Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T02:23:32.153Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Successful hearing improvement with direct acoustic stimulation in a patient with schizophrenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2018

J Rebol*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Maribor University Clinical Center, Koper, Slovenia Medical Faculty, University of Maribor, Koper, Slovenia
M Kravos
Affiliation:
Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technologies, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia
M Ložar
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Maribor University Clinical Center, Koper, Slovenia
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Janez Rebol, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Maribor University Clinical Center, Ljubljanska 5, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia E-mail: janez.rebol@guest.arnes.si
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

A direct acoustic cochlear implant provides its power directly to the inner ear by vibrating the perilymph via a conventional stapes prosthesis. Our experience with a patient with severe mixed hearing loss due to otosclerosis is described.

Case report

The patient, a 47-year-old male, had a pre-operative speech recognition score of 10 per cent and had been treated for many years for schizophrenia, both of which made him a poor candidate for a direct acoustic stimulation device. Nevertheless, the surgery was performed, which preserved the pre-operative bone conduction level and significantly improved hearing. His speech recognition score rose to 100 per cent. He uses the device all day and his auditory hallucinations have subsided. Improvement of schizophrenia symptoms has enabled the patient to reduce his psychiatric medications intake.

Conclusion

Hearing restoration was the main reason for the reduction of auditory hallucinations in our patient. Hearing loss is a potentially reversible risk factor for psychosis, but this association is often overlooked.

Information

Type
Clinical Records
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited, 2018 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Control radiograph after implantation of a direct acoustic cochlear stimulation device.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Pre-operative pure tone audiogram for (a) right ear/free field testing 1 and (b) left ear/free field testing 2 (symbols around the 120 dB HL mark indicate uncomfortable loudness level). [ = bone conduction (masked) right ear; ○ = air conduction (unmasked) right ear; ] = bone conduction (masked) left ear; × = air conduction (unmasked) left ear

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Free field audiogram with the Codacs™ Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant System device (upper line). Lower line presents post-operative hearing threshold, which is similar to the pre-operative threshold. ○ = air conduction (unmasked) right ear