Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-cbk24 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T05:27:43.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fluid ratcheting by oscillating channel walls with sawteeth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2014

Jie Yu*
Affiliation:
Civil Engineering Program, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USASchool of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: Jie.Yu.1@stonybrook.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A laboratory experiment shows that fluid can be pumped from one end to another in a narrow channel whose sawtooth walls vibrate transversely opposite to each other. The phenomenon is referred to as ratcheting fluid. Inspired by this, we put forward here a theory describing the rectified steady flow, and the net directional pumping. In a conformally transformed plane, the induced steady streaming in the Stokes boundary layer of the oscillatory flow is analysed, elucidating the driving mechanism that is due to the nonlinearity and viscosity. The solution of the stream function is given, showing the complex spatial structure of the induced steady flow and its spatial average that is related to the directional pumping. Whereas the wall sawtooth shape is the primary source of asymmetry, the difference in entrance and exit flow conditions due to the geometries at channel ends is found to be a secondary source to break the left–right symmetry of the system. This latter can affect the net directional transport of fluid, in particular in short channels with a small number of sawteeth. Various influences on the net pumping rate are analysed.

Information

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2014 Cambridge University Press 
Figure 0

Figure 1.A two-dimensional model of the channel with oscillating walls, showing the geometry and relevant scales.

Figure 1

Figure 2.Sawtooth profiles at $y_{s}=kh_{0}\left[1+{\it\epsilon}_{b}f(x)\right]$: ——, conventional sawtooth $f(x)=f_{1}(x)$ given by (2.18) with $q=0.2{\rm\pi}$, ${\it\epsilon}_{b}=1.0$, $kh_{0}=0.3142$ (${\it\lambda}_{s}=10h_{0}$); ⋯⋯, smooth profile $f(x)=\widetilde{f}_{1}(x)$ given by the first five terms of (2.19), for which $b_{j}$ and $c_{j}$ are computed; –  –  –, $f(x)$ given by the map which consists of the first three terms of $b_{j}$ and $c_{j}$, ${\it\epsilon}_{b}=1.0$, $kh_{0}=0.3130$; — ⋅ —, $f(x)$ plotted in terms of ${\it\xi}$.

Figure 2

Figure 3.Contours of stream functions in the half plane $y>0$ for an asymmetrical sawtooth wall profile: (a) the leading order flow ${\it\psi}_{0}$ at $t={\rm\pi}/2$, ${\rm\Delta}{\it\psi}_{0}=0.5$, $-8.2228\leqslant {\it\psi}_{0}\leqslant 7.4852$; (b) ${\it\psi}_{0}$ at $t={\rm\pi}$ near the reversal of the flow, ${\rm\Delta}{\it\psi}_{0}=0.05$, $-0.5268\leqslant {\it\psi}_{0}\leqslant 0.1813$; (c) the induced steady streaming ${\it\alpha}{\it\psi}_{10}$, ${\it\alpha}{\rm\Delta}{\it\psi}_{10}=0.05$, $-0.1250\leqslant {\it\psi}_{10}\leqslant 1.0496$. Dashed lines indicate the negative contour values. Dimensionless parameters: oscillation amplitude ${\it\alpha}=0.2$ and frequency ${\it\sigma}=0.6538$, sawtooth wavelength ${\it\beta}=0.3130$ and height ${\it\epsilon}_{b}=1.0$.

Figure 3

Figure 4.Time averaged volume flow rate ${\it\alpha}Q$ varying with phase angle ${\it\theta}$ which indicates the left end position: (a) symmetrical sawtooth with $q=0.5{\rm\pi}$. (b) Asymmetrical sawtooth with $q=0.2{\rm\pi}$. Parameters: oscillation amplitude ${\it\alpha}=0.3$, sawtooth wavelength ${\it\beta}=0.3130$ and height ${\it\epsilon}_{b}=1.0$, and channel length $N{\rm\pi}$, $N=10$. Oscillation frequencies: ▵, ${\it\sigma}=0.6524$; ○, ${\it\sigma}=0.8008$; ▫, ${\it\sigma}=1.1325$; ●, ${\it\sigma}=1.6016$.

Figure 4

Figure 5.Contours of the stream function ${\it\alpha}{\it\psi}_{10}$ for a symmetrical sawtooth wall profile. The left end position: (a) ${\it\theta}=-1.0996$, $-0.5933\leqslant {\it\alpha}{\it\psi}_{10}\leqslant 0.1958$ and ${\it\alpha}Q=-0.2355$; (b) ${\it\theta}=-0.7854$ (i.e. $-{\rm\pi}/4$),$-0.3773\leqslant {\it\alpha}{\it\psi}_{10}\leqslant 0.3773$ and ${\it\alpha}Q=0.0$; (c) ${\it\theta}=-0.4712$, $-0.1958\leqslant {\it\alpha}{\it\psi}_{10}\leqslant 0.5933$ and ${\it\alpha}Q=0.2355$. The contour increment ${\it\alpha}{\rm\Delta}{\it\psi}_{10}=0.05$. Parameters: oscillation amplitude ${\it\alpha}=0.3$ and frequency ${\it\sigma}=0.8008$, sawtooth wavelength ${\it\beta}=0.3130$ and height ${\it\epsilon}_{b}=1.0$, and $N=5$ for the channel length.

Figure 5

Figure 6.Effects of oscillation on the net pumping rate ${\it\alpha}Q$ (for half channel width) for an asymmetry sawtooth with $q=0.2{\rm\pi}$, wavelength ${\it\beta}=0.3130$ and height ${\it\epsilon}_{b}=1.0$:(a) ${\it\alpha}Q$ versus oscillation frequency ${\it\sigma}$ for amplitude ${\it\alpha}=0.3$; (b) ${\it\alpha}Q$ versus ${\it\alpha}$ for ${\it\sigma}=0.9247$. For channel lengths: ○, $N=15$; ▫, $N=10$; ▵, $N=5$.

Figure 6

Figure 7.Effects of sawtooth geometry on the net pumping rate ${\it\alpha}Q$ (for half channel width) for oscillation amplitude ${\it\alpha}=0.3$ and frequency ${\it\sigma}=0.8953$. (a) Plots of ${\it\alpha}Q$ versus $N$. Sawtooth height ${\it\epsilon}_{b}=1.0$, and wavelengths: ●, ${\it\beta}=0.2090$ (${\it\lambda}_{s}\simeq 15h_{0}$); ▵, ${\it\beta}=0.2506$ (${\it\lambda}_{s}\simeq 12.5h_{0}$); ○, ${\it\beta}=0.3130$ (${\it\lambda}_{s}\simeq 10h_{0}$); ▫, ${\it\beta}=0.4166$ (${\it\lambda}_{s}\simeq 7.5h_{0}$). (b) Plots of ${\it\alpha}Q$ versus ${\it\epsilon}_{b}$ for ${\it\beta}\simeq 0.31$: ○, $N=15$; ▫, $N=10$. The skewness parameter for the sawtooth $q=0.2{\rm\pi}$.