Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T23:04:39.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigations of discrepancies between laboratory studies of the flow of ice: density, sample shape and size, and grain-size

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

T. H. Jacka*
Affiliation:
Antarctic CRC, Box 252C, Hobart 7001, Australia and Australian Antarctic Division
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Laboratory results are presented concerning ice creep at minimum creep rate (at ~1% strain) for fine-grained, initially isotropic, polycrystalline samples. The effect on the creep rate of ice density, sample shape (aspect ratio) and size, grain-size and ratio of grain-size to sample size is examined. Provided sample density is above ~0.83 Mg m−3 (i.e. the close-off density), there is no effect of density on ice-creep rate. Results provide no evidence of a creep rate dependence on test sample length for cylindrical samples. Sample diameter, however, does affect creep rate. Over the range of sample diameters studied (16.2 to 90 mm) creep rate decreases monotonically by a factor of ~4. This effect is independent of sample aspect ratio. Experiments examining size effects in simple shear indicate no dependence of minimum flow rate on shape or size in this stress configuration. Two grain-sizes were represented within the samples tested for the effect of sample size. As expected from earlier work, no grain-size effect on minimum creep rate is evident. In addition, there was no evidence of an effect on creep rate of the ratio of grain-size to sample size.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1994
Figure 0

Table 1. Results of tests concerning the effect of density on minimum ice strain rate

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Plot of minimum octahedral shear strain rate (measured in compression) as a function of ice-sample density, compared With the results obtained by Haefeli and von Sury (1975) (dotted line) and Mellor and Smith (1966) (dashed line). Data from laboratory sample tests arc shown as dots; data from ice-core sample tests are shown as triangles.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Plot of total axial strain at minimum strain rate as a function of initial sample density.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Plot of per cent volume decrease at minimum strain rate as a function of initial sample density.

Figure 4

Table 2. Minimum strain-rate results for cylindrical samples of various shapes and sizes in uniaxial compression

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Minimum octahedral shear strain rate plotted as a function of sample length for all data points. Two crystal sizes are indicated while numbers beside points are (a) sample diameter in mm, and (b) sample aspect ratio. Also shown in (b) are contours (dashed lines) of aspect ratio.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Minimum octahedral shear strain rate as a function of sample diameter. Two crystal sizes are indicated and the numbers beside each point are sample diameter to crystal diameter ratio, d\D.

Figure 7

Table 3. Minimum strain-rate results for rectangular prism samples of various shapes and sizes in simple shear

Figure 8

Table 4. Summary of published data normalised lo a common temperature and stress

Figure 9

Fig. 6. Minimum octahedral shear strain rates from past published studies, plotted as a junction of sample diameter for results normalised to a, TN = 0.25MPa, θN = −5.0°C and b, TN = 0.25MPa, θN = −10.0°C. The curves are parallel to the curve of Figure 5.