Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T07:50:26.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High altitude hypoxia and blood pressure dysregulation in adult chickens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2012

E. A. Herrera
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Función y Reactividad Vascular, Programa de Fisiopatología, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
C. E. Salinas
Affiliation:
Instituto Boliviano de Biología de Altura, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Mayor de San Andrés, La Paz, Bolivia
C. E. Blanco
Affiliation:
National Children's Research Centre, Our Lady's Children's Hospital, Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland
M. Villena
Affiliation:
Instituto Boliviano de Biología de Altura, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Mayor de San Andrés, La Paz, Bolivia
D. A. Giussani*
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
*
*Address for correspondence: Prof. D. A. Giussani, Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EG, UK. Email dag26@cam.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although it is accepted that impaired placental perfusion in complicated pregnancy can slow fetal growth and programme an increased risk of cardiovascular dysfunction at adulthood, the relative contribution of reductions in fetal nutrition and in fetal oxygenation as the triggering stimulus remains unclear. By combining high altitude (HA) with the chick embryo model, we have previously isolated the direct effects of HA hypoxia on embryonic growth and cardiovascular development before hatching. This study isolated the effects of developmental hypoxia on cardiovascular function measured in vivo in conscious adult male and female chickens. Chick embryos were incubated, hatched and raised at sea level (SL, nine males and nine females) or incubated, hatched and raised at HA (seven males and seven females). At 6 months of age, vascular catheters were inserted under general anaesthesia. Five days later, basal blood gas status, basal cardiovascular function and cardiac baroreflex responses were investigated. HA chickens had significantly lower basal arterial PO2 and haemoglobin saturation, and significantly higher haematocrit than SL chickens, independent of the sex of the animal. HA chickens had significantly lower arterial blood pressure than SL chickens, independent of the sex of the animal. Although the gain of the arterial baroreflex was decreased in HA relative to SL male chickens, it was increased in HA relative to SL female chickens. We show that development at HA lowers basal arterial blood pressure and alters baroreflex sensitivity in a sex-dependent manner at adulthood.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease 2012 
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Arterial blood gas status in sea level (SL) and high altitude (HA) adult chickens. Values are the mean ± s.e.m. for pH (a), pO2 (b), pCO2 (c), O2 haemoglobin saturation (d, SaO2) and haematocrit (e, Ht) in nine males and nine female chickens incubated, hatched and raised at SL (□) and in seven male and seven female chickens incubated, hatched and raised at HA (▪). There was no effect of sex on arterial blood gas status either at SL or at HA. Therefore, these data were grouped at each altitude. Significant differences (P < 0.05) are: *SL v. HA (Two-way ANOVA + Student–Newman–Keuls post-hoc test).

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Basal cardiovascular function in sea level (SL) and high altitude (HA) adult chickens. Values are the mean ± s.e.m. for systolic arterial pressure (a, SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (b, DAP), mean arterial pressure (c, MAP), heart rate (d, HR), pulse interval (e, PI) and the rate-pressure product (f, RPP) in nine males and nine female chickens incubated, hatched and raised at SL (white solid and white hatched bars) and in seven male and seven female chickens incubated, hatched and raised at HA (black solid and black hatched bars). Significant differences (P < 0.05) are: †male v. female, same altitude (hypoxia independent of sex) or *SL v. HA, for same sex (sex independent of hypoxia). There was no interaction between hypoxia and sex (Two-way ANOVA + Student–Newman–Keuls post-hoc test).

Figure 2

Fig. 3 Baroreflex function in sea level (SL) and high altitude (HA) adult chickens. Values are the mean ± s.e.m. for cardiac baroreflex function curves (a) and the gain of the cardiac baroreflex (b) in nine males and nine female chickens incubated, hatched and raised at SL and in seven male and seven female chickens incubated, hatched and raised at HA. Groups are sea level males (white circles, white bars), HA males (black circles, black bars), SL females (white squares, white hatched bars) and HA females (black squares, black hatched bars) chickens. Significant differences (P < 0.05) are: †male v. female, same altitude (hypoxia independent of sex) or *SL v. HA, for same sex (sex independent of hypoxia). There was no interaction between hypoxia and sex (Two-way ANOVA + Student–Newman–Keuls post-hoc test). The calculation of the baroreflex gain required two steps. The first step was the calculation of the slope of the heart rate (HR)–blood pressure relationship and the maximum and minimum values for HR for each animal. This was achieved by plotting the minute-by-minute HR and blood pressure responses during the beginning of the infusion period from baseline to plateau. Only the period from baseline to plateau is used to avoid confounding by resetting of the baroreflex. Arterial blood pressure and HR responses to the drugs were fitted to sigmoidal curves as follows: HR = HRmin + ((HRmax − HRmin)/(1 + 10(Mid-point-MAP) × Gain coefficient). The value for gain represents the gain coefficient of the Hill slope that describes the steepness of the curve. The second step was to calculate the baroreflex sensitivity according to McDowall and Dampney30 applying the values for gain, maximum and minimum HR to the following equation: Baroreflex Gain = ((HRmax − HRmin) × Gain coefficient)/4, The three points with s.e.m. on the curve represent the summary measures of the analysis: the gain and maximum and minimum HR values.

Figure 3

Table 1 Body weight and dimensions in SL and HA adult chickens