Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T06:19:25.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of defects on graphitization of SiC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2012

Göknur Cambaz Büke*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Cankaya University, Ankara, Turkey
Gleb Yushin
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332
Vadym Mochalin
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, A.J. Drexel Nanotechnology Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
Yury Gogotsi
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, A.J. Drexel Nanotechnology Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: goknurcambaz@gmail.com

Abstract

Epitaxial graphene and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) grown on SiC have shown big potential in electronics. The motivation to produce faster and smaller electronic devices using less power opened the way to a study of how to produce controlled epitaxial graphene and CNTs on SiC. Since defects are among the important tools to control the properties of materials, the effects of defects on the carbon formation on SiC have been analyzed. In this study, the effects of defects on the carbon formation on SiC have been analyzed. We produced carbon films on the surface of four different SiC materials (polycrystalline sintered SiC disks, single crystalline SiC wafers, SiC whiskers, and nanowhiskers) by chlorination and vacuum annealing with the goal to understand the effects of surface defects on the carbon structure and the SiC decomposition rate. We have shown that grain boundaries, dislocations, scratches, surface steps, and external surfaces may greatly enhance the reaction rate and affect the final structure of carbon derived from SiC.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012
Figure 0

FIG. 1. CDC layer on a sintered SiC polycrystalline ceramic sample produced by chlorination.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. SEM image of the optical quality polished (000$ \bar 1$) C face of SiC: (a) view from top and (b) from side after vacuum annealing at 1700 °C for 4 h.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. SEM images of SiC (0001) after vacuum annealing for 4 h at (a) 1400 °C, (b) 1500 °C, (c) 1800 °C, and (d) 1900 °C.

Figure 3

FIG. 4. (a) Schematic illustration; (b, c) SEM images of CNT formation on (b) C face and (c) Si face without pretreatment (b and c are adopted from Ref. 6).

Figure 4

FIG. 5. SEM images of (a) Si and (b) C surface of the 6H single crystalline wafer after chlorination at 1000 °C for 7 h. (c) Raman spectra taken from different regions [as numbered in panels (a) and (b)] of the sample surfaces. (1) From Si face without carbon formation, (2) from Si face inside the hexagonal etch pit, showing carbon formation, and (3, 4) from C face.

Figure 5

FIG. 6. SEM images of beta-SiC whiskers: (a) as-received and (b–d) after chlorination and removal of the coating by oxidation in air.

Figure 6

FIG. 7. TEM images of (a) transverse and (b) longitudinal surfaces of the SiC; (c) side surface crystal model of cubic SiC whisker (T denotes twins) (modified from Ref. 23).

Figure 7

FIG. 8. (a) SEM image and Raman spectrum of as-received SiC nanowhiskers; (b) TEM image and Raman spectrum of nanowhiskers annealed in vacuum at 1700 °C for 30 min.24

Figure 8

FIG. 9. Schematic showing initial stages of carbon formation on polycrystalline ceramics and single crystal SiC.