Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T06:54:02.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Parasite dynamics in an invaded ecosystem: helminth communities of native wood mice are impacted by the invasive bank vole

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2017

KAREN C. LOXTON*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
COLIN LAWTON
Affiliation:
Ryan Institute, School of Natural Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
PETER STAFFORD
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
CELIA V. HOLLAND
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
*
*Corresponding author: Department of Zoology, School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. E-mail: loxtonk@tcd.ie

Summary

It is becoming increasingly evident that biological invasions result in altered disease dynamics in invaded ecosystems, with knock-on effects for native host communities. We investigated disease dynamics in an invaded ecosystem, using the helminth communities of the native wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus) in the presence and absence of the invasive bank vole (Myodes glareolus) in Ireland. Native wood mice were collected over 2 years from four sites to assess the impact of the presence of the bank vole on wood mouse helminth community dynamics both at the component and infracommunity level. We found evidence for dilution (Syphacia stroma), spill-back (Aonchotheca murissylvatici) and spill-over (Taenia martis) in native wood mice due to the presence of the bank vole. Site of capture was the most important factor affecting helminth community structure of wood mice, along with year of capture and host-age and the interactions between them.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 
Figure 0

Table 1. Approximate ranges of morphometric measures used to assign wood mice to three age classes

Figure 1

Table 2. Number of wood mice sampled by site, year, sex and age class

Figure 2

Table 3. Helminth species recovered from wood mice by taxon, location within the host, life cycle, host species and native or introduced status

Figure 3

Table 4. Helminth component community measures in wood mice by year and site

Figure 4

Fig. 1. Frequency distribution of helminth species richness in wood mice in 2011 (A) and 2012 (B). Host number is indicated above the bars.

Figure 5

Fig. 2. Mean species richness (±s.e.m.) of helminths in wood mice. Species richness by site (A), site and age class (B) and year (C).

Figure 6

Fig. 3. Mean Brillouin's Index of Diversity (±s.e.m.) of helminths in wood mice. Mean Brillouin's Index by year (A) and age class and sex (B).

Figure 7

Fig. 4. Mean prevalence (% ±CI) and mean abundance (±s.e.m.) of Syphacia stroma in wood mice. Prevalence by site (A). Abundance by site (B), year (C) and age class (D).

Figure 8

Fig. 5. Mean prevalence (%±CI) and mean abundance (±s.e.m.) of Aonchotheca murissylvatici in wood mice. Prevalence by site (A), site and year (B) and age class (C). Abundance by site (D), age class (E) and sex (F).

Figure 9

Fig. 6. Mean prevalence (%±CI) and mean abundance (±s.e.m.) for Trichuris muris in wood mice. Prevalence by site and year (A) and age class (B). Abundance by site and year (C) and age class (D).

Figure 10

Fig. 7. Mean abundance (±s.e.m.) for Heligmosomoides polygyrus in wood mice for the uninvaded site Knocksink. Abundance by age class (A) and year (B).

Figure 11

Fig. 8. Mean prevalence (%±CI) and mean abundance (±s.e.m.) of Hymenolepis hibernia in wood mice. Prevalence by site (A), year (B) and sex (C). Abundance by site and age class (D), site and year (E) and sex and year (F).

Figure 12

Fig. 9. Mean prevalence (%±CI) and mean abundance (±s.e.m.) of Skrjabinotaenia lobata in wood mice. Prevalence by site (A), year (B) and age class and sex (C). Abundance by site (D), year (E) and age class and sex (F).

Figure 13

Fig. 10. Mean prevalence (%±CI) and mean abundance (±s.e.m.) of Brachylaemus recurvum in wood mice. Prevalence by site and year (A) and age class (B). Abundance by site and year (C), age class (D) and year (E).

Figure 14

Fig. 11. Mean prevalence (%±CI) and mean abundance (±s.e.m.) of Corrigia vitta in wood mice. Prevalence by site (A) and year (B). Abundance by site and age class (C), site and year (D), age class and year (E) and year and sex (F).

Figure 15

Table 5. Relative population size of wood mice (per trapping period) in all study sites by year

Figure 16

Table 6. Climatic data for uninvaded sites and invaded sites in 2011 and 2011

Supplementary material: File

Loxton supplementary material

Tables 1-2

Download Loxton supplementary material(File)
File 29.9 KB