Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T13:13:15.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is parasitic infection a buffer against metal pollution?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2025

N.V. Leiva*
Affiliation:
Programa Doctorado en Ciencias Aplicadas Mención Sistemas Acuáticos, Universidad de Antofagasta, Antofagasta, Chile Instituto de Ciencias Naturales ‘Alexander von Humboldt’, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y Recursos Biológicos, Universidad de Antofagasta, Antofagasta, Chile
D. Montenegro
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación de Estudios Avanzados del Maule (CIEAM), Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca, Chile
C. Castro
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciencias Naturales ‘Alexander von Humboldt’, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y Recursos Biológicos, Universidad de Antofagasta, Antofagasta, Chile
M. Silva
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciencias Naturales ‘Alexander von Humboldt’, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y Recursos Biológicos, Universidad de Antofagasta, Antofagasta, Chile
R. Vidal
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Genomics, Molecular Ecology and Evolutionary Studies, Department of Biology, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile
M.T. González*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciencias Naturales ‘Alexander von Humboldt’, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y Recursos Biológicos, Universidad de Antofagasta, Antofagasta, Chile
*
Corresponding authors: M.T. González and N.V. Leiva; Emails: teresa.gonzalez@uantof.cl; natalia.leiva@uantof.cl
Corresponding authors: M.T. González and N.V. Leiva; Emails: teresa.gonzalez@uantof.cl; natalia.leiva@uantof.cl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Metal pollution is a major global issue in aquatic environments, affecting environmental quality and potentially altering host–parasite dynamics. This study evaluates the buffering role of a larval trematode Himasthla sp. under experimental conditions to test the effect of copper (Cu) exposure on the survival of the marine snail Echinolittorina peruviana. Snails were collected from intertidal rocky pools over a two-month period from Coloso (23°45’S, 70°28’W), northern Chile, and identified as parasitized or unparasitized. Both groups were then exposed to Cu concentrations (3 and 6 mg/L). Kaplan–Meier curves were used to determine the percentage of survival over time and the respective confidence intervals (CI). A nested ANOVA was conducted to assess whether rediae abundance per snail varied by experiment time, snail status, and Cu concentration. Snail survival was affected by both Cu-concentrations, but the effect was greater at 6 mg/L. At 3 mg/L, 57% (CI: 49.9–66.6%) of unparasitized snails were alive at 192 h, while 56% (CI: 46.6–67.4%) of parasitized snails survived at 216 h. At 6 mg/L, 42% (CI:35-51%) of unparasitized snails survived at 192 h, while 48% of parasitized snails survived at 216 h (CI:39-59%). Regardless of Cu concentration, after 240 h, all unparasitized snails had died, while 15% of parasitized snails remained alive. Dead snails harboured 125±53 rediae, while survivors had 194±73 rediae, with no significant differences between treatments. Our results show that parasitized snails survived longer than unparasitized snails, suggesting a trade-off between parasitism and host survival in polluted environments.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Mean values ± standard deviation (±S.E.) of the seawater (SW) utilized to characterize the physic-chemical parameters

Figure 1

Table 2. Results of Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) for the effect of different Cu-concentrations (3 and 6 mg/L) and control group, and host condition (parasitized and unparasitized) on survival of Echinolittorina peruviana. Statistically significant relationships (p < 0.05) are indicated in bold.

Figure 2

Figure 1. Survival (%) of parasitized (P, red lines) and unparasitized snails (UP, blue lines) Echinolittorina peruviana exposed to 3 mg/L (thick dashed line) and 6 mg/L (dashed line) of copper, as well as the control group (solid line), over 240 hours (=10 days).

Figure 3

Table 3. Dunn test of the effects of copper concentrations (3 and 6 mg/L, and control unparasitized (UP) and parasitized (P)) on snail survival

Figure 4

Figure 2. Mean abundance ± standard error of rediae per parasitized snail exposed to the copper treatments 3 mg/L (solid line) and 6 mg/L (dashed line) during the 240 hours of exposure (=10 days).

Figure 5

Table 4. Results of nested ANOVA for the effect of Cu, host status (dead or alive), and exposure time (hours) on abundance of rediae per parasitized snail. Statistically significant relationships (p ≤ 0.05) are indicated in bold.

Supplementary material: File

Leiva et al. supplementary material

Leiva et al. supplementary material
Download Leiva et al. supplementary material(File)
File 20.6 KB