Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T05:58:20.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Outcome factors of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy in children – a long-term follow-up review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2007

Vitor Manuel P. Azevedo
Affiliation:
Department of Research, National Institute of Cardiology Laranjeiras, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Marco Aurelio Santos
Affiliation:
Department of Research, National Institute of Cardiology Laranjeiras, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Francisco M. Albanesi Filho
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, University of Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil
M'árcia B. Castier
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, University of Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil
Bernardo R. Tura
Affiliation:
Department of Research, National Institute of Cardiology Laranjeiras, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Jose Geraldo C. Amino
Affiliation:
Department of Research, National Institute of Cardiology Laranjeiras, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy in children has a high rate of mortality. Cardiac transplantation is the treatment of choice in those who fail to respond to therapeutics. Several studies have been carried out to determine unfavourable prognoses, and to provide an early indication for cardiac transplantation. Nevertheless, no consensus has been reached on the matter. Objective: To propose predictors of death in children with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Methods: We reviewed data extending over 22 years from 142 consecutive children with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, of whom 36 died. The criterions for inclusion were the presence of congestive heart failure or cardiomegaly in a routine chest X-ray, confirmed by enlargement and hypo kinesis of the left ventricle in the echocardiogram. We included asymptomatic children in functional class I. Based on Cox's analysis of clinical and laboratory data, we sought any predictors of death. Results: In univariate analysis, the predictors were functional class IV at presentation (p equal to 0.0001), dyspnoea (p equal to 0.0096), and reduced pedal pulses (p equal to 0.0413). In chest X-ray, they were maximal cardiothoracic ratio (p equal to 0.0001) and pulmonary congestion (p equal to 0.0072). In the electrocardiogram, right atrium overload (p equal to 0.0118), ventricular arrhythmias (p equal to 0.0148) and heart rate (p equal to 0.027). In the echocardiogram, mitral regurgitation of grade 3 to 4 (p equal to 0.002), the left atrial to aortic ratio (p equal to 0.0001), and left ventricle ejection fraction (p equal to 0.0266). In multivariate analysis, the independent predictors were maximum cardiothoracic ratio (p equal to 0.0001), left ventricle ejection fraction (p equal to 0.0013), mitral regurgitation of grade 3 or 4 (p equal to 0.0017), functional class IV at presentation (p equal to 0.0028), and ventricular arrhythmias (p equal to 0.0253). Conclusion: Children, who have these predictors of death should be considered for early heart transplantation when no improvement is observed in clinical treatment.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Cumulative proportional survival and confidence interval of 95% of the 142 children and adolescents with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Figure 1

Table 1.

Figure 2

Table 2.

Figure 3

Table 3.

Figure 4

Table 4.

Figure 5

Cardiothoracic ratio and confidence interval of 95%, by time of follow-up (months), between groups (alive versus dead).

Figure 6

Survival analysis by Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test by groups of ventricular arrhythmias with confidence interval of 95%.

Figure 7

Heart rate on electrocardiogram and confidence interval of 95%, by time of follow-up (months), between groups (alive versus dead).

Figure 8

Left ventricle ejection fraction and confidence interval of 95%, by time of follow-up (months), between groups (alive versus dead).

Figure 9

Left atrium/aorta ratio and confidence interval of 95%, by time of follow-up (months), between groups (alive versus dead).

Figure 10

Table 5.

Figure 11

Table 6.

Figure 12

Receiver operating curve of maximum cardiothoracic ratio reached (a) and left ventricular ejection fraction (b).