Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T22:29:58.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Participatory action research: researching with disenfranchised populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2014

W Hill and
T Koch
W Hill
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
T Koch
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Information

Type
Abstracts from ‘Brainwaves’— The Australasian Society for Psychiatric Research Annual Meeting 2006, 6–8 December, Sydney, Australia
Information
Acta Neuropsychiatrica , Volume 18 , Issue 6 , December 2006, pp. 292
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 Blackwell Munksgaard

Background:

The aim of this study was to position participatory action research (PAR) as a vital, dynamic and relevant approach that can be used when researching disenfranchised populations. PAR enables people to contribute their ideas, and plan and partake in effective action to improve their lives.

Method:

We have developed a chronic illness research program that has been guided by participatory principles. Research to date includes the following: the needs of people who were learning to live with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the intrusion of fatigue, learning alongside older people with asthma, people (homeless men living with schizophrenia) who experienced incontinence, Aboriginal elders who wanted to develop strategies to bring their plight of the high incidence of diabetes to the attention of their community, and women who were homeless and had been sexually violated as children. In addition, PAR as a legitimate methodology, the literature identified the following disenfranchised groups: persons with chronic illnesses such as HIV/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and depression (n = 26), psychiatric diagnoses (eg clinical depression, schizophrenia) (n = 15), survivors of abuse (n = 6), alcohol misuse (n = 2), illicit drug use (n = 4), prescription drugs use (n = 4), prison populations (n = 2) and people with organic brain disorders (n = 5).

Results/Conclusions:

While we have used action research approaches to research with people to explore disruptive events and develop ways they can transition through the event to create a sense of continuity in their lives, the literature has established that PAR is now a well-established methodological means for engaging with disempowered and/or marginalized populations into their own health management.