Morales Padrón 2012”) was improperly inserted. It should not have been present, and all subsequent endnotes in the Endnotes section should have been renumbered appropriately. With the removal of the endnote and subsequent renumbering in the endnote section, the numbering in the article itself is correct as previously shown.

As well, the corresponding sentence with the improper endnote (page 8, lines 12–15) should have read: “Indeed, Maximilian Forte notes that in the early years of British administration, Trinidad was portrayed as a virtual ‘terra nullius.’43”

The publisher sincerely regrets these errors. The original article has been updated with the proper numbering in the Endnotes section.

References

REFERENCE

Strecker, Amy. 2016. “Revival, Recognition, Restitution: Indigenous Rights in the Eastern Caribbean.” International Journal of Cultural Property 23, no. 2: 167–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar