Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T23:44:21.801Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental characterization of dielectric properties of carbon nanotube networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Mahmoud A. EL Sabbagh*
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA. Phone: +1 479-287-9074.
*
Corresponding author: M.A. EL Sabbagh Email: msabbagh@ieee.org
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores the characterization of dielectric and conductive properties of carbon nanotube (CNT) networks. This is carried out by building planar transmission lines where conventional metallic traces are replaced by CNT networks. The proposed transmission lines with CNT networks are presented. Experimental realization and repeated two-port microwave measurements of proposed transmission lines enable the accurate extractions of their fundamental parameters showing percolation effects due to presence of CNT networks. The frequency-dependent phase velocity characteristics show a dramatic reduction compared to the speed of light in vacuum. The large magnitude of extracted complex permittivity for CNT networks also exhibits its percolation performance. The effects of CNTs' bulk density on measured and calculated parameters are explained. The results presented in this paper demonstrate the feasibility and the potential of building transmission lines and radio-frequency (RF) circuits elements using CNT networks.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2011
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Equivalent circuit model per unit length of a transmission line.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Configuration of the proposed transmission line structure: (a) top substrate, (b) bottom substrate, and (c) top view of bottom substrate showing CNTs inserted in the groove between SMA connectors at input and output. Dimensions are not to scale. Figure 3 gives picture of actual fabricated transmission lines.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Configuration of the actual manufactured transmission line structure. The units of the background ruler are in inch.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Phase-contrast image of the as-provided sample of CNTs used in this study. The figure shows the bundled networks of CNTs.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Multi-wall (a) CNTs as well as graphite layer stacking (b) are identified in this high-resolution electron microscopy image.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Configuration of the experimental setup used to test the constructed transmission line. Dimensions are not to scale.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Magnitude of reflection coefficient in dB versus frequency in MHz for transmission lines with length l = 2, 3, 4, and 5 cm.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Magnitude of transmission coefficient in dB versus frequency in MHz for transmission lines with length l = 2, 3, 4, and 5 cm.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Attenuation constant in Np/m versus frequency in MHz for transmission lines with length l = 2, 3, 4, and 5 cm.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Propagation constant in rad/m versus frequency in MHz for transmission lines with length l = 2, 3, 4, and 5 cm.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Inductance per unit length in mH/m versus frequency in MHz as extracted for the manufactured transmission lines with length l = 2, 3, 4, and 5 cm.

Figure 11

Fig. 12. Capacitance per unit length in nF/m versus frequency in MHz as extracted for the manufactured transmission lines with length l = 2, 3, 4, and 5 cm.

Figure 12

Fig. 13. Resistance per unit length in kΩ/m versus frequency in MHz as extracted for the manufactured transmission lines with length l = 2, 3, 4, and 5 cm.

Figure 13

Fig. 14. Normalized phase velocity versus frequency in MHz as extracted for the manufactured transmission lines with length l = 2, 3, 4, and 5 cm.

Figure 14

Fig. 15. Real part of the relative dielectric constant of CNT networks versus frequency in MHz as extracted from the manufactured transmission lines with length l = 2, 3, 4, and 5 cm. Y-axis is in log scale.

Figure 15

Fig. 16. Imaginary part of the relative dielectric constant of CNT networks versus frequency in MHz as extracted from the manufactured transmission lines with length l = 2, 3, 4, and 5 cm. Y-axis is in log scale.

Figure 16

Fig. 17. Loss tangent of CNT networks versus frequency in MHz as extracted from the manufactured transmission lines with length l = 2, 3, 4, and 5 cm.

Figure 17

Fig. 18. Locus in the complex plane of the relative complex permittivities divided by the bulk density. The averaged data correspond to those extracted from the manufactured transmission lines with length l = 2, 3, 4, and 5 cm.

Figure 18

Fig. 19. Magnitude of reflection coefficient versus frequency in MHz for the 3 cm transmission line at different bulk densities.

Figure 19

Fig. 20. Magnitude of transmission coefficient versus frequency in MHz for the 3 cm transmission line at different bulk densities.

Figure 20

Fig. 21. Variation of the real part of relative dielectric versus density of CNTs at two different frequencies 50 and 100 MHz.

Figure 21

Fig. 22. Variation of the imaginary part of relative dielectric versus density of CNTs at two different frequencies 50 and 100 MHz.

Figure 22

Fig. 23. Standard deviation of the mean resistance per unit length versus frequency in MHz. These data are extracted for the 3 cm transmission line.

Figure 23

Fig. 24. Standard deviation of the mean phase velocity normalized with respect to the speed of light in vacuum versus frequency. These data are extracted for the 3 cm transmission line.